The two hospitals that I have chosen in my area are Columbus Regional Hospital and Johnson Memorial Hospital. The three different medical conditions selected are Stroke care, Pneumonia care and blood clot prevention. On evaluating the quality measures, one can easily get a clear picture of which hospital should be favored under which disease condition. From the patient point of view, it provides an easy comparison in tabular form and as well as graphical form. I have selected 3 medical conditions and on comparing, Columbus Regional Hospital should be preferred option. How do the hospitals compare using these measures and how do you explain the differences?
Using these measures, a hospital can understand where they stand among other hospitals in terms of providing quality care. This can help them to improve quality of care and also understand competitive advantage. The hospitals can find out whether they have the desired percentage and then compare its position with respect to other hospitals or hospital state average and national average (hospital). A lower percentage can help them to do a root cause analysis and help them in improving their percentage by adopting to strategies that will benefit them. An above average and good percentage will encourage and motivate them to achieve stability. The comparison is made not only on the basis of medical condition but also on wide range of categories like complications, Readmissions and deaths, payment and value of care etc. This
NHS quality improvement programs main purpose is to collect and review data entered in order to recognize the opportunities to improve business operations in healthcare. To bring changes in quality, it is necessary to respond to patient’s ideas and implement them for the better results. The key issues that are to be considered for quality-improvement NHS program, as it moves forward are the needs for the patients, necessity of the funds for quality improvements, needs of the service providers and expectations of the community. Outcomes for people and also change expertise. And to improve business operations in healthcare and also recognize opportunities.
Healthcare is in a constant state of change with movements that impact rates, access and quality of care. Hospitals have become more competitive due to the rising cost of care delivery and the reduction in reimbursement from payers. This causes difficulty in delivering quality care to all patients, which is being measured by mandated patient perception surveys, Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS). HCAHPS scores are part of value
Satisfaction scores are based on the percentage of participants scoring a question given with the highest possible response such as “definitely yes or always”. These scores are then used to make improvements to the services that the hospital provides. The marks are compared to other hospitals in the area with the same specialty service during the period of July 2016 until December of 2015. The Sterling Heights Medical Center location scored above average in the following areas: Overall satisfaction with the physician 88.2 % with the other Michigan hospitals scoring 87.0%. How well the patient’s pain was controlled was 84.7% with other local hospitals scoring 80.9%, and the nursing care satisfaction was 89.5% with other local hospitals scoring 88.2%. Henry Ford Hospital is located on W. Grand Blvd in downtown Detroit was one of the HFHS locations that scored below average as compared to other Southeast Michigan Hospitals. The results are as follows: Overall satisfaction with physician was 84.9% with local hospitals scoring 87.0%. How well the patient’s pain was controlled scored 75.5% as compared to 80.9%, and nursing care came in at 83.3% with the local average being 88.2% (Patient Satisfaction Survey,
What is HEDIS? This abbreviation stands for the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. This information set has morphed in its usefulness since 1991, where it was first termed the “HMO Employer Data and Information Set” (AHRQ, 2010). Since its inception, this information has been used by a majority of the country’s health care plans to evaluate performance. Today, the data sets allow for evaluation and more fluid comparison of certain areas of care and service. Furthermore, HEDIS comprises eighty-one measures that spans over five domains of care. Due to this amount of information gathered, stakeholders are given the opportunity to compare different plans in similar terms. In addition, the healthcare plans have the availability to view their own rankings to make necessary adjustments. The data sets are also examined to assess which plan is best for employers and employees based on specific needs. This data is also utilized when seeking accreditation and is now a powerful reimbursement tool. The HEDIS results are accessible for stakeholders via Quality Compass, which is a web-based tool that allows one to view and compare benchmark information (HEDIS, 2015).
