College Athletes Should Not Be Paid Essay

In trying to decide what research topic I wanted to use, I took many ideas into thought. I decided that the one idea that interests me most is whether student athletes should be paid or not. This is very intriguing to me since my master’s program is sports management. In order to do this research there must be many ways to use research as well as ideas from other people. This project is a very big topic in today’s discussion amongst sport fans, college administrators, and student athletes themselves. Media has recently put more pressure on this topic as well with the Northwestern decision to unionize as well as pointing out an athletic director gaining an $18,000 supplement for a wrestler at their school winning a national

I believe that college sports should be considered a profession. Athletes deserve to be paid for their work. College athletics are a critical part of America’s culture and economy. At the present time, student-athletes are considered amateurs. College is a stepping-stone to

Should College Athletes Get Paid? Would you like to work harder in college sports if you got paid? I know I would. I’m talking about this topic because I think it’s important that the college athletes get something for themselves. College athletes should get paid because some of them are tempted to gamble or accept illegal payments, they win games for their university in the premier sport, and they do the same stuff as professional athletes.

The question people are asking is, should college athletes get paid? This is a very popular question that a lot of people are asking. College athletes should be getting paid for playing athletics. The athletes that are playing college have worked hard to get where they're at. The athletes that are playing are still college students and don't have a lot money. The athletes are bringing tons of money to the school. Getting paid will help them take care of their money.

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Some people in the NCAA think that players should be payed money for playing a sport that they were offered by the college coach, and I’m here to tell you why I think it’s a bad idea and some sources from people who agree with me. I will also tell you the few good thing about this idea, but in my opinion there’s more bad than good coming out of this.

Throughout the existence of the NCAA and the realm of intercollegiate competition, one of the largest topics of debate has been the idea to compensate athletes based on athletic performance above any scholarships awarded. Mark Emmert, president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, has previously said “We can never move to a place where we are paying players to play sports for us” (Garcia, 2010, para.9). This statement by Emmert has again sparked several conversations concerning the specifics of what defines amateurism and the exploitation of our young student athletes. The awarding of a salary to athletes is both heavily supported and strongly opposed by players, spectators, coaches, and collegiate

What if someone wasn’t getting paid to do your job? What if someone were invited to a workplace to dedicate at least one year of pushing every physical limit thought possible. But what if someone did all that for free? Would they still do it? Opt out for a better situation? It seems that many Future NCAA athletes are asking this question to themselves more and more these days. And the question being begged her has a complex yet clear answer to it. If anyone who plays any sport at a college level chances are other than possibly a scholarship You’re not receiving much of anything else. So this sparks a huge debate. Why are NCAA athletes not getting paid? The NCAA makes slightly more than 1 BIllion dollars of revenue every year, and yet not one cent goes to college

Final Exam: Athletes should be paid When being a professional athlete it takes up majority of your time with many practices, games, watching film, traveling, etc. When becoming a professional athlete, it becomes your job and athletes are getting paid for their skills. But when a student becomes a student athlete at the collegiate level, they are not getting paid. College athletes spend more than half of their time on the field for their sports and many people believe that the student athlete should be paid for their skills. They think it is unfair to the student who is an athlete who is balancing out school and sports and have no time to get a job.

Should College Athletes Get Paid or Not? One of the biggest issues with college athletes is if they should get paid or not. College athletes do get scholarships to play for whatever sport they intend to play at the university of his or her choosing but they also need money for extracurricular activities such as going to the movies, hanging out with friends, food, etc. So my thesis is what are the advantages and disadvantages of college athletes getting paid.

Can you imagine being a firefighter saving lives, but a college athlete making more money than you? How would that make you feel? People all over the world are saving lives, yet athletes make more than them. Many people have researched this topic on weather college athletes should be paid to play or not. I strongly disagree to college athletes being paid to play.

Have you ever noticed how college athletes work their hearts out to play sports but do not get paid for what they do? In my opinion, that is just crazy. There is no way that I would do all of the hard work they put in and do not get any pay for return. They do get their college classes and materials paid for. That is a plus, but when they go out there and play sports for these schools, they are putting their bodies at risk because of all of the contact and rough housing they go through in each game that they play.

With the click of a pen teenagers commit their future four years into the hands of universities, in return they receive free education and the possibility of competing in their favorite sport. N.C.A.A. fulfills the dreams of many young adults giving them a chance to prosper and obtain something more in their life. These students get to travel and see places they have never dreamed of, and the only cost is to play the sport they love. Yet for some reason many people believe colleges are robbing the lucky, talented students. They assert that on top of a full ride scholarship athlete should also receive a paycheck. However, student-athletes should not receive wages as they already are granted privileged opportunities for playing a sport in college.

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

Waking up before the sunrise is a daily routine. Early morning film sessions, class, then practice, which dominates the day. There are few moments in between for food and socializing, but the life of a student athlete is anything but ordinary. Sleep, eat, practice and school are all an athlete knows, and with the pressures of campus life it becomes even more difficult. No time for much of anything, let alone getting a job. Like most students, these athletes need money, but do not have a spare moment to work. Without any source of income, athletes are put at a major disadvantage. Their full-time job is athletics, in addition to rigorous college-level courses. The possibility of becoming a professional athlete and making millions

The world of collegiate athletics was founded upon the ideals of commercialism and is filled with talented athletes that contain tremendous amounts of potential. Unfortunately, in order to bring in revenue that serves as crucial funding for their universities nationwide, the NCAA exploits the talent of these players and justifies this action by assuming the disguise of “amateurism” while also managing to adopt an indistinct version of professionalism. Instead, the NCAA spends portions of its revenue in order to renovate sports facilities and pay members of the coaching staff rather than providing compensation for the main sources of its revenue-- the players and the attention that their athletic talents bring to this organization. By