Common Core In Today's School System

The modern day has brought upon many improved aspects, whether technological, medical, or even personal details, but also many defective facets, such as the topic of issue, Common Core Standards. The system that seems to not work in some places, but continues to stay. The Common Core Curriculum is a set of standards that a student has to be “proficient” in by the end of the school year, and the standards vary by state. It also tests students by having them do benchmarks, so they can show the teachers that they are where they need to be. Many claim that these standards will improve the education, career, and life of the students that are in the program, but is it truly the case? With three main flaws in the system, such as how cursive writing

In the article, “9 Reasons Why Common Core is Bad for Education” James Bascom addresses the problems with Common Core and standardized testing in the education system. James Bascom published his article on January 20, 2016 on the TFP Student Action website. Throughout the article, Bascom talks about the negative effect the change in the education system has on students and their parents. He addresses the way that Common Core bunches children together holding some back while challenging others too much. Teachers are often too set on teaching exactly what the core has lined out that they rarely stray from the plan. He outlines how the core has held students back from learning more and expanding upon their education.

Launched in 2009, the Common Core state standards have done nothing to help students progress their learning abilities, and have even harmed their ability to be educated. With Common Core, teachers must follow strict guidelines on what to teach and how to teach it, but this one-size-fits-all ideal does not apply to the real world. Former teacher, Susan Rakow,

Ultimately, Common Core is not the education our children need. Students need a mixed curriculum of learning, with the intention that they will recognize what their passions are, and not just how well educated they are in general subjects. Having knowledge in these subjects are extremely important, however only emphasizing on certain subjects narrows the child’s ability to learn more. The Common Core standards prevent students from that excessive knowledge they would have, and only focuses on how well they can think on a test. Despite the elaborate plan Common Core presents to raise the educational standards in our nation, these same standards will diminish the student’s individualism, as well as inflict stress and anxiety on the child’s

The Common Core State Standards are a state attempt to create strong educational standards. The standard are created to ensure that students in the country are learning and grasping the information that are given in the classrooms for them to succeed academically. The Common Core plan included governors and education commissioners form forty-eight states and the District of Columbia. They wanted to make sure the standards are relevant, logical and sequential. For content all subjects must have critical-thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. Some positive aspects of this policy is that it prepares our students for a competitive global jobs. It can provide national connections in education. Designed to shape the best standards so that all states will be taking a step ahead in education. These standards had been created after extensive research by professional educators for excellence in education. The CCS focus on what students expectations of learning, and achievements. Educators do not need to worry that the standards will make their jobs look redundant because they are in charge of creating lessons to teach their students the content and skills that the CCS demands. The teachers do not feel that the standards are one-size-fits-all. Some negative aspects of the policy are that is a program created by solely the government. The CCS is a program put together on idyllic situations in education by individuals who have subsidy and students ahead of the learning

One of the misinterpretations of the Common Core State Standards is that it is a curriculum and that there is specific criterion in how educators should teach the standards. There is a huge difference between a “list” of things to learn and a curriculum of study. As the author suggests in the article “Rewriting the Common Core State Standards for Tomorrow’s Literacies” people need to veer away from the right or wrong of the standards and focus on what the content of the standards are outlining that educators teach. In other words, breaking down the standards to interpret and reinterpret them and putting those interpretations to work in the classroom are what need to be evaluated (Van Cleave 46). Anyone can access the Common Core State Standards

The Common Core Standards were created in 2010 as an ideal system to help the students of the United States compete with top competitors worldwide. Teachers, standard experts, and other countries studied learning styles internationally to create a system that is supposed to fill the gap in curriculum and the “hole that is a mile wide and only an inch deep” the old system has created (“Myths”). On this new system, state standards will be raised to the highest in 20 years; therefore, no state will have a mediocre curriculum. This means all states will be synchronized to one another, and as Dwyer says, “Parents should know where their child will be from womb to tomb (Nelson).”

