Comey Memo For Trump Analysis

Journalism has been around since the 1700’s so you can only imagine how many journalists have existed since then. According to the New York Film Academy, “Robert Upshur “Bob” Woodward is an American journalist who is undoubtedly one of the most celebrated journalists of this century after having exposed the

These memos are an accumulation and explanation of events of torture or as the CIA calls Enhanced Interrogation. “The basic problem with the presidency is the possibility that the occupant of the White House is too unconstrained and can all too easily engage in dramatic exertions of power, especially in the realm of foreign policy" (Pp.107,Levinson) The President is the Commander In Chief of the military. The president is the highest rank in the military and most of the time has no military training with rein over it. The President might not have the right to go to war, but he certainly has the privilege. Regarding presidential removal, Levinson has section titled “On Malfeasance and Misfeasance: Why Criminal Presidents Less of a Threat than an Merely Incompetent Ones”(pp.114-21). In this section, He explains in Great Britain, that the prime minister can be “unceremoniously dumped”(p116,Levinson) In the United States, that is not an option. In the cases of going to war without consent, it could be interpreted that He has the authority over the military so he needs to make the ultimate decision for them. We need to have criminal charges for the declaration of war, so if we made it law he can’t do instead of about what he can do, then maybe more control will be held by the people and not one man.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Education Secretary Betsy DeVos issued an official memorandum today indicating that she would like the nation’s schools to “get back to the basics” and to “focus on what really matters in students’ lives.”

James B. Comey refers to the trade-offs as the evidence that will never be found by law enforcement due to Fourth Amendment restrictions. He makes emphasis in how important it is for society that their Four Amendment rights be respected. Evidence obtained by law enforcement during a Fourth Amendment search or seizure might never be useful because it would constitute to a violation of privacy rights, therefore, it would be refused in court. There have been, however, exceptions to the rule. Sometimes even without a warrant, police have been able to obtain additional evidence, depending the circumstance. Coney’s main point is that with the increase of cyber-threats, those who belong to law enforcement will struggle to perform their jobs, due to

Nunes' 10-question letter also calls out former President Barack Obama and demands officials answer whether he was aware of the dossier prior to Jan. 5, 2017, which is when former FBI Director James Comey said he told him.

Comey has a lot of enemies in Washington, DC and the President and Attorney General Jeff Sessions may well have viewed his recent error-filled testimony -- in which he misstated by a huge order of magnitude the number of Hillary Clinton emails Huma Abedin had forwarded to her husband, Anthony Wiener -- as the cover they were looking for to fire him at minimal political cost.

The background of the investigation is that Russia is being accused of hacking election systems and the emails accounts of Hillary Clinton's staff members. If Russia has the capability to hack America’s computers and rig votes, then this is a political issue, as the integrity of the American voting system has been jeopardize and President elect Trump may have not be the choice of the people. President elect has expressed deep admiration for Vladimir Putin, therefore he as alternate view of President Obama’s order to investigate. He has compared the order to Past President Clinton February 18, l998, statement in which he said Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. President elect disagrees with the order has chosen to compare it to a very bad time in our countries history. An article about President elect response was issued on December 9, 2016, it was written by Josh Gerstein, Jennifer Scholtes, Eric Geller and Martin Matishak, it is Trump breaks with Obama, intel agencies on election hacking. Information about Iraqi and the weapons of mass destruction can be found in CNN report of February 18, 2016 by James

Secondly, Trump told reporters that he had confidence in Comey only to fire him less than

Memorandum To: Professor Alex Siwiecki From: Cole Awasthi CA Subject: Significance of Memo Genre Date: February 24, 2018 The Washington Post published an article entitled “James Comey’s Memo Has Shaken A Presidency. Here’s Why Memos Have Always Mattered.” It detailed the records kept by former FBI Director James Comey in the wake of his firing scandal. The article started out by discussing the politics associated with the situation, but also delved into the history of the memory format. As it turns out, Comey kept a record via memo format about some of the requests made of him from the President of the United States. These memos detailed accounts of meetings that made Comey uncomfortable or those that he felt crossed a line professionally.

