Communism Never Work

Communism is a “Political theory advocating class war and leading to a society which all property is publicly owned and each person works and paid according to their abilities” After world war 2 communism took over Czechoslovakia and people flocked to join the party. Not everyone was convinced that the party was what the country needed for them to gain peace. The party had lots of propaganda and were in control of peoples live therefore convincing people to join the party even if reluctant. In Under a Cruel Star, Kovaly recounts her time after the war and joining the communist party and then being shunned when her husband was convicted of a crime. She talks about how people put blind faith in a party that didn't have much scientific evidence to back up their claims. Kovaly said the most people went to the communist party because when coming back from the concentration camp they wanted to be in control of property again and they stayed because they felt helpless without the party providing services. They went from one type of totalitarian government to another kind of government that controlled everything they did. People of the time didn't realize that communism didn't benefit people who weren't in an elite class.

The word ‘communism’ originated from ‘commun’, a French term meaning ‘belonging to all’. Before the actual foundation of communist parties and countries, there were people who had desired the theory of shared ownership and equal wealth among society for centuries. The earliest notable people to endorse this theoretical societal system included Greek philosopher Plato and religious leader

“You say individuality vanishes. You must therefore confess that by “individual” you mean no other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of property” (The Communist Manifesto 16) The idea of communism is to encourage people to actually be individuals while being an active member of society.

Communism has always been a word that was never discussed in a positive light. In my high school, which was medium size, mainly democratic, and mainly white, communism was always put down. When I think of a communist society I envision North Korea. A society that most people do not know much about other than the fact that people have zero rights, everything is monitored, only propaganda is released, and it is overall a horrible way of life. The first time my eyes were open up to the idea that communism may not be all that bad was reading Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” and “Estranged Labor.” Marx successfully challenged the critiques put forward on such a controversial topic by defending this idea with relevant points.

As mentioned before communism is the abolishment of the class system and the abolishment of privately owned property.

Communism is not some unverifiable, otherworldly entity, but “itself a Power” (218) already in Europe. The power of communism does not come from arbitrary political systems set up by the bourgeois, but from the natural power of labor and workers.

Growing up in the United States, communism immediately causes people to cringe. Yes many attempts at communist societies have gone horribly wrong, however the motives behind communism are powerful. They hope to tear down the social classes that capitalism forms, they hope to educate women and form a society where the proletariat is paid for their work by the government in order to distribute the wealth evenly. The Communist Manifesto is a political pamphlet explaining the communist beliefs. The Manifesto’s effect on history cannot be stressed enough. It had an immediate impact in 19th century France. The powerful messages embedded within the Communist Manifesto impels people to take action, serving as a driving force in the French Revolution of 1848, and is recognized as the platform for which the Paris Commune based their government off of.

What is communism? Communism is a term used broadly to designate a ‘theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.’ It refers to the doctrine which underlines the revolutionary movement which aims to abolish capitalism and ultimately to establish a society in which all goods will be socially owned, all economic activates socially planned and controlled, and in which all distributions will be in accordance with the maxim. German author Emil Ludwig described the maxim as “for each according to his capacity, to each according to his need.”(1) It is to be distinguished from socialism which aims by constitutional and democratic

Communism is still considered a hard topic to publicly address because for a large majority of Americans, you were taught to fear and hate anything that was associated with the “Red Scare”. From the beginning, Communism has had an issue being adapted widespread because of people’s refusal to forfeit their rights to attain certainty and security. Whereas Democracy and Capitalism have thrived because people want more, they want the opportunity to make something of themselves even if that means they may fail entirely. These points exemplify what Communism is, where it is, how it works, and why there is a better way to govern a country.

I’m sure you all are familiar with the concept of communism, and perhaps how it is the staple of Russia and the society that was the Soviet Union (which failed). However, the Communist Manifesto was composed by two German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published in London in the year of 1848. It essentially says that our lives should be governed by us, and that all property shall be publicly owned. All citizens of the nation must work and are paid according to their abilities and needs. It sounds enticing, sounds like it’ll work. That was the basis of their philosophy. But, a society in which there is an absolute power, in this case the working class, is the fault. It simply won’t work. It breeds absolute corruption. We’ve all probably heard that

A massive black market surfaced, work strikes ensued, and inflation skyrocketed. Mass executions were carried out against those who resisted. Contrary to Karl Marx’s predictions, the livelihood of workers was made insufferable, and millions of citizens met unnecessary death. A second invalid example of effective communism is the early church. To reference a system of communism that doesn’t end in disaster, advocates often claim Acts 4:32-35, in which the people of Jerusalem give their property to the apostles who redistribute it to the community. The reason this is not a viable example of communism that doesn’t result in disaster is because it is not, by definition, communism. The people’s act of sharing their possessions was voluntary, not enforced by the state. Furthermore, sometimes even voluntary communist systems result in failure. Take, for example, the Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony. For a brief while, the Pilgrim colonists managed their farmland collectively. That is, their food, work, and land was distributed evenly. This inevitably resulted communal discord, in which the deadbeats dragged their feet while reaping the rewards of the hard workers, and the work of the dedicated became de-incentivized. To put this problem to rest, William Bradford decided to divide the land to families individually, causing the people to become motivated to produce and provide for their

Communism in the USSR was doomed from the onset. Communism was condemned due to lack of support from other nations, condemned due to corruption within its leadership, condemned due to the moral weakness of humanity, making what is perfect on paper, ineffective in the real world. The end of this system was very violent. It left one of the two most powerful nations in the world fearful of what was to come. <br><br>Communism can either be called a concept or system of society. In a society that follows the communist beliefs groups own the major resources and means of production, rather than a certain individual. In theory, Communism is to provide equal work, and benefits to all in a specific society. Communism is derived from many ancient

Communism is not inherently a bad thing. Through months of research and study in and out of school I have learned that contrary to popular belief, communism does not mean bad. In the simplest terms, communism is an ideology for a government concept in which people are treated equally in every aspect of life. This includes payment for work, social division, and opportunity for an enterprise. On paper, this sounds good to me, and many other Christian Americans as it says in the book of

Furthermore, the restrictive nature of Communism contributes immensely to its lack of viability. In Friedrich Engels’ Communist Confession of Faith, Engels--a peer of Marx’s with whom he worked closely--outlines these restrictive qualities as positive aspects of Communist society. For instance, Engels asserts that, “Every individual strives to be happy. The happiness of the individual is inseparable from the happiness of all,” (Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels). However, he then proceeds to define as essential shifts to the abolition of private property and religion, the former of which is nearly universally seen--by most all save Communists and Socialist--as a natural right of man and the latter serving historically as a driving force of

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;What is Communism? Communism is the doctrine of the conditions of the liberation of the proletariat. It also can be defined as a conceptualized system of government in which resources and production facilities are the property of the entire society rather than individuals. In a communist society, labor is shared equally as well, and the benefits of labor are distributed according to need (Communism.4all 1). No one person shall be ranked higher than another and there is to be one person in charge of the society in a communism government. There are still to this day many countries that fall under the rule of communism and the ways they were transformed under communist rule is quite interesting.