College Admissions Are Pretty Simple

This is attractive to many students, who desire to be making high salaries. With the high salary comes hard work, and the hard work put in is worth more. Engineers, for example, require labs and experiments that cost large amounts of money. Doctors have to study in hospitals and take hand on classes that also consumes university budgets. On the other hand, English majors are focused more on their books, which are individually expensive, but don’t cost universities much money. Universities should be obliged to allocate funds into the degrees that benefit them the most. They should not have to put as much money into a degree that does not make them money, as colleges are a business.

If HBCUs are to survive, they must increase financial contributions from alumni. This is particularly true at private institutions, where there is little or no revenue from states, upon which public institutions rely heavily. Alumni giving at public HBCUs is also becoming increasingly important because state funding is decreasing and the overall funding received from states is not on par with their majority institution counterparts (Gasman, 2010). HBCUs must enhance their alumni fundraising results in order to generate revenue to sustain them. Understanding the motivators to alumni giving at HBCUs can be critical to helping them improve alumni giving rates, and thus, the amount provided by them. There have been many research studies to determine the factors that affect alumni giving. One study found that there is a positive correlation between alumni perceptions of their undergraduate experience and their chances of financially supporting and participating with their institution (Gaier, 2005). Institutions should understand the key factors that contribute to those alumni perceptions so that they can make operational decisions designed to improve student

• Why not add alumni children to the list of favorable treatment in admission process?

According to Mullen research shows that a candidate has a 30% chance of admission, an applicant with the exact same academic record and extracurricular activities, but also a parent who attended the school as an undergraduate would have 75% chance. This shows that due to legacy admission, there’s less academic competition. Moreover, many colleges claim that legacy status is just use as a “tie breaker” in a very close admission call. However, according to the book affirmative action for the rich informs that the weight of legacy preference is noteworthy, adding 160 points to candidate’s record. Samuel G.

According to Mullen research shows that a candidate has a 30% chance of admission, an applicant with the exact same academic record and extracurricular activities, but also a parent who attended the school as an undergraduate would have 75% chance. This shows that due to legacy admission, there’s less academic competition. Moreover, many colleges claim that legacy status is just use as a “tie breaker” in a very close admission call. However, according to the book affirmative action for the rich informs that the weight of legacy preference is noteworthy, adding 160 points to candidate’s record. Samuel G. Freedman states that there are varieties of unearned advantages, legacy admissions being

“If we cut down on the number of legacy admissions, what would happen to the college budget? We might not even be able to keep things running!” Slippery Slope

The author felt very strongly about the need to get rid of exclusive preference for legacies or other special qualities in students that did not relate to academic achievement. Golden felt strongly about this matter when was writing for The Wall Street Journal. He had done a lot of research and discovered how dishonest Ivy League schools were being in their acceptance process. He interviewed many people, and sympathized with the intelligent students who did not get into their college of choice because they weren’t financially or socially satisfactory for the school. Many of the rich he tried to contact refused an interview, which Golden proves as their embarrassment to how they were admitted. He has many suggestions to help improve how Ivy League schools can better their acceptance process.

1. “If we cut down on the number of legacy admissions, what would happen to the college budget? We might not even be able to keep things running!”

Harvard accepts mediocre applicants if they are legacies in hope to get generous donations from their families. These donations help bring the school up and make it a better place. Many of the stories described talked about past Alumni donating to help persuade their child's acceptance.

Applying for college was very challenging. There were several steps I had to take before I could officially start. The first step I took before applying was taking the ACT test. Standardized test has always been difficult for me, so taking the test was something I really had to work on. It took a lot of studying and dedication. The second step I had to take was to attend registration, which at my college is called SOAR. It was overnight and we had two full days of information and it was very overwhelming at times. It was exhausting and the two days we were there felt like a week. Another step I did when applying for college was finding scholarships. I was homeschooled throughout high school so finding a good scholarship was almost impossible

This allows the Ivy League universities to afford the resources needed for their academic programs and research endeavors. The Ivy League schools are highly selective, with low acceptance

Legacy applicants tend to be from upper class America and most of the time, white. The answer to why schools continue giving preferential treatment to legacies is unfair but clear and understandable. Despite what colleges may say about close alumni relationships being the reason for legacy admissions, the real reason is money. An alum who has a good experience and a child attending the school is more likely to donate. If the alum comes from a wealthy family, they are even more likely to donate, increasing their child’s chance of being admitted into the school. For example, Stanford alums tend to become more economically successful than the general population. Stanford alums have an average mid-career salary of $114,000 versus the $51,017 national median household income. Colleges keep this in mind during their admissions process, which is why underqualified students are attending elite schools they aren’t academically fit for. This ends up impacting more than just the thousands of deserving applicants who are turned away to make space for legacy students. By doing this, college students begin becoming impacted as well. With the admission of under qualified legacies, colleges are forced to “water down” or simplify material to avoid having a majority of their students failing

Within institutes of higher education legacy status is valued mainly for economic and community-building reasons. Colleges have the belief that by admitting children of alumni, those alumni are more likely to stay involved with the school and donate money. Elite colleges often defend legacy admissions as necessary system for fund-raising. It is also believed within university admissions that legacies will become very active alumni due to their family connection with the school. In essence, colleges admit legacies as a way to not only keep their alumni involved, but to also ensure a new

Universities can best be viewed as corporations. Corporations are simply businesses. The only reason for a business to exist is to make a profit. In order to make a profit, universities sell a variety of degrees to students. Students desire a degree because they “want the credentials that will help them get ahead” (Edmundson). In some cases, students “want that certificate that will give them access to Wall Street, or entrance into law or medical or business school” (Edmundson). The students’ desire for power, money, and success drive them to attend college. The students have an abundance of universities to choose from. In order for the universities to earn money, they must use techniques to attract students. This can be accomplished in a few ways. Advertising is one approach that allows the universities to manipulate students into believing their school is the best. Eastern Michigan University has achieved these manipulation techniques in their ad.

Education is a universal right. Most students find their true passion for learning in college. Taking courses that interest them and avoiding courses that don 't interest them, college students find themselves in a world that is coming to an end but, it also leads to a new beginning. This is why it 's very important for most students to get an education from the nation 's so-called "prestigious" institutions. In a article written for Time Magazine, Frank Bruni writes "determined to get into one of the dozen or so most selective institutions of higher learning in America? I 'm sorry to break the news, but your odds have never been worse"[source]. In his remark, Mr. Bruni is shedding some light on a evasive problem that many students face as well as their parents. In a society that values personal achievement as much as we do, graduating from a top institution is a stepping stone to higher achievements and a better life. But, very few are fortunate to walk in this path. Between applying to colleges and getting an acceptance or a rejection, it can be a daunting process. That is because colleges and universities place a very big emphasis on grades such as the GPA, the AP scores, the SAT scores, and other things such as recommendations and extra curriculum activities. However, this emphasis tends to favor students who come from affluent families or those who have had advantages from the very start. In order to level the playing field, universities and colleges should accept