Communicating In Groups Summary

In my opinion, group work is a type of cooperative learning that helps people to accomplish a certain task in a faster and more effective manner. Team working also helps to achieve the tasks that are impossible to finish by one individual. However, if people in a group have a lot of conflicts, group work will not be able to achieve as much as we expected. There are many reasons which lead to dissatisfaction in group work such as individualism as well as conflicts in opinion and time.

- There are three main roles that a group member can fill, each with their own variations: task oriented, socioemotional, and destructive.

“When groups are planned so that each member's strengths have authentic importance to the ultimate success of the group's activity, this creates a situation where individual learning styles, skills, and talents are valued, and students shine in their fortes and learn from each other in the areas where they are not as expert.”(Willis)

Group members must build mutual respect for and trust and confidence in one another, so that “feel free to express opinions, test ideas, and ask for, or offer help when it is needed” (Smith, 1983).

There are also plenty of I-inducement and S-submissive types. This helps to give stability to the group and makes for plenty of new and fresh ideas and discussion. There are also a couple of C-compliant types that anchor the group with their attention to detail and ability to focus on the task at hand which can be tedious at times.

16. Alberto can get his group members to agree to participate in a late-night meeting in order to decide on a plan of action before the deadline set by the client. Although most people typically would not be willing to work such late hours, Alberto's team agrees because he has always treated the members well, and they have come to respect

The reason for groups is to join a gathering of individuals to cooperate to finish certain objectives that can't be accomplished adequately by a person. Albeit each colleague's

There are many different kinds of groups that exist between college students that deal with communication they range from sports teams to many community or social groups. The type of organizations that are mostly found in many colleges today are Greek letter organizations. In this paper I will exploring communication within the realm of sororities. First, I am going to start with the history of Sororities, then I am going to write about how important it communication is during what sororities call the pledge process. Furthermore I am going to tell about the different things that sororities have, such as the symbols, colors and different things that may deal with communication. Even though all sororities have different representations for

Group member cohesiveness was absent from the group meeting for several reasons, but the primary reasons were due to the fact that the group members did not have a common description of value or structure to the discussion. Each member viewed their own area of involvement within the organization as being more valuable than any other area, and it was this exclusion of other valuable traits that lead the group to begin to clash in such a

time ever was when me, my mom, my sister, my brother and my stepdad all went out to Chucky

Therefore, a more fitting definition of group for the ‘group of level four Youth and Community Work students at Newman University’ is identified by a list of attributes created by Jarlath Benson. From the attributes she suggests that groups have three key characteristics: “parts, relationship between the parts, and an organising principle.” (2000, p.5). The organising principle with the class group is a desire to complete the degree. Turner (1987) and Brown (1999) highlighted that groups exist in relation to other groups and aren’t just entities in their own right. The class group exists in relation to the tutor group, working groups and friendship groups.

group that functions together. As can be seen from all three books, having a close knit family is

Effective group communications come in forms of verbal and non-verbal techniques. Essential parts of the entire group’s contribution are that the group contains full participating members, the group is diverse, and that the diversity is recognized and respected (Hartley, 1997). In the videos viewed, three were evaluated on the effective and ineffective communication skills of the participants and suggestions made on how they could improve. The videos are titled, “Planning a Playground”, “Helping Annie”, and "The Politics of Sociology.

Tuckman proposes that groups develop via five stages; forming, storming, norming, performing and finally adjourning (Archee, Gurney, & Mohan, 2013a). The first stage, known as forming, involves clarifying the task and purpose of the group, and identifying boundaries of both the task and interpersonal behaviour (Archee et al., 2013a). For the presentation task we were randomly allocated into groups. This worried me greatly as I have struggled in the past with group members who do not contribute equally or see the task as important as other group members. To avoid this problem, the group collectively determined and agreed upon a number of ground rules. For example, we decided that all group members were expected to contribute equally to the presentation, all group members were expected to attend and contribute at all group meetings, and all group members would adhere to agreed upon deadlines. Having failed to do this in previous group assignments, this clarification stage

Each individual is categorized into a group from the day they were conceived. According to Kozier et al (2010) a group is “two are more people who have shared need and goals, who taken each other in account in their and who, thus, are held together and set apart from others by virtue of their interaction” (p. 400). The communicate that takes place between members of the group is group dynamic (Kozier et al, 2010). Motivation for participation and similarity of other group members and the goals of the group will affect the group dynamic (Kozier et al, 2010). The type of group that was created was a task group and Kozier et al (2010) stated that “the focus for such group is completion of a specific task, and the format is defined at the