Common Core Standards Of Active Learning

understand in this lesson. In the next session we go back to the board and re-cap on to check their understanding about what they said.

Within the last couple of years the Education system was introduced to the Common Core Standards. There are many people that still do not really understand what the Common Core Standards are and what they do. I am one of those people. As an education major, I know some about the Common Core, but there are still some things that I do not understand. The Common Core is set up for Educators to use as a plan that will help them teach and assess how their students are doing. The Common Core is set up across the country. All schools have to follow the Common Core. For each grade level, they have different standards that show the teachers what their students should be able to accomplish by that grade level. Each student will all be assessed and graded

In today’s classroom, it is common to see a teacher monotonously lecturing for the entirety of the class—only stopping to mention when something will be on a test and to list the long homework assignments due at the beginning of class the next day. With so much pressure placed upon teacher’s shoulders to teach the material on the test, very few interactive projects take place—making it easier for students to forget what they have learned. “As students put projects together, create crafts, or use familiar materials in new ways, they 're constructing meaning” (Cleaver). If the Common Core program were to revise its standards and create a more interactive classroom, students would benefit immensely and learn more than the provided test material. It is pointless for a student to go to school to learn, if they will eventually forget everything they were taught after completing the test.

“Common Core State Standards Initiative” is a result of the “Standards and Accountability Movement” which began in the 1990s in the United States. This particular branch of education reforms was geared towards expectations of learning at each grade level. The Standards and Accountability Movement not only brought attention on what students were expected to learn, but on teachers as well – focusing on how teachers were to implement lessons and able to teach for student achievement which would be measured in

Common Core is an initiative that has been implemented in schools across the nation, and is the curriculum that is being taught to school aged children to the high schools. The goal of Common Core is that each teacher, no matter what state they reside, will have a “clear, understandable, and consistent”(Common Core Website) way to teach to students. Through the standards of Common Core students in each grade level throughout the country are taught a uniform curriculum. While the ideals and goals of Common Core seem great on paper they have failed to be implemented in a proper way to actually have use to the students under their restrictions and requirements.

Engaged learning, within a highly supportive environment, enables our students to develop strong communication skills, excel within collaborative settings, effectively address complex problems with innovative solutions, and lead with integrity and compassion throughout their lives and careers in a diverse and rapidly changing world.

Math is a universal subject which the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines as "the science of numbers and their operations, interrelations, combinations, generalizations, and abstractions and of space configurations and their structure, measurement, transformations, and generalizations." Distinctly, the Oxford Dictionaries defines mathematics as “the abstract science of number, quantity, and space.” One thing that is clear amongst both these definitions is that math is complex and cannot be defined so loosely, which is why I find it difficult defining the literacy of mathematics. However, after reviewing the standards, I have attempted to do so. Being literate in mathematics means that one can count, compare and contrast numbers, understand and

With all the hype about the Common Core State Standards, it’s easy to forget that some states have decided not to adopt the standards–plus, some adopting states are now re-evaluating their decisions. Perhaps one of the biggest arguments against the standards is that “while core curriculum has improved performance in states with traditionally good education systems,” states that have struggled academically wonder if the standards are more a one-size-fits-all pathway instead of a “great equalizing force,” in which the common standards bridge a gap between vocational education and the university pathway.

Desks are aligned individually in rows facing a chalkboard. A red-shiny apple is sitting on the teachers table. Along the multi-color walls are students work. In the back corner of the room there are a few computers. Students are prepped to take an online test. No paper, no pencil. The work is all done on a computer. What was the “old” technique of learning has transition into a “new” way. This new tool is a way to improve a students’ education. It has been voluntary adopted by over 40 states. The standards serve as one of the most promising learning method in years in effort to improve our country’s school system. The question is whether the Common Core standard should be implemented as a nation-wide requirement

The Common Core Standards were created in 2010 as an ideal system to help the students of the United States compete with top competitors worldwide. Teachers, standard experts, and other countries studied learning styles internationally to create a system that is supposed to fill the gap in curriculum and the “hole that is a mile wide and only an inch deep” the old system has created (“Myths”). On this new system, state standards will be raised to the highest in 20 years; therefore, no state will have a mediocre curriculum. This means all states will be synchronized to one another, and as Dwyer says, “Parents should know where their child will be from womb to tomb (Nelson).”

New York State adopted Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS) in 2011. The standards identified a set of clear expectations for students, teachers, and parents. This was accompanied by accountability and assessment mechanisms to ensure that the standards were achieved. The initiative was directed towards K-12 students and their level of understanding in English language arts and Mathematics. It was an outcome of changing dynamics and challenges in education that the New York State Education Department (NYSED) adopted Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS). While defining clear standards and outlining outcome expectations the purpose was to effectively prepare students for college and career readiness (Blueprint for English Language Learners (ELLS)

In 2010, the education system in the state of Arizona began to change. The Arizona State Board of Education adopted new standards for school districts to follow and abide by. The new standards known as Arizona’s College and Career Ready Standards (ACCRS) began to be implemented by schools statewide by early 2013. The purpose of the new standards is to be a set of benchmarks (standardized tests) for students of all grades to take and meet as they move through the Arizona school system. The state of Arizona believes that a “consistent framework to prepare students” is through the increased advancement of language arts, social studies (history), science and mathematics.

In this section of your portfolio document, state which of the three grammar website(s) you found most useful

School is a place for social skills and learning and all students do not learn at the same rate as others. Observing others and learning right from wrong from watching others behaviors and the consequences that can occur from them. I think that common core has really changed the whole learning process and made steps to solve problems harder than they need to be. Many argue that it is prep for the SAT’s and the tests that are yet to come in their future years of school. Tracking I don’t think is utilized as it should be many students are still being grouped with students that are not of the same educational level as they are. My child is currently going into 5th grade and has been grouped with children that she basically helps on a daily basis

My case study group are 16 full time, female, level 6 Beauty students at the Ayr Campus of Ayrshire College. All but two are British white and there is one Polish and one Indonesian student, who take a little longer to translate and understand information. This is a third year class but four students had direct entry due to their level of prior educational attainment. I referred five students for PLSPs (personal learning support plans) with inclusive learning team and it has been confirmed that all are dyslexic. We now have support assistance in place for scribes, extra time for assessments and also class notes prepared in different formats depending on each student’s requirements.