Communications Psychology: Communication Behavior in Groups

Groups do not always start off fully-formed and functioning. Bruce Tuckman's model of the developmental sequence in small groups suggests that groups grow through clearly defined stages, from their creation as groups of

In my opinion, group work is a type of cooperative learning that helps people to accomplish a certain task in a faster and more effective manner. Team working also helps to achieve the tasks that are impossible to finish by one individual. However, if people in a group have a lot of conflicts, group work will not be able to achieve as much as we expected. There are many reasons which lead to dissatisfaction in group work such as individualism as well as conflicts in opinion and time.

Group communication follows slightly different ‘rules’ to communication in one-to-one situations. There is often more going on in a group, with a number of different people trying to speak, get their point across and their voice heard. Turn-taking can be more complicated; relationships and power issues between group members can also be more complex than in one-to-one contexts. As a communication context, groups can have a number of benefits for participants: • a group can be an effective way of sharing responsibilities • groups can improve decision-making and problem-solving because they draw on the knowledge and skills of a number of

Group communication is getting a small group of people together who share the same problem to talk about it. These work better when the group is small as the leader can interact better than working with a large group. In health care, group communication can range from AA meetings (Alcohol anonymous) to drug abuse to various phobias which people want to overcome. There are a number of factors we need to consider when working with a group, things such as group atmosphere, group leaders, thinking about what you are going to say, taking turns and the use of space.

Tuckman (1965) proposed that when developing teams, groups proceed through four general stages of development, namely: Forming, storming, norming and performing.

Bruce W Tuckman (1965) developed a model to describe the differing stages of team development. He gave us a way of interpreting the various stages groups pass through into making an effective team. As you can see from the illustration below, teams go

Tuckman proposes that groups develop via five stages; forming, storming, norming, performing and finally adjourning (Archee, Gurney, & Mohan, 2013a). The first stage, known as forming, involves clarifying the task and purpose of the group, and identifying boundaries of both the task and interpersonal behaviour (Archee et al., 2013a). For the presentation task we were randomly allocated into groups. This worried me greatly as I have struggled in the past with group members who do not contribute equally or see the task as important as other group members. To avoid this problem, the group collectively determined and agreed upon a number of ground rules. For example, we decided that all group members were expected to contribute equally to the presentation, all group members were expected to attend and contribute at all group meetings, and all group members would adhere to agreed upon deadlines. Having failed to do this in previous group assignments, this clarification stage

Based on the Bevel Up video, there are two scenarios featured on the Bevel Up clip. For the first nurse-client pair with the younger guy, let us label them as Nurse-Client A and for the second nurse-client pair with the older guy in a wheelchair, they will be Nurse-Client B. The nursing care situation for both scenarios is taking place in the streets, which means that it is outside of the typical setting inside the clinic or the hospital. To further dissect the interaction that occurred, we will take a closer look at both Nurse-Client pairs.

When doing so the other group members were active listener, by using their whole body verbally and nonverbal. Like facing the speaker and giving eye contact and try to avoided interruption. The group also acknowledges the thoughts of the speaker by giving constructive feed back. Due to the effectiveness of the group communication, we were able to build trust, respect and understand the issues and make decision for effective change. We illustrate this by coming together as a group one again to accomplish the goal we initially wanted to accomplish. Since the first organization that we had chosen was incorrect, so we had to make the necessary changes to accomplish our goals. The other effective feature is the purpose of the group. Kozier et al (2010) stated that the effective group purpose is when “goal, task, and outcomes are clarified. Understanding and modified so that members of the group can commit themselves to purposes through cooperation” (p.401). For instance, each individual was assign a task and knew what was to be accomplished. As group we all decided to meet at suitable day and time which was beneficial to all team members, because we could commit to the group and focus on what needed to be achieved.

The small group communication is an interpersonal communication within groups between thirty to twenty individuals. It is very important to have a quality communication such as information-sharing behavior and helping attitude among the members of group. The positive attitude and productive relationship between the group members help in increasing the performance of group. For quality communication, all the group members are required to identify with the group and they must participate in interaction and must have strong commitment with the team members.

A group is a living thing, developing over time and adapting to the environment and expectations imposed upon it as it grows. When observed carefully, a pattern of distinct phases emerge in this growth process. It is important to recognize and take advantage of these various stages of development in order to maximize group effectiveness and efficiency. There are several different models for small group development, but Tuckman 's model is "probably the most famous sequential-stage theory" (Johnson & Johnson, 2016, p.27). This paper will discuss the five stages of group development according to Tuckman 's model as well as some practical leadership guidelines that will help a group remain effective

Effective work groups are essential to the survival of any business. As I thought about the groups I belong to I tried to find reason one that was effective that I did not oversee. Unfortunately, the only effective group that this applied to was a group I once belonged to at my previous company. This was the internet marketing group at a Timeshare company. Before I am able to talk about my group specifically I feel it is important to define what it is that makes a group a group.  A group is “Two or more individuals in face-to-face interaction, each aware of the others who belong to the group, and each aware of positive interdependence as they strive to achieve mutual goals” (Johnson & Johnson, 2006). A group needs to integrate the multiple

Group communication is thought of to be the process of acting or responding to information someone else has brought to our attention (Beebe, Masterson 2012). Individuals make up a group when the number of members exceeds two and, although debated amongst researchers, reaches somewhere between twelve and twenty (Beebe, Masterson, 2012). A small group recognizes communication amongst a small group of people who share a common purpose, who feel a sense of belonging to the group, and who exert influence on one another (Beebe, Masterson 2012). Meanwhile, Beebe and Masterson (2012) also explain that a team is a coordinated group of individuals organized to work together to achieve a specific, common goal while maintaining a rather structured sense. It is to our understanding that teams differ from groups in a number of ways including: team goals are often more specific and measureable, roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, rules are expectations are written, and take a lot more coordination and collaboration (Beebe, Masterson 2012). While a primary group exists to meet human’s needs to associate with others, a great example of this would include a group of your college friends, whom have all graduated, meeting up for an informal get together; whereas a secondary group’s main purpose is to accomplish a task or achieve a goal such as a study group that gathers in order to learn and understand information (Beebe, Masterson 2012).

Humans have been forming groups since the beginning of humanity. We are constantly categorized as a group at the basic level as a species, as an ethnicity, and as a society. It is speculated that our success and evolution as a species is based on our ability to work with each other in collaboration on many levels to ensure our survival. Groups have enabled us to get things done efficiently, whether by combined physical effort, mental effort of generating ideas, or support of others. At its most effective, a group is considered a team. Teams are formed when

I feel group development is the one the important thing in organizations and building a team is always plays key role in group development as well as organizational development that four stage model is perfectly suitable for group development in an organization. They are forming, differentiation, integration, and full maturity. Obliging variables are considered.