College Athletes Should Be Paid

Paying college athletes can allow for a smoother transition from college to adult life. Most college athletes do not go pro, so giving a student athlete money can help them pay for their future life, as during college they do not have time to have a part-time job, as they have practices every day. Playing sports in college is not always great as the athletes don’t get paid for their dedication and hard work. “A study in 2012 by the NCAA has shown that only 1.7% of college football players go pro, and only 1.2% male college basketball players play in the NBA.” (Estimated probability of competing in professional athletics) This means that over 95% of student athletes do not make the pros, and after the college years have to live a normal

I have decided to research whether a collegiate athlete should be compensated for perform for his or her respective college or university. It is a highly controversial topic within my field of study because of the different views athletic authorities, administrators, athletes, alumni and future graduates have on the subject. According to "Pay to Play: Should College Athletes be Paid?", collegiate student-athletes may spend more than 40 hours a week practicing, leaving little time to keep up with academic commitments (Birkenes 4-5). Majority of their time is spent on the field or hard wood, making

Be that as it may, once the season began up, he couldn't work that employment any longer. We were out and about constantly, even gone for two straight weeks at a certain point. The educators let us do our work from the street, yet the occupation wasn't going to pay you since you were playing ball on a street trip. The group gave us supper cash (about $7 per feast) so we could get chips and fixings with our sandwiches, yet whatever else was viewed as a NCAA infringement.

One of the most controversial subjects we as individuals hear about this day in age is whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Many people argue that these athletes do intact, deserve to be paid for their time and hard work. NCAA athletes create a name for themselves by playing and performing well on their college teams. The better these athletes perform, the more publicity the school revives. This then leads to higher ticket sales and stores around campus selling jerseys and other clothing items with athletes names and numbers on the back. NCAA schools have become comfortable with using athletes’ names to bring in a revenue for the school, and yet the athletes never see any of that money. On the other hand, many people believe that these athletes do not deserve, nor should they expect to receive payment in return. They believe that these scholarships and the education are payment in itself. Some even bring up the question on if it is affordable or even realistic to pay college athletes.

One of the most important reasons why college athletes should not be paid is that most schools just simply can not afford to pay their athletes. Maxwell Strachan from the Huffington post reported that spokeswomen Meghan Durham from the NCAA stated that only about twenty colleges make more money on athletic programs than they spend on athletic programs. This shows that most colleges are not making any money off of their athletic programs and even if a college makes a

NCAA College athletes deserved to receive payment for the life they live. The reason why is due to schedule,the lack of money athletes can make, profit the schools make, and profit the NCAA makes..Although, college athletics in all organizations is important NCAA is the most profitable.As a college athlete who is also dealing with a school schedule they need a little help. The fact that people assume the scholarship makes everything so easy is false. A lot of hard work went into getting those scholarships and that shouldn’t be taken away from them. NCAA College athletes deserve to be paid.

College Athletes Should Be Paid One of the biggest controversial topics in NCAA sports is whether student-athletes should be paid or not. Many people would say this is a bad idea, but more people think the rules should be changed. ESPN analysts have given many situations in which both sides, the players and the schools, can make it a win-win situation. One example would be to pay the athletes up front to play, other than original scholarships. Another is letting college athletes have their own endorsement deals if the school itself is not comfortable paying the players up front.

“ We do have hungry nights that we don't have enough money to get food in “ said Shabazz Napier. College Athletes around the country do not have enough money to feed themselves and the NCAA gives players a very little amont of money which limits there options. A College Athlete should never be in a situation where they are deciding wether they are going to pay for there next meal or put gas in there car. Most people did not know that College Athletes can not get a job due to certain guidelines. Scholarships often do not cover the full living expenses of an Athlete. Therefore it can be seen through one’s point of view that college athletes should be paid because they are unable to get a job due to NCAA regulations and shortage of time due

The System for college athletes isnt perfect, and needs to be worked on, a big problem we cannot seem to agree is how to compensate the student-athletes who drive the NCAA. I would like to start off with a question. Are college athletes being compensated enough for the effort they put forth today? Every Day they wake up early and represent their university whether they are putting in work in class or on the field. Each student-student athlete generates tons of money for their university and they don’t see a dime other than their scholarship that may or may not been renewed every year. Keep that question in mind while reading this essay, and form your own opinion.

Today's childhood kids try to join the positions of the best who ever played the game, and college is the first step in that American dream. At this level kids surrender a lot of time to put in hours every day trying to be the best of their ability. As of right now, a college athlete cannot be paid or promoted in a way that benefits the school or the athlete. A developing debate focuses on whether these athletes should be paid for their hard working dedication.

College athletes have issues with not receiving pay. Athletes that are soon going to become a big star are still working at basic jobs. For many years people have been talking about why don’t college athletes receive a good amount of pay. They should receive some type of money for being apart of a team and actually putting in all of this work to maintain a status.

College athletes should be paid. The athletes put in as much work as the people who do get paid. Why should they not be paid? There are many pros for why they should get paid, but there are also many cons on why they should not get paid. The athletes should get paid because of how hard they work in season and the off-season. Do not pay all of the athletes, but pay the ones who are at a D1 college. The athletes should get paid because they put in the same amount of time as the pros do, and the pros get paid.

Within the last week you've received multiple scholarship offers from several NCAA Division I schools to play basketball, namely the University of North Carolina. Your dream of playing college basketball for a major program finally came true. Full scholarships generally cover all of the fees for tuition, books, room and board; however, they do not cover any out-of-pocket expenses. In fact, there are many instances where college athletes are unable to afford food, close or anything else that normal young adults relish. As a result, countless numbers of college athletes receive money from boosters, alumni, and agents, or illegally sell signed memorabilia to survive. A key point differentiating typical college students from student athletes is students have the opportunity to work and earn income in addition to scholarships, grants or loans they receive while pursuing a college degree; athletes cannot. Also, college athletes must participate in

Kim Kardashian’s ex lover is not just famous for dating a “Kardashian”; he was more famous for the controversial issue with the NCAA due to proceeds given to him for his ability on the field. Reggie Bush made a lot of accomplishments while being a college athlete. Because of his skills, he was rewarded an amount of money. While Reggie Bush was playing at the University of Southern California, statistics show that the college generated roughly fifty-five million dollars. That’s a lot of money for one athlete to bring in. Every day we hear more and more stories about NCAA investigators and colleges being punished for “paying” players. However, college athletes bring in a lot of money. Therefore, they should get a percentage whether it is a small amount or a large amount. It will depend on the athletes’ ability. While some may argue that paying college athletes to play is wrong, college athletes have a marketable skill and should be paid for their skill.

Is an athletic scholarship really enough of a “payment” to reimburse athletes for the billions of dollars made by the NCAA every year? This issue of paying collegiate athletes, especially football and basketball players, has been around for many years. Athletes, students, bystanders, and NCAA analysts and authority figures have a strong opinion about paying college athletes. Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a debate topic that is more prevalent today than ever.