Communism Vs Utilitarianism

In comparison, capitalism and communism are like night and day--opposite of each other in every way, but the main differences in the two can be seen in the distribution of wealth among a society’s peoples and the appearance

     Throughout history, there have been many systems developed in order to have a better society. Two of the most analyzed, and debated systems that have tired to change an economy for the best are communism, and capitalism. Communism, and capitalism have been compared on many levels, such as why they will or will not work, and which one works better. Throughout this essay I will concentrate on the differences, and similarities of how each operates, along with the benefits, and problems that each of them produces.

“From each according to ability, to each according to his contribution”, is socialism’s slogan. Socialism is a social and economic system characterized by common ownership, democratic control, and production for use only. Common ownership means that the resources of the world are owned by everyone thus, nobody can take control of resources beyond their personal belongings. The concept of democratic control means that everybody in a society has the right to participate in the social decisions that affect them. Production under socialism is directly and entirely for use. For example, everyone receives their share of production based on how much they have contributed. After a percent of their share is deducted to go to the common good, workers receive their share of production. Examples of common good is transportation and education, but common good is also used to help those who cannot directly play a part in production like elderly people or children. Socialism works under the assumption that everyone is willing to

However, believers in socialism would completely disagree with this ideal. Socialism is the economic system in which the workers, instead of a rich minority of entrepreneurs, own all industry. Workers receive the full fruits of their labors instead of being given miniscule compensation for backbreaking labor. Since the people are paid well for their work, work becomes a cooperative entity where people come to rely on one another and people actually are more inclined to do their fair share to help the advancement of society as a whole.

Socialism Violates personal freedom. It eliminates “injustice” by transferring rights and responsibilities from individuals and families of the state. It completely stops true

- socialism: a society having no private property, everything in the society is owned by someone or a business

Socialism is criticized for its lack of private property. A central power owns and distributes all goods, so individuals do not have any items to claim as their own. Therefore, individuals may lose or be deprived of certain goods simply if the state sees fit, and this total dependence creates criticism of a socialist rule.

As mentions before socialism is the doctrine that espouses public ownership or control of a major means of production. It aims to achieve an equitable and efficient distribution of social goods and greater economic planning then exist under capitalism. Although the central concerns of socialism appears to be economic its ramifications extend to the moral, social and political realms, in fact together with nationalism, it is the leading ideological and political movement of the 20th century.

       The right to life is the most important freedom an individual can have, and capitalism is the only system that is consistent with this right. "Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life" (Rand "Man's Rights" 288). This necessarily leads to the notion of the absolute right to private property, the bedrock upon which the moral and practical foundations of the capitalist system rest. By

Capitalism, the concept of private properties have the freedom of economic exchange through a competitive market where the government has little say in a free market, only being dictated by supply and demand. Now in capitalistic America this system of enterprise is quite the amazing conception of how civilians live their daily lively hoods in the United States. A market that gives and takes as well as a market overflowed with corporate greed. A system that overtaken a country turning it from a democratic government to a plutonic state of governing. A once prosperous land of freedom where the wellbeing of the Americans citizens lived a quiet and peaceful lives all taken away due to the egocentrism of the wealthiest Americans manipulate the rules to not only keep but also increase their wealth to their own likings without the regards of the lower classes. The egocentrism of a capitalistic America.

Officially, illicit migrants force costs on police, doctor's facilities, schools and different administrations. Putting them on a way to citizenship implies that inside of a couple of years, they will fit the bill for the full panoply of government projects: more than 80 implies tried welfare programs, and in addition Social Security, Medicare and Obamacare. The lifetime monetary expense for the normal unlawful worker after pardon would be around

Accordingly, one idea or fact that is often raised to differentiate socialism from communism is that socialism in general is the political movement that refers to an economic system in that they believe that the state should be in charge of all important producing industries thus taking hold of the control of free market in order to promote economic parity and egalitarianism. Theoretically, socialism seeks to distribute wealth equally among its citizens in a way that the rich don’t take

Pain and pleasure rule the way in which civilization runs for philosophers Aristotle, More, Machiavelli, Rousseau, Marx and Freud. All of these philosophers are comparable to Bentham and his philosophy of utilitarianism. Thomas More and Karl Marx both believe that private property deprives human beings from happiness, Aristotle and Rousseau contrast each other in regards to the sociability of human beings, and finally Machiavelli and Freud believe that in order to be civilized, one must be ruled and follow laws. Their philosophies are based on their interpretation of pleasure and pain, and the material conditions for society’s well-being. These six philosophers compare and contrast from Bentham’s principle of utility because that principle states that people choose to live by maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. According to Bentham, decisions need to be made which will bring more pleasure than pain. In this type of society, the “sum of total” happiness is rewarded, and any disruption is penalized. The three groups of philosophers differ in their connections with the state of the economy, happiness, and how happiness is carried out in the envisioned societies.

Introduction. In about eight and a half minutes, the benefits of communism will seem apparent to you. Every day you benefit from communistic and socialistic ideas and concepts. Giving proper education to Americans about this social system, and improving the knowledge of our own government, it is simple to see the merits of communism. Communism, like all governmental systems, has many advantages. It is not a surprise that it also has many drawbacks. The very best part of having a democratic government is that I can share my very own opinion with you..

Socialism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and derives its wealth through exploitation.