Common Themes in Speeches by Passionate Leaders

The west had been essential to the nation’s creation, and exerted its power in Israel. Israel’s leaders developed allegiances with western countries which had been essential in the formation of their country. Tension in the area grew, both inside and outside of the state, and violence was used against both sides. However, measures were not taken to undue the problems that had arisen from the unfair nature of the agreement. “Palestinians had been branded as ignorant, hostile, and violent” and non-Jewish groups found it difficult to practice their religion as they had before. Despite the obvious inequities that were growing, the west did little to alleviate the pain that it played a large part in creating. It seemed as if “People in the west seem so taken with material things, It’s as if they have nothing in their spirit, so they need to surround themselves

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has proven to be one of the most complex and “intractable” conflicts of modern history – or as some may even add – of all time. And after many decades of failed attempts at peacemaking in this region, there still seems to be no conceivable end to the conflict. During those same decades, most of the parties involved as well as the international community have embraced the idea of a two-state solution, but the question we pose today asks whether this solution is still a viable option considering the present context, and if not, is it finally time to consider a one-state solution? This essay will argue that although a two-state solution remains the more

One of the most influential presidents in United States history, John F. Kennedy was a brilliant politician and public speaker. In his inaugural address, he sparked hope around the world by discussing the hardships faced by all of society in the present time and then leaving them with a message of freedom, power, and hope. This measure of impact is not achieved easily; Kennedy masterfully utilized the art of rhetoric to emphasize his message and win the hearts of his people. In the middle of the speech, he discusses the dangers of the modern world and his drive toward international peace and cooperation. These messages are stressed through his use of charismatic language to signify his vision of a new and better world.

Sadat’s controversial appeal to the Israeli’s, addresses the “huge wall between us,” as his perception of the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict incited him on a call to action to bring, in the alliteration “permanent peace” to the Middle East, perceiving that the conflict has gone on long enough culminating in great human costs on both sides. The metaphor of the “huge wall,” evocative of the tumultuous relationship between Arab’s and Israeli’s exemplifies Sadat’s need for the breakage of the “wall”, thus eliciting a level of Blitzer’s exigence so that the warring nations can move forward together, unified. However, despite advocating for a unified future he laments the injustices that have been inflicted on the Palestinian people and thus implores the Israeli’s through his utilisation of Aristotle’s pathos powered by highly modulated words, for the recognition of Palestine and its citizens to have “their legitimate rights…no longer ignored or denied today by anybody,” in order for peace to become an eventual reality. He enforces this sentiment in the hypophora “What is peace for Israel? It means that Israel lives with her Arab neighbours in security,” hence Sadat’s is able to expertly voice his universal plea for stability by challenging Arab and

The relationship between the State of Israel and the United States of America has blossomed into a significant bilateral alliance. The ‘special relationship’ between the two countries has been the driving force behind much of the progress of the United States’ push into middle east democracy, and has helped place Israel in the company of countries who will stand by her in times of trouble. As of late, there have been increasing pushes by the Untied States for Israel to once again enter into peace talks with the Palestinians, a topic which seems to be the source of constant international commentary. These developments have brought to the forefront a rather interesting facet of the Israeli/American relationship, one which this author

The big question we ask ourselves today is, will Israel and Palestine ever agree to stop fighting? The conflict between Israel and Palestine has been traced all the way back to 1948 through 2005 in The Israel Palestine Land Settlement Problem, written by Charles Rowley and Jennis Taylor. However, this conflict did not end in 2005. This article was written in 2006, so anything within the last 10 years is not included. The conflict between the two counties still continues to this day and still remains a major problem. Israelis and Arabs have been fighting over Gaza on and off for decades now. The three issues laid out in this article are the four major wars that took place, the refugee problem, and the conflict between religions. It concludes with the road map to peace. Throughout his whole book, The Israel-Palestine Conflict, Gelvin speaks of the same historical events that occurred between Israel and Palestine, while the article reveals there are still other conflicts, the land settlement problem has been the major conflict between Israel and Palestine since 1948.

