Communication Style Analysis Paper

Communication is one of the main things humans do in their day to day activities. Scholars define communication as an act of exchanging information between one another and understanding the meaning of it (Semenescu, 2016). The four mains types of communication are written, verbal, non-verbal and visual. Humans communicate to establish relationship, build foundation for planning, socializing in general and motivating each other. Communication can vary in different settings. For example in personal context, communication style used is more relaxed, which means that informal language is used. However, in a professional context, communication style used in more focused on workplace. Therefore, the language used is more formal so as to show respect

Communication theories are important to learn and understand. Learning these theories helps us apply the theory to our own life. It helps our critical thinking skills as well as benefits one to understand the value of research that has been accomplished in this field. Understanding communication theories can help us make sense of our daily life experiences. There are three Communication theories that I have studied that have touched on my personal and professional life. These theories are Communication Privacy Management, Social Penetration Theory, and Organizational Culture Theory.

Michael Argyle believed that interpersonal communication was like learning how to drive a car. Michael Argyle said that human communication is important as it is a two way process that involves two people sending and responding to each other’s non-verbal and verbal messages. Argyle came up with the theory of communication. This theory was put in place so that people who are having a one-to-one conversation can understand what they are saying to each other. He also came up with this theory as he believed that communication builds an understanding of listening, observing and reflecting what the other person is saying to them.

There are times where I feel the need to dominate and lead the way such as when working with my dad in his apartment management company. I observe him overruling his tenants and exerting his power to put people in their place and follow the complex rules and regulations, and have somehow manifested those qualities into myself, like in example, if I am at work and he is not there then I do find myself to be quite dominating and exerting my power to get tenants to do what there suppose to do or pay their rent. I also find myself being dominating to people I know are weaker than me or just shy and not outspoken about their feelings. The other style that I was tied with is the conventional scale which measures my tendency to act in a conforming way. These tendencies are characterized by perceiving rules as a source of comfort and security. There is also a preference for staying unseen and unnoticed and a tendency to cover up my mistakes. There is also preoccupation with appearing to be average and just like everyone else. Additionally there is a reduction in originality which is very true for my behavior. These characteristics are also a bit contrary to my power and authoritarian style but somehow I find myself being shy as well as authoritarian in certain situations. I would have to say however that the conventional characteristic is one that I might have to disagree with because

Evaluate how learning and development can improve own work, benefit organisations, and further own career

Communication is an important part and concern in many organizations. With many organizations having such a diverse workforce communicating has an impact on how well employees, patient and family members interact together. Many communication issues arise due to the fact that there are many employees from different cultures and different genders. These issues have an impact on how effectively tasks are done within the organization causing concerns with family members, patients and even coworkers. The different individuals that are from different cultures and genders have different ways on which

Hi everyone and welcome to Com 200 Interpersonal Communication! I am Lisa and I currently reside in Elkton, VA for the last 25 years. I am from Adams, Ma, and I enrolled in Ashford University to obtain my BA in Business Administration in view to open a business of my own when I graduate. At the current time of enrollment it was in hospitality although, since then several different agents have approached me in the Insurance business. The owners asking me to take over their books and run the business when their agents retire around my area. It will require a few licenses; otherwise, I have looked into this position and have thought about this avenue as opportunity to take my degree in this direction as well. My motivation for returning

‘XXXX is very much in the affiliative style of leadership. Sometimes she will put peoples’ feelings first, putting their feelings ahead of the task in hand for fear of causing conflict. I feel that sometimes XXXX needs to move away from that style of leadership and progress more into a democratic and authoritative style. XXXX will know what needs to be done or changed but will refrain from putting the idea or solution forward in fear of upsetting her colleagues. Although when XXXX does move into the democratic space she can be very persuasive at getting team buy in and can be open to other team member ideas and suggested solutions.’

The third supporting pillar is laissez-faire, or non-interference policy. Too autocratic style of leadership may create anxiety and fall of motivation within the staff. Laissez-faire style makes employees fell content as management outlines main guidelines while subordinates are free to make decisions within those guidelines. The positive outcome of this style may become enhancement of efficiency. In case of IKEA, staff is more motivated.

The communication style I use can be described as an assertive style. The assertive style is beneficial where I have confidence of communicating with others in a honest and direct way. When communicating with coworkers or group members I would protect my own rights and respect their rights to get the work done in the business. I will ask directly to them for any questions or assistance to get the assignment done and accept if they are not able to help at the moment. In order to complete the assignment without assistance from others, I would make an attempt to solve it myself and take responsibility for my actions without hurting others. I understand that when I make a choice to help others with an assignment to get the work done, I am held

In this week, I learned that a lot of my classmates or the people that my classmates talk about in there primary task, have different communication styles. Amanda Headly mentioned a communication style that I can relate to and that is passive style. I will sometime let other people say anything to me and I don't say nothing back. Sometime I feel the things that they say to be disrespectful or hart my feelings do not need a response back, so I just go on about my day. In Rosemary Arline primary task, she mentioned different communication as well and the one that I can relate to is assertive style. When I have something very important or a sensitive matter to discuss, I rather discuss it face to face to that individual. Sarah Tucker comment on

← Autocratic leaders are task-oriented and focused. Their style tends to work well where there is a need for a lot of structure, with the non-routine and complex tasks, or where there is a production emphasis.

When under pressure this character has the tendency to force-fit solutions when instead they should take the time to analyze their position and relax. This personality type has many positive leadership traits and is a very good description of the dominance style.

With that being said, a couple of areas of focus for my own development would be emphasizing deadlines, scheduling and prioritizing activities in coordination with the actions among multiple subordinates. After a deep dive review to better understand the feedback, I was able to narrow down the gaps and identify, that there are

Two of the most prevalent forms of communication styles are direct and indirect communication; these two communication styles impact how members of a culture interact with each other (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). According to Craddock (2002), Kierkegaard, regarded direct communication, “as the mode for transferring information and considered it totally appropriate to the fields of history, science, and related disciplines” (p. 70). Direct communication can be defined as, “speech that specifically states and directs an action. When someone hears direct speech, they know immediately what needs to be done. There is no question about who is in charge, and usually no need for discussion” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). On the other hand, Kiergaard believed that, “the indirect was the mode for eliciting capability and action from within the listener, a transaction that did not occur by giving the hearer some information” (Craddock, 2002, p. 70). Unlike direct communication, “a indirect style of speech is not typically authoritative, rather it encourages input from the listener” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). The direct and indirect communication styles are often used in different fields, disciplines, and industries ranging from education, workplace, literature, and entertainment, to church services (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). For example, the population relies on the news media as the main source of information and the basis on which they form their opinions and voting decisions” (Fog, 1999, p.