Essay on Communication

1632 Words 7 Pages

In organisation the employees communicate in different ways, every single day. They have talk in meetings, have group discussions and negotiate over the telephone, they write memos, emails, draft letters, reports, and sending faxes in emergencies. The organisation gives out the advertisement in TV, posters, in store advert and many more count as communication,

Communication is most important base for develop the business, the communication with other department give the right idea of where is business is, this kind of meeting need to held most often in organisation like SPACE, a medium organisation like that have to keep up to date with it’s different departments.

Communication in business can be both formal
…show more content…
- It is costly in terms of secretarial effort, reproduction costs, and delivery time.

Informal Communication: Informal communication is based on the realization that an agency cannot be effective without personal interaction among workers and their voluntary support of organization goals. Informal communication is personal, unofficial, and mostly verbal. Purposes: The purposes of informal communication are to educate through information sharing, to motivate through personal contacts, and to resolve conflicts through participation and friendship. It seeks to involve workers in organizational matters as a means of maintaining their enthusiasm, loyalty, and commitment.
Advantages of informal communication: Proponents of informal communication advocate its use for the following reasons:

- Informal communication is less official and less threatening. It can therefore enhance the flow of new ideas and plans without the fear of ridicule or punishment.

- Informal communication is personal, which imbues it with the enthusiasm and zeal of the participants rather than dry, bureaucratic logic.

Disadvantages of informal communication: On the other hand, informal communication is not a solution for all organizational ills. Opponents of informal communication make the following arguments against its use. - It is too loose and therefore difficult to define or apply systematically.

- It can result in the spread of inaccurate
Open Document