Public employees get paid every day for working hard to earn money. College athletes are not public employees who do not deserve payment. College athletes did not fill out an application to work for a company. College athletes worked hard throughout high school and received enough attention to have a college coach offer them free tuition to play for his college. Many people and critics fight for compensation for college athletes because they believe that they do not have time to earn money for basic needs. College athletes do not deserve payment because they have been given all they need to get through college. Big schools such as University of Michigan, University of Alabama, Virginia Tech, etc. have tons of money, mainly coming from their …show more content…
Why are these people complaining? They have been given something that most of the country’s population cannot afford. “At a time when student debt is a major national issue, most college athletes don't have to worry about it. They go to college for free, and when they graduate, most graduate debt free. They also receive cost of attendance benefits, meaning their day to day needs, such as food, housing, clothing, gas and travel back home, are covered” (Scott, Larry). College athletes do not have to worry about student debt or anything that the average college student would have to worry about. Some may say that college athletes should be paid for reasons outside of college, such as savings or going out for dinner every once in awhile; however, why is it the colleges’ problem to make sure their students’ off time is great? That is totally up to the student. Colleges do not have to give their students everything they want. College athletes should not be paid as employees because they have been given all of their daily needs and free education. These students can complain all they want, but they are not employees and do not deserve payment. Paying athletes will hurt our colleges and universities, paying athletes will hurt our
The key in my statement is that they should not be paid, but that doesn’t mean they should not be compensated. According to Dictionary.com being paid is earning money for doing a job, being compensated is earning money for doing something for someone, but is not considered a job. Now those may sound similar but think about what a job is. Professional sports players should be paid because playing at the professional level is their job career. College athletes should not be paid because they’re talents are being showcased to represent their school.
College athletes were being paid in the 1920’s to play for the NCAA but since then they were classified as “students” so the school or the NCAA did not have to pay them. They spend 43.3 hours on the field which is 3.3 more hours than the typical American work week which should technically classify them as employees instead of “students.” Coaches are being paid from $1 million to $7.5 million a year but the football athletes are getting paid nothing due to the NCAA rule of not receiving any of the money. While college football athletes do not currently get paid, they should be paid for their talents because the NCAA is making money off of them and the student athletes would be more likely to stay in school due to the money they would earn to pay off debts.
Whether college athletes should or should not get paid has been a controversial topic throughout the Collegiate Athletic Association for many years now. According to the article “My Priceless Opportunity” by Bill Walton , he believes that NCAA student athletes should not get paid because “the players entering the game know the rules going in and that they have been given a chance to make something of their lives in exchange for the privilege of being a student athlete”. Others like Michael Wilbon, author of “As Colleges’ Greed Grows, So Does the Hypocrisy”, thinks student athletes should get paid due to their hard work and labor. While I respect and admire the diligent task of being both a student and an athlete, I strongly agree with Bill Walton and the many others who support college athletes not being paid.
Paying college athletes make millions,if not 100’s of thousands for their college over four years.I believe college athletes do not get as much compensation as they should because they make a lot of money for their colleges but don't get paid and because scholarship money doesnt cover everything due to practices and school work they don't have much time at
One of the biggest controversies going on in America, especially within sports, is whether college athletes should or should not be paid. As it stands now, college athletes are not being paid with actual money. Instead, they are rewarded with athletic scholarships. NCAA and colleges believe that their athletes should not be paid due to their amateur status. However, college athletes should be paid because they don’t have time to get jobs, they may lose their scholarship, and they make a lot of money for their school.
Collegiate sports have turned into a billion dollar industry and are probably just as popular, if not more popular than professional sports. College athletes put their bodies on the line to play a sport they love, many with hopes and dreams to one day make it to the professional leagues. Athletic facilities are the major money makers for all universities. Colleges bring in billions of dollars in revenue annually, yet athletes do not get paid. Some fans believe athletes should not get paid due to their sports level being “amateurish.”; however, this is far from the truth. There is much more to being a college athlete than just practicing and playing games. These student-athletes must practice, weight lift, go to meetings, travel, go to tutoring and study groups, all the while maintaining sufficient grades. This is very tedious work and is very time consuming. College athletes have a high standard to live up to (Frederick Web; Huma Web; Patterson Web ).