This essay will focus on how theorists of peace and conflict have analysed the conflict in recent history. Especially, the peace process after the first Palestinian intifada and the 1993 Oslo-agreements will be analysed. In addition, this essay will shed light on the involvement of the United States in the

Through intellectual and rhetoric qualities, intuitive responses are able to provoke social change. In 1977 on the 20th of November Anwar Sadat’s radical ‘Speech to the Israeli Knesset’ emphasised achieving justice on fair terms, ultimately establishing a basis for international peace and “Peace in the Middle East” during the tense Arab-Israeli conflict. Sadat utilises various devices of repetition to reinforce the main thematic concern of “permanent peace and justice”, expounding Logos through the immense detailed when laying out the conditions for peace. Moreover, as both countries were highly religious Sadat utilises the Pathos of religion to unite individuals, “Muslims, Christians and Jews (who all)

On April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King Jr., American Baptist minister and equal rights activist, was assassinated in a balcony of a motel where he was preparing for a protest of equal rights for all citizens in America. After Robert F. Kennedy, the brother of the late president, John F. Kennedy, have heard the news about the assassination, he gathered a crowd of people to give a speech regarding Dr.King’s death. In this speech he uses two main rhetorical devices, which is pathos and ethos, to calm his audience and to promote the ideas of Dr. King, which is peace among one another.

On May 15, Anwar Sadat, the Speaker of the National Assembly would visit Moscow, where he would be told by the Soviets that Israel had planned to invade Syria during the May 16 through May 22 time frame, all of this would prove to be false. Soviet intelligence cited the fact that Israeli troops parading in western Jerusalem, for Israel’s Independence Day, were doing so without heavy weapons, which they said were being amassed along the northern border with Syria. The reason as it turns out they were devoid of weaponry during their parades is to ease Arab tensions in the area. Sadat would pass this information along to Egypt and President Nasser, who would then parade Egypt’s forces through Cairo along its way to the Sinai Peninsula (Cleveland, 2009).

The Six Day war was a decisive battle along religious, economic, and social lines. This conflict between Israel and the Arab world is not just one of long standing hate, it spans economic and nationalistic ideals. The Six day war itself was merely a consequence of the preconditions already laid in place. This paper will explore the Six Day War as well as its causes and effects.

For many centuries, Judaic and Arabian societies have engaged in one of the most complicated and lengthy conflicts known to mankind, the makings of a highly difficult peace process. Unfortunately for all the world’s peacemakers the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly the war between Israel and the Palestinian Territories, is rooted in far more then ethnic tensions. Instead of drawing attention towards high-ranking officials of the Israeli government and Hamas, focus needs to be diverted towards the more suspect and subtle international relations theory of realism which, has imposed more problems than solutions.

Keeping these thoughts in mind I will investigate some key issues that affect the progress towards peace in the region including the relationship that exists between the United States and Israel; the 2002 Road Map to Peace and why it failed; and finally the effect of Arafat?s death and the implications for the future.

After more than 50 years of war, terrorism, peace negotiation and human suffering, Israel and Palestine remain as far from a peaceful settlement as ever. The entire Middle Eastern region remains a cauldron waiting to reach the boiling point, a potent mixture of religious extremism, (Jewish, Christian and Islamic), mixed with oil and munitions.

the conflict in the middle east between 1948-1973 was not purely fuelled by the interest and concerns of the superpowers but rather of a series of conflictual incidents, aswell as the main wars that took place from the years from 1948-1967 such as the: 1948 War, The Six Day War of 1967 and the Yom Kippur war of 1973. But although the conflict was not fuelled by the superpowers, the influence of the superpowers and the reach of the superpowers into the Middle East was evident in the years both prior and following 1978. But even despite the influence and interests of the superpowers between and including 1948-1967 being undeniably evident, the extent of this influence cannot be said to have “fuelled the conflict”.