College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

College sports are a phenomenon that keeps viewers coming back for more. Stated in an article on Money Nation the NCAA makes an estimated $1 billion per year and this number is still growing. What really is insane is that all that money is made off of college athletes, who don’t get a penny from that total number. The debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid has been around for decades and probably will still be here for years to come. Paying college athletes would make the teams unfair, change how hard players will work to get better, affect the amateurism of college sports, and lastly influence the athlete's willingness to participate in college sports.

Joe Posnanski, a sports journalist and former columnist for Sports Illustrated, weighed in on the controversial issue of college athletes receiving money as a service of their play. “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” published 2011 from the Norton Sampler starts off by introducing one of his main arguments that “College athletics are not about the players” (Posnanski 585) but instead are about the alumni and the colleges themselves that people support. If player on a team left and made their own team would that colleges alumni now support their semi-pro team, no chance. College Supporters love the youthful feeling and the how close they feel too it. He shows how big time college athletes do get paid in tuition, room and board, food,

Paying college athletes would be good for students, they wouldn't have to be worrying about anything. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need. If you're willing to help student athletes in college help me make a difference in the world and make these college athletes have a nice time In college by not having to worry to be paying stuff on

College sports has become extremely popular over the past few years. With the March Madness tournament held in March and the new College Football Playoff held in January, the NCAA has achieved a great deal of attention and high television ratings. Although colleges make tons of money off of their athletes, college athletes receive plenty of compensation. Paying student athletes would cross the line between professionalism and amateurism and would violate the essence of being a student athlete.

Both sides of this argument have a strong case for why student athletes should, or should not be compensated. The problem might not be what it looks like at first. The main problem is the amount being spent on college athletes and the rising tuition costs for these universities. Duke University 's golf team spent an estimated $20,405 per player (Branstetter). The amount of money being spent on one player on their golf team is represented in the insane amount of tuition which is 60,000 dollars a year at Duke. This is a huge reason as to why colleges are so eager to get a cut of a 60 billion dollar industry. The issue of paying student athletes is not so one sided as athletes work very hard between school and sports, or that

In the spring of 2014, the Northwestern University football team did something that has never been done before in the history of college sports. Several scholarship players voted on whether the team should unionize. These same players believe that they should be compensated for their play on the athletic field. Countless collegiate sports fans also believe that college athletes from around the country should be compensated for playing sports; however, paying college athletes would cause multiple problems in college athletics. Most people do not understand how much student athletes are given to them free of charge just to attend a university, while the majority of other average students are stuck with the burden of paying for their education. College athletes should not be paid since schools do not have the money to pay student athletes, it would not be fair for athletes who do not play football or basketball, and they have athletic scholarships that allow them to receive a free education.

Imagine working a full time job with your family to take care of but you spend more time

There has been on ongoing discussion between college athletes and the NCAA on whether they should be compensated for the work they do for their selective school. Student athletes deserve to be paid to invest in their needs, and the schools have the money to do so. College Athletes have made the case that they are no longer student athletes, but are on the clock workers. The NCAA accumulates around 11 billion dollars in revenue a year, more money than the NFL, NBA, and MLB. Many writers such as Joe Nocera, a sports business columnist for the New York Times, talks about how “The NCAA and college sports establishment exploit the players who generate the billions that the grown-ups pocket.” College Athletics’ is the school’s number one money

The NCAA, National Collegiate Athletic Association, is a “non-profit” organization which regulates players from 1,281 institutions and earns $995 million annually (Garda). The 480,000 athletes hosted by the NCAA do not receive a penny of the NCAA’s revenue (Nocera). The real question is, who is the labor force behind the NCAA? The labor force is the athletes. Who does not receive a salary from the NCAA for their labor? The players do not receive a salary. There is no other labor force that does not receive pay, only benefits. College-level athletes are only allowed to accept scholarships, and in some cases players have been disqualified for receiving money in other ways than presented by the attended institution. Scholarships provide players

Collegiate athletes attend college to master their craft before going professional, and should not be paid. This also does not factor in other things such as injury and other issues that could arise. Colleges paying students to perform is not merited and would only cause more problems. Scholarships are important because they allow a student who could not usually attend college for free with the only requirement being that they play on the football team. That is why student athletes should not get paid, because they are already receiving a free education. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) of college football would be nothing without its players. The NCAA is broken up into three divisions, going from best known and talented universities in division one to the least known and talented universities in division three. Depending on the talent of the high school player he can pick from any of the three divisions. If that same player reaches the ultimate goal of a college football player, which is to be recruited to the Nation Football League (NFL) then that player is known as a Premium college player. Universities that would pay college football players would set a precedent that sports are more important than an education, which is why they should not get paid.

First, college is about earning an education not money. If the NCAA starts letting colleges pay there athletes it will defeat the purpose of them going to school. It will discourage kids from finish and getting a degree because they 'll already be making the money they want to make when there out of college. An estimated 18.2 million people enrolled in college in 2007. There are over 460,000 NCAA student athletes, that play in 23 different sports. More then 8

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes

College athletes should also get paid because they could get injured while playing the sport. It is highly unlikely if a college athlete gets seriously hurt to the point where they need surgery, the college would pay for it. These athletes endure various drills and push themselves to the max day in and day out which makes them vulnerable to injury. So it would only be fair that the college athlete sees some of the money they helped generate into the school. If a player does get hurt, it could end their career. If this players dream was to be a professional athlete, they can't even achieve that dream

There are positive and negative sides to paying college athletes, but when it comes down to a solution. I think college athletes should not be paid. They do deserve some benefits but paying them is too much. Anyways it would be unfair to other student athletes and non- student athletes. If they do get paid it is going to have a cause and effect domino. It would cut other academic programs, it would cut other sports for some of the smaller colleges. It makes a really big impact on not paying athletes because they are still amateur athletes that are playing for an institution versus playing professional where there are playing for money and not there for education, which these athletes playing for their school they are there for an education

College athletes struggle to find enough time to attend classes, complete their homework, and attend practices and workouts. They would stay in school longer. People are paying to watch these players play at a high level and they are not getting anything for their efforts. It is not easy to make it to the college level in any sport. College athletes are not amateurs and are very talented in the sports that they play. Student athletes are getting cheated out of an education and thousands of dollars. Even the student athletes feel like they are getting cheated. There are also no reasons for student athletes not to play as hard if they were paid. Colleges have gotten in trouble for paying athletes under the table. Paying college athletes would solve this problem. College athletes work all year round on their sports and train just as hard as the professionals. I believe student athletes should be