preview

Columbus To Acosta Thesis

Better Essays
Open Document

Butzer, Karl W. “From Columbus to Acosta: Science, Geography, and the New World.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers Vol. 82 No. 3 (Sep., 1992) 543-565.
Ford, Thayne R. “Stranger in a Foreign Land: Jose de Acosta Scientific Realizations in Sixteenth Century Peru.” The Sixteenth Century Journal Vol. 29 No.1 (Spring 1998) 19-33. Karl W. Butzer (a professor of Geography at the University of Texas at Austin) argues that the agents of the European encounter with the Americas triggered scientific advancements in “From Columbus to Acosta: Science, Geography, and the New World.” Thane R. Ford (a professor at Brigham Young University) contends that Acosta is an example of how the New World challenged Jesuit cosmology of the Renaissance …show more content…

Another objective of Ford’s is to use Acosta to highlight that the Spanish interest in the New World was not purely economically or ideologically related. Some Spanish theologians (like Acosta) who ventured to the New World were interested in acquiring scientific and geographical knowledge. Ford contends that Acosta’s Historia is an example of “how the New World challenged and contradicted Jesuit cosmology of the Renaissance” as well as being “an example of how New World phenomena added to the body of general scientific understanding” (22). Acosta’s observations in the New World enabled European scientists and theologians to explain the presence and uniqueness of animals in the New World in scientific and religious terms. Acosta demonstrates how theologians reconciled science with orthodoxy during the Renaissance. Ford’s main conclusion is that Acosta had to harmonize his Jesuit cosmology with the New World and that Acosta contributed to the development of scientific knowledge and methods in

Get Access