Comey presented a two-page memo that states in explicit terms that the premise of the controversy is entirely illegitimate in regards to violating what is stipulated under federal law, and that he was reportedly exhausted with continuing investigations into what he claimed to be a marginal privacy error that is being invited an unwarranted amount of congressional and public scrutiny (Kelly). Keep in mind, within the same article, VICE NEWS also asserts that they have consistently filed FOIA lawsuits pertaining to the questionable methodologies in what is permitted to be disclosed to the media and the public audience (Kelly). There seems to be a conflict of bias hidden here, and while both Vice News and James Comey do have statements that seem logical at first glance, there is rhetorical devices in both Comey’s appeal to common sense, and the clearly evident self-promotional agenda to generate controversy over a contemporary, and arguably profitable in terms of reader subscription, political affair that begs the question as to whether or not normative ethical scruples are applicable to representatives of the government presiding over the United States of

Former Rep. George Miller (D-CA) was absolutely floored by Trump’s shameless testimony. He said, “In my 19 years here, I don’t know that I’ve heard more irresponsible testimony…” Miller was irritated that Trump suggested that he had “additional knowledge of the extent of organized crime beyond what the FBI, the IRS, the Treasury, and others have suggested (during the same hearing).” In addition, Miller responded, “You don’t know this; you suspect this perhaps…” Trump’s accusations were in complete opposition to all of the credible authorities at that hearing. In fact, that same hearing featured written testimony from Jim Moody, the FBI’s former Chief of the organized-crime section. “The FBI does not see a ‘coordinated, concerted effort’ by organized-crime families to raid the Indian gambling industry,” wrote Moody. “As legalized gaming spreads throughout the United States, we are seeing that those states with strong regulations and enforcement are not experiencing an influx of organized crime activity.”

The New York Times includes important sources thato help the reader feel more secure about the information given. The type of propaganda that the journalists Mark Landler and Jonathan Weisman often used thewas Testimonial device. The New York Times’ quotes in the article were by people who are well- known by the populace. A quote stated by someone who is well recognized generally helps the reader believe what is being said versus a quote by a person who is not well recognized. This is why Landler and Weisman decided to include President Obama and Secretary of¬ State John Kerry in for quotes in their article. By using these individuals, it also links the story and helps verify the information that was given to the targeted audience. End The Lie’s article had numerous quotes, but some were by recognizable people and others were anonymous. Having an anonymous source in an article is skeptical because anyone could have said it, and that person may not know much about the Russian proposal or the any other diplomatic path that is trying to be focusedsolutions. Also, on or the journalist could have easily added their own opinion by quoting themselves and hiding behind an anonymous source.

In his first point Mr. Thomas claims that there is no need to be concerned with important information accidentally being betrayed. He states “All members of the media are willing to hold back information that might jeopardize security”(342). This is just simply not the case, however. For example, in 2003, Geraldo Rivera bent down and began writing in the sand. This writing turned out to be information that was not yet supposed to be disclosed. ''At one point, he actually revealed the time of an attack prior to its occurrence,'' Lt. Mark Kitchens, a spokesman at Central Command(Carr 2003).” Thomas even contradicts himself in the very same paragraph by making us aware of two reporters that had their privileges revoked during Vietnam (342).

Ashley Simons "Secrecy and a free, democratic government don't mix," President Harry Truman once said. Harry Truman understood the importance of an open government in a free society. Unfortunately, George W. Bush has a different outlook. From the first days of his administration, President Bush has taken steps to tighten the government's hold on information and limit public scrutiny of its activities. Expansive assertions of executive privilege, restrictive views of the Freedom of Information Act, increasing use of national security classification, stonewalling in response to congressional request for information – all these were evident even before the September 11 attacks (At Issue: Has the Bush administration misused government

“Different testimonies by intelligence agents declared that Russia definitely made efforts to interfere with the Presidential Election” (Osnos et al. 3). On November 9th, 2016, Donald J Trump was elected the 45th President of the United States by popular vote. After much confusion on the turn out of the election,