preview

Commission's Complaint Analysis

Decent Essays

FIntroduction Plaintiff’s Response to Commission’s Complaint You recently wrote me about the Commission’s Complaint filed upon my behalf. After careful review of your drafted complaint, I conclude that there were eight errors in comparison to my original complaint filed with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. Change in the substance with errors This drafted Commission’s Complaint has modified the spirit of Complaint Affidavit with Exhibits filed with the Commission on August 25, 2015. 43 P.S. Section 959 (a) says “Commission is to not modify the substance of the complaint”. These eight changes in compliant fail to conform to Commission regulations from dismissing the religious discrimination claim to excluding the ten exhibits. A check up on the …show more content…

The Complaint eliminated the “essential” job description and responsibilities, for instance, working with the accountant, maintaining accounting records, reconciling bank statements, etc (Exhibit F). (For the record, the Employment Opportunity does not include any educational requirements.) Commission changed legal argument My affidavit has one line with subsections to describe my education and experience. The Commission’s Complaint, however, contains separate lines for each description. (Commission’s Complaint, Lines 9-13). For that reason, the Commission makes the discrimination charge centered upon my work experience. This error in the Complaint would change the legal argument unsupported by the facts of the case. No interview was held by the church. Change the method of contact for job interview Robinson phoned me for the job interview (Affidavit at line 13). But the Commission makes a broad statement of my contact with Robinson, which makes it a question of whether she actually called me for a job interview. The exhibits withheld from

Get Access