There have been many debates about whether or not college athletes should or should not be compensated by their schools for their services. The way it should be is that they should not be compensated for their works for various reasons concerning the schools they play for. Coming from a college athlete, compensation for us will only bring trouble for the schools we play for. From many other athletes’ points of view, they want payment for their own benefits or needs, but they don't see how it will affect the schools they attend. Colleges should not be entitled to providing compensation for their student athletes because it will hurt the colleges financially.
For years now there have been the argument if college athletes should be paid to play or not. It is an ongoing debate between many people including the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA), athletes, coach, and other various people. The has debate has gone far enough that a lawsuit has started over it. There are many arguments for college athletes being paid such as; the athletes do not have time to work, their images are being used without any type of pay, and how the NCAA and coaches make millions of dollars off of the players while the players do not make anything. On the flip side of this, arguments that the athletes should not be paid include; they get paid in other varies ways, the average college athletic department loses enough money already without paying the athletes, and the fact that not all college athletes are in school to become professional athletes anyhow so making money from their athletic abilities should not be an issue for them at all.
But why should a student athlete be paid in the first place? Their just athletes right? They go to school just like everyone else? What makes them so special? What makes a college athlete different than the average student is the amount of revenue that they help bring to their selected colleges. This type of revenue is made up from ticket sales, merchandise, media rights and contributions. “USA today” reported that the University of Texas generated $167.7 million dollars from their athletic programs, and that’s just one school. With this in mind, imagine just how much money other colleges are making from their athletics. Sure one can make the argument that they should not be paid because they are not professionals, but one can’t ignore the fact that they are bringing in millions of dollars and seeing none of it.
Top collegiate athletes should be able to get paid. Schools are making millions in ticket sales, selling jerseys and other venues that help out of school. However, college athletes make all the money for the college. College athletes should deserve to to get paid. “The college sports industry generates $11 Billion in annual revenues.”(Text 1, line 1) the college sports industry generates so much money, that they need to share the money and that it's selfish. Scholarship athletes should be getting paid.
First of all, college athletes work countlessly to help their team. According to www.listland.com, NCAA athletes spend an average of 43.3 hours on their sport, when the average american works only 34.4 hours per week. NCAA athletes work harder and longer than the average american but don’t have a salary. NCAA’s own tournament schedule require students to miss class for nationally televised games. If students were to miss class, it should be important if they were making money. Also, they are missing out on what they paid for, an education. How the NCAA can repay them is by actually paying the athletes. This why college athletes deserve to be paid, because they work hard for no apparent reason
No one expects somebody to work two fulltime jobs and not get paid for it. Nobody would think it would be fair to work so hard and not receive any form of compensation. This is exactly what is happening to student athletes. Student athletes are not only fulltime students, but also are fulltime athletes. There are two very decisive sides to this argument. On one side the NCAA claims that the student athletes are amateurs and cannot be paid. They also claim they are paid in other ways such as a full ride scholarship to a top level education. The other side of the argument states that the work load of a fulltime student and a fulltime athlete is almost unmanageable and the NCAA is making millions off of their work and sweat. This is an issue
I strongly believe that college athletes shouldn’t get paid because a scholarship to a college to play for their team and a free education is enough payment. Student-athletes with full-ride scholarships don’t have to worry about student loans or any other debts they would have to pay back for attending that college.
College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every
Another argument in the case for college athletes to be paid would be that the scholarships that are offered to athletes aren’t enough to cover the lost wages they would gain from working a job. Even though some athletes are offered full ride scholarships to great universities, they aren’t enough to pay their rent and other bills that they have. With athletes committing so much time for sports they do not have the time to get a job and pay for their bills and other things they need. This puts more strain on the athletes and can cause them to drop out of their respective sports and when that happens they ultimately lose their scholarships. College athletics are more demanding than a full-time job should pay their athletes for their services provided to the university they play for. The wages lost by athletes at universities are even greater than those working typical eight-hour days. Since athletes, football in particular, commit an immense amount of time to their sports they could be obtaining a wage far greater than the amount of the scholarship they obtained for attending and participating in sports at a university. Another point to be made would be that only a small portion of the people associated with college athletics receive full scholarships. This means that not only are athletes committing so much time and effort for sports, they must pay out of pocket for the portion that their respective