This paper will describe current quality outcome measures and the significance for improving medical care. Organizational accountability and transparency has improved with the emergence of Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) programs and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPs). This article will review the role of the nurse manager in creating a culture for quality care as well as the nurse for meeting organizational and patient expectations. Organizations like The Joint Commission (JC), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and The American Nurses Association (ANA) have been critical in establishing standards for quality. This paper will also report on the most recent hospital statistics and steps taken to improve HCAHP scores and reduce readmission rates at the University of Tennessee Medical Center in Knoxville (UTMCK). Statistics at UTMCK will also be compared to the Tennessee and National averages found on the Medicare website Hospital Compare. The aim of this paper is to explore if healthcare system initiatives are improving quality and enhancing patient outcomes.
Quality of service should be one of the most important and well monitored goals for any medical facility, from your small town family doctor’s office, to nursing and rehabilitation facilities, all the way to large hospital systems. The quality of service provided in a facility doesn’t just affect the patients. Quality of service also affects the bottom line, or whether or not the hospital system is profitable. In order to better access the system’s current quality of service and to devise improvement plans I would need to explore issues that have significant effect on quality of care such as, patient satisfaction and retention, medical errors
At Fort Madison Community Hospital they are focus at continuing improving quality service and managing care within the facility. To do this they have to measure accurately by different methods of quality improvement strategies. The managers also have to look at information technology applications and use benchmarking, milestones to help manage quality improvement to have a more effective facility.
The Performance measurement strategies that continue to support and participation in the Hospital quality allowance.
Identifies areas for improvement, helps stimulate performance to gain a competitive edge. Also, benchmarking can improve efficiency, performance, and quality, and provides motivation to staff, thereby, decreasing costs and improving patient outcomes. Therefore, benchmarking is identifying the highest standards of care that can provide organizations with excellent performances in care.
In any continuous quality improvement effort, measurement is the key element (Sollecito, & Johnson, 2013). “Measurement and statistical analysis are used to assess the impact of an improvement effort” (Sollecito & Johnson, 2013). To Measure the impact of the program, the hospital utilized a departmental quality improvement assessment with a scoring matrix for self-assessment (McLaughlin, et. al., 2012). The scoring matrix consisted of five category ratings which each department head had to complete. Univer4sal Charting and Resource Utilization were also used for measurement (McLaughlin, et. al., 2012).
Patients deserve the best possible care we can provide to them. A patient or family may not always agree or like what their provider is telling them, but they deserve to have honest, excellent skilled, excellent bedside manner every day and every time. So how do measure “good care” in a
Quality measures are strategies that gauge, evaluate or compute health care processes, results, discernments, patient insight, and administrative structure. In addition, quality measures are frameworks that are connected with the capacity to deliver first-class health care and/or that are able to identify with one or more quality objectives for medicinal services. These objectives include: compelling, protected, effective, quiet focused, impartial, and opportune consideration. Quality measures can be used to measure quality improvement, public reporting, and pay-for-reporting programs specific for health care providers (CMS.gov, 2016). There are an assortment of quality measures in which health care organizations can use to determine the status of the care they are delivering. Many are appropriate, but few are chosen for this research paper. Among them are: National Health Care Surveys, Hospital IQR Programs, Scorecards, and Political, Power, and Perception/Data for Decision-making tools.
All of the quality indicators are important for hospital quality but the in-patient quality indicators for mortality rates are essential for better care. Research has shown that mortality indicators varying across different hospitals and suggests there could be deficiencies in quality of care that is causing this wide range. Therefore the mortality rates as quality indicators are important to provide better quality of care across our
These measurements provide feedback of a patient’s experience with the care offered at a given hospital. These measurements assess a wide range of factors including interpersonal aspects of care, clarity of - and ease of access to - information provided by the physician, speed of medical staff’s response to the patient’s urgent care needs, among other factors. These measurements are used by patients in their subjective evaluation during their process of choosing a hospital for emergency care or
Quality indicators enable the health care system to identify inferior care in both process or outcome and structure while enhancing quality improvement in health care (De Vos et. al, 2009, p.1).