As pre-service teachers it is important to keep up to date with the standards and how they can affect our cooperating teacher's students as well as our own future students. It is never too early to start learning information that will improve your ability to increase your ability to teach students better in the long run. Also with all the changes going on with Common Core, it is ever changing and thusly even more important to keep up to date with because these are the guides to which we will be building our lessons upon in the future and really even now. Understanding the Common Core is also a good idea because they can be confusing and starting early gives us a better chance at being able to use them in an effective was in the future by understanding

    Not only is Common Core a stress to students, but also to the people teaching it.  Teachers are now forced to deal with the challenging transition of  teaching a whole new way, and the standards that are given by the Common Core are cursory.  Not being able to teach the way they believe is right could lead to many veteran teachers to become ineffective and bored at their jobs (Meador).  Common Core also brings with it a myriad of topics that have to be taught to the students, which makes the teachers have more on their plates and not able to teach lessons to their fullest (Strauss).  Many superlative

I concur issues that are problems or controversy can teach a person to problem solve critically. Problem-solving is one of the top 10 skills an employer looks for when they are hiring a candidate (Adams, 2014). The main reason educational systems in 46 states, including the District of Columbia and U.S. Territories, have received educating the Common Core educational modules since its educational modules concentrate on showing problem-solving fundamental and critical thinking (Standard in your, 2015). According to Shelling (1960), “a problem or a controversial subject can be viewed as a behavior that is a bargaining process is useful in keeping us from becoming preoccupied exclusively either with the conflict or with the common interest” (p.

The idea behind Common Core is simple: uphold clear parameters as to what concepts students need to understand for their grade-level nationally. It seems like a no-brainer. Every student, no matter his or her background or geographic location, is entitled to the same education, and expected to know the same things by the time they graduate. In this paper I will argue that Common Core standards are necessary in today’s educational system.

Common Core State Standards, often referred to as the Common Core, are requirements in English and Mathematics in grades kindergarten through twelve. Specific focus is on critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Common Core was formed through a joint initiative by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association. To better prepare students for college courses, the standards are implemented in forty-five states and the District of Columbia. Concerns of American schoolchildren, like lacking focus, have shown that students are not learning skills to be used in the general workforce. An accountability system of the Common Core is based on the success of academic standards, advancement of tests based on

Let us take the math problem seven times seven, what does it equal? Seven times seven equals 49 and we know this because during our years in the school system, whether public or private, we are taught the multiplication table in lower elementary. For a student in the public school system, as of 2010, seven times seven does not equal 49, it equals 14 as well. It is a lengthy process to explain, but according to Common Core, if you can prove it, it is correct. This is one of the many reasons students in mainstream public school settings are struggling with simple equations, basic structure of the English language, and a firm grasp on when historical events occurred. The Common Core curriculum holds a bias against individuality in intelligence, it looks to level the playing field instead of allowing people to be challenged. This curriculum has caused much controversy and some states such as Indiana, Alabama, and others are starting to secede from the Common Core due to its pressure to succeed, equality of intelligence, and over complication of the educational system.

The idea behind the Common Core standards is simple: uphold clear parameters as to what concepts students need to understand for their grade-level nationally. It seems like a no-brainer. Every student, no matter his or her background or geographic location, is entitled to the same education, and is expected to know the same things by the time they graduate. In this paper I will argue that Common Core standards are necessary in today’s education system.

The Common Core is simply another attempt to transform education into a “politicized business model” (Hood, 2014). Education should have a balance between both student-centered and teacher-centered instruction. The Common Core destroys both means of instruction, leaving federal regulators with all control. Dennis Van Roekel, the president of the National Education Association, writes in a letter that the “Common Core implementation has been completely botched” (Van Roekel, 2014). His letter addresses the association’s over three million followers, in hopes to dismantle the Common Core. Van Roekel discusses how “the standards seemed like a good idea on the surface, but when put into play, the standards are not customized to the students’ specific needs” (Van Roekel, 2014). The standards simply propose goals students need to meet, however they provide no help in achieving those