Essay College Athletes Should Not Get Paid for Play

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

58 percent of people believe that college athletes should get paid to play compared to the 42 percent who think they should not get paid to play (Debate.org). This clashing of whether or not college athletes should get paid to play has been a hot topic throughout the nation for quite some time. Many believe that paying players will not help the players, but will cause more negative energy than positive. Of course all college athletes believe they should be paid because they are looking to make some type of profit for bringing in so much money into the school. Not only are they bringing in money for the school they are also creating a good image for the school and getting the schools name out there. Maybe even interest other young athletes

In most sports, there is either college or professional. However, to get to professional, you usually need to play in college. But some kids don’t get the opportunity to play in college for one reason; They don’t get paid. College athletes should get paid because it is fair, they deserve it, and it helps their families. One reason for college athletes should get paid is it is fair for them.

There have been ongoing arguments over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others cite that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. However regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be paid to play.

A major argument by those who oppose paying college athletes is that they are amateurs who are students first and athletes second. However, that is not nearly the case. Many athletes in college are there to compete and attend school simply because they have to in order to play for that particular team. The NCAA purposely schedules games for times in which players are guaranteed to miss class, for

Paying collegiate athletes is a very controversial topic that has been talked about since the creation of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in 1910. People believe that the rules that are in place now for collegiate athletes should remain the same, which classifies college athletes as amateurs, banning them from earning any type of compensation for their athletic ability. Other people think that college athletes should be paid for many reasons, including their dedication, risk of injury, competitive unbalance, and because of the profits, the NCAA makes from athletic events. Student-athletes in college do not get the same opportunities to do certain things as people that are not in any athletic events. Most college students

College athletes receive many benefits while playing for the school of their choice. The endorsements for playing a division 1 college sport is obscene. The college athletes receive many compensations for playing a college sport including free tuition, textbooks, housing, and meal plans. Therefore college athletes should not be paid a salary for playing a sport.

Although researches think college players shouldn't be paid. Some of the college athletes think they should be paid. College athletes should be paid for playing college sports. Cause they don't no money, no job, and they risk getting hurt. College athletes shouldn't be paid for playing sports. Cause their scholarship is already paid for. Because they chose to play that sport. There is a whelming amount of supporting evidence about should athletes be paid.

Also, college athletes should not be paid because that is not the purpose for going to college. Many argue that is not he purpose for going to college. Many argue that going to college is not for money but for education (should college...1). They should not be paid because playing a sport is not a job. Students go to college to take classes to later have a career. Also, not all colleges make enough money for all of the athletes to be paid (“Should College...1”). There are a ton of athletes that participate in many sports in college. There are too many athletes at a college for all of them to be paid.

One of the biggest controversies going on in America, especially within sports, is whether college athletes should or should not be paid. As it stands now, college athletes are not being paid with actual money. Instead, they are rewarded with athletic scholarships. NCAA and colleges believe that their athletes should not be paid due to their amateur status. However, college athletes should be paid because they don’t have time to get jobs, they may lose their scholarship, and they make a lot of money for their school.

College sports are well loved by many people. They display the youth and agility of college students, but they also display why college is there to help them get better for the pros. There are many events in college sports such as March Madness or the BCS Football Championship which are very well loved and have millions of viewers. However, there has been an issue with college sports and whether or not the athletes should be paid for doing college sports. My stance on the case is that I believe that college students should not be paid for competing in sports.

College sports are extremely popular in the United States. Sports bring millions of dollars to the university, but it has caused compromise in academic standards and disadvantage students who don’t participate. College administrators, and coaches don’t want their star athlete to not able to play because academics. They want their team to, and who would not? College sports should not mean you do not need to have good academics. Students in college sports should not have these advantages because it not fair for those who try hard. College sports does have a place in college because it provides many scholarships to those who need them, but it should not fake grades.

There are people who believe that sports have no official place in college. Student athletes are compromising academic standards and have an advantage over students who don’t participate in sports. However, a study done by Sport Center’s sports science

Beron and Alex R. Piquero (2016), student-athletes with the lowest average grades disclosed they concentrated more on their sport than academics and viewed themselves as athletes more than students. The academic community (i.e. deans and university presidents) and the athletic community (i.e. college coaches and athletic directors) have battled over eligibility requirements, the advising of student athletes, and requirements for athletic scholarships. This incredible fascination with sports has turned it into quasi-religion for many. Those who are entertained and those who profit from sports have internalized this fascination with sports and passed it on to the students of America. The logical sequence of this fixation with sports continues from high schools to colleges, and then to professional sports. The concern then is has athletics become a more compelling force than academics in American high schools and especially universities. Is there an overemphasis placed on athletics in high schools and mainly universities? According to Robert A. McCormick and Amy Christian McCormick (2006), the NCAA has used the term “student-athlete” to characterize athletes that are a part of its member universities. As stated above, student-athletes with the lowest average grades disclosed they concentrated more on their sport than academics and viewed themselves as athletes more than students (Beron & Piquero, 2016). Are they really “student-athletes”? Is there more emphasis placed on being an athlete than being a student? On one hand, it is viewed sports participation has a negative impact on academics because sports participation is over-emphasized and academic performance is under-emphasized. Conversely, a study conducted by Ralph B. McNeal, Jr. (1995), found positive effects between sports and a lower likelihood of dropping out of high school. Another study conducted by Andrew Yiannakis and Merrill J. Melnick (2001), found positive effects of sports