Tracing To The Farrell Construction Site

This evening I received a phone call from Corporal James Suess regarding an off duty law enforcement contact he had this evening with San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department Rancho Cucamonga Station. Corporal Suess stated that he called SBSO to his residence this evening due to an ongoing dispute he is having with one of his neighbors. This evening Corporal Suess observed that his neighbor had mounted a camera on his own property but in such a way that allowed his neighbor to view and record what was taking place in Corporal Suess’s home. During the course of the investigation the deputies discovered that Corporal Suess also had camera in his yard facing his neighbors home. Due to this SBSO completed a 647.6 PC /Annoying or Molesting a Child Under

I, Deputy John Arnold, was dispatched to 3344 West 83rd Street South in Creek County, Oklahoma in reference to an unwanted subject. Dispatch advised a white male wearing a pink back pack was at the residence and was not leaving. Dispatch identified the unwanted subject as Defendant NOAH STINSON.

The burglar may decide to pick a lock or climb through an open window. There does not have to be full entry for one to be guilty of burglary. The most important aspect is that the entry occurs without the consent of the property owner. Initially, burglary was defined as an offence of unauthorized entry into private homes but now a wide range of buildings and structures fall under the definition. The intent to commit a crime in the structure is the third and last element of burglary. It differentiates a burglary from the crime of breaking in. The elements of the crime burglary highlight that the purpose of the law is to protect homes and businesses against such attacks. Burglary safeguards private property by criminalizing unlawful entry where the entrant has the intent to take property (Millie, 2005). This is why it is immaterial whether property is taken or not during a

I read Inmate Carter his Miranda Rights from a MCSO standard issue Miranda Rights Card. I asked Inmate Carter if he understood his rights, and he replied, “Yes.” I asked Inmate Carter if he would voluntarily answer my questions and he again replied, “Yes.”

On Friday, August 12, 2016 at approximately 1000 hours, I assisted the patrol division in locating a burglary suspect that entered the residence of 1023 Barn Oak Court. The complainant/victim Nicole Smith stated to the Conyers Commutation that when she entered the front door of the residence, she heard an unidentified noise in the back bedroom. As she entered the rear bedroom the subject exited the residence through the rear window.

On 07-05-2017, at approximately 1611 hours, I responded to a man down call that Officer Steffa B2480 made to Security Control in Durango 7 B pod bathroom of the Durango jail located at 3225 W. Gibson Ln. Phoenix AZ 85009 for an attempted suicide. As I arrived on scene I noticed that Inmate Olson, Russell T376200 had cut his wrists multiple times with a razor blade during razor distribution.

On 04-11-2017 at approximately 1500hrs, I conducted an investigation on a stolen bike that was taken from Holmes Foods (101 S. Liberty Avenue). I made contact with the owner, who was identified as Ricardo Perez (TX-ID # 18515108). Perez informed me that his bicycle had been taken from his place of employment without his permission. Perez advised he chained the front tire to the frame to prevent anyone from riding off with the bicycle, but failed to secure the bicycle to the bike rack. Perez advised upon leaving his place of employment, he noticed his bicycle missing from where he parked it. Perez notified his supervisor, who informed Perez that he would review the security cameras. On 04-11-2017 I reviewed the security cameras on property

I then made contact with the defendant and read him his Miranda rights by my agency issued card. Post Miranda read by card the defendant stated "I did return the shoes with an old receipt, I need the money to help my dad because he just had a stroke." The defendant also admitted the the concealment of the other items and stated "I have a drug problem, I need

On 11/03/2016, Robert Stanley on behalf of his employer Hennessy Construction contacted the Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report burglary of a conveyance, a grand theft, petit theft and criminal mischief at a construction site.

Karen was walking outside and saw that the post lamp at the end of the driveway was knocked over. The post lamp was attached to a brick pillar next to the drive to light of the driveway. the post lamp was knocked over with a large cement block that was next to the driveway. I arrived and noticed the cement block was on the ground next to the post lamp. I took photos of the damage and will place onto a compact disk as evidence. Karen said she did not have security cameras on her property. There are no suspects at this time.

I responded to Kersey Termite control in reference to a criminal mischief call. Upon arrival, I made contact with Terry Kersey. Kersey stated that his son(Max Kersey) came to the buisness Monday morning around 6:00 a.m and noticed that a window was busted out, a door knob knocked off and the window A/C unit was pushed through the window. Max also stated that his fillet kife was missing. The knife was loicated outside of the building. Max stated that there were a lot of valuable items inside, which made hoim think the offenders didn’t make entry to the room. Max also stated that there wasn’t anything damaged when he was there the day before.

The Miranda warnings are to be read to all suspect in custody who are interrogated (Hall, 2015). Officer Norman violated the suspect Fifth Amendment rights when failing to Mirandized him after continuing to question his motives pertaining to the crime. The United States Supreme Court decided in 1966, that the historic case of Miranda versus Arizona acknowledged that whenever a suspect is detained in police custody, before being interrogated, he or she must be informed of their Fifth Amendment rights (Hall, 2015). As a result, this right gives the suspect the freedom from making any self-incriminating statements by informing them they have the right to remain silent. In this scenario, the Miranda warning should have been given when the suspect

The definition of burglary in South Carolina is straight forward, consistent with most state statutes. This includes, but is not limited to: home, business, warehouse, garage, tool shed, dog house, etc. Burglary occurs when anyone enters a structure with criminal intent and without the owner’s consent. It bears mentioning that the above represent two “elements”, and both of these elements are necessary for one to be charged with burglary.

The opinion stated that the two-step interrogation technique of waiting until the suspect had confessed to relay their Miranda warnings served to render the warning ineffective, so the statements that followed as a result of the strategy were inadmissible. The mere recitation of the Miranda warning

This paper presents statistics on major factors that affects the property crime rates in the U.S.