Communism Vs Utilitarianism

“From each according to ability, to each according to his contribution”, is socialism’s slogan. Socialism is a social and economic system characterized by common ownership, democratic control, and production for use only. Common ownership means that the resources of the world are owned by everyone thus, nobody can take control of resources beyond their personal belongings. The concept of democratic control means that everybody in a society has the right to participate in the social decisions that affect them. Production under socialism is directly and entirely for use. For example, everyone receives their share of production based on how much they have contributed. After a percent of their share is deducted to go to the common good, workers receive their share of production. Examples of common good is transportation and education, but common good is also used to help those who cannot directly play a part in production like elderly people or children. Socialism works under the assumption that everyone is willing to

However, believers in socialism would completely disagree with this ideal. Socialism is the economic system in which the workers, instead of a rich minority of entrepreneurs, own all industry. Workers receive the full fruits of their labors instead of being given miniscule compensation for backbreaking labor. Since the people are paid well for their work, work becomes a cooperative entity where people come to rely on one another and people actually are more inclined to do their fair share to help the advancement of society as a whole.

- socialism: a society having no private property, everything in the society is owned by someone or a business

As mentions before socialism is the doctrine that espouses public ownership or control of a major means of production. It aims to achieve an equitable and efficient distribution of social goods and greater economic planning then exist under capitalism. Although the central concerns of socialism appears to be economic its ramifications extend to the moral, social and political realms, in fact together with nationalism, it is the leading ideological and political movement of the 20th century.

Accordingly, one idea or fact that is often raised to differentiate socialism from communism is that socialism in general is the political movement that refers to an economic system in that they believe that the state should be in charge of all important producing industries thus taking hold of the control of free market in order to promote economic parity and egalitarianism. Theoretically, socialism seeks to distribute wealth equally among its citizens in a way that the rich don’t take

Socialism Violates personal freedom. It eliminates “injustice” by transferring rights and responsibilities from individuals and families of the state. It completely stops true

Coming from an Americans perspective it is difficult to comprehend that anything other than democracy, a mixed system, and the way the United States operates would be suitable. However, this is exactly why I very much enjoyed this task. While at first I was reluctant to believe that there are any pros of either system due to the constant negative stereotypes linked with each system, I am now able to broaden my horizon and see things from a different perspective. After conducting some research I was able to see that there are indeed some benefits to both communism and capitalism. While I managed to see these pros, the cons were still very prevalent and prove just why a mixed system works best in the world we live in today. When it comes down to comparing the two systems though, based upon the information that I gathered, I would say that I prefer capitalism highly to communism.

Officially, illicit migrants force costs on police, doctor's facilities, schools and different administrations. Putting them on a way to citizenship implies that inside of a couple of years, they will fit the bill for the full panoply of government projects: more than 80 implies tried welfare programs, and in addition Social Security, Medicare and Obamacare. The lifetime monetary expense for the normal unlawful worker after pardon would be around

Communism is a great idea. That’s what they said before Stalin swiftly executed 700,000 people with a gunshot to the back of the head, and before Mao Zedong’s policies and political purges indirectly killed at least ten million. It is a simple hypothesis; if everyone is equal, then everyone will be happy. Not a terrible concept, but the corruption of humans constricts the system until it inevitably crumbles. Some nations and individuals continue to believe in the fantasy, but the approach has no hope. In this way, Communism is equivalent to humanity. Humans choose to portray ourselves as selfless and benevolent, a species of unconditional love and kindness towards one another. We naturally fall short of these standards and sabotage our own system with warfare and selfishness. We beat each other into the ground in a simple game called life in which we are all meant to be playing on the same team. We are remarkably hopeful, while incredibly hopeless.

Do you think communism was better than capitalism? I personally think capitalism is better for two reasons. The first reason is that people have more opportunities under a capitalistic government than under a communistic government. The other reason is that in capitalism, the people live in a rich economic government and they have political freedom. While many people might disagree with me, I have proof in which capitalism is better.

     Throughout history, there have been many systems developed in order to have a better society. Two of the most analyzed, and debated systems that have tired to change an economy for the best are communism, and capitalism. Communism, and capitalism have been compared on many levels, such as why they will or will not work, and which one works better. Throughout this essay I will concentrate on the differences, and similarities of how each operates, along with the benefits, and problems that each of them produces.

Socialism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and derives its wealth through exploitation.

In comparison, capitalism and communism are like night and day--opposite of each other in every way, but the main differences in the two can be seen in the distribution of wealth among a society’s peoples and the appearance

Pain and pleasure rule the way in which civilization runs for philosophers Aristotle, More, Machiavelli, Rousseau, Marx and Freud. All of these philosophers are comparable to Bentham and his philosophy of utilitarianism. Thomas More and Karl Marx both believe that private property deprives human beings from happiness, Aristotle and Rousseau contrast each other in regards to the sociability of human beings, and finally Machiavelli and Freud believe that in order to be civilized, one must be ruled and follow laws. Their philosophies are based on their interpretation of pleasure and pain, and the material conditions for society’s well-being. These six philosophers compare and contrast from Bentham’s principle of utility because that principle states that people choose to live by maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. According to Bentham, decisions need to be made which will bring more pleasure than pain. In this type of society, the “sum of total” happiness is rewarded, and any disruption is penalized. The three groups of philosophers differ in their connections with the state of the economy, happiness, and how happiness is carried out in the envisioned societies.

Capitalism and communism are two polar views of economic structure. Since I have been influenced by capitalism, my worldview is different from an individual who lived in a communist country. I would think the mature ‘self’ would be viewed differently between capitalism and communism. In capitalism, there is personal material belonging and the aspiration towards the American Dream that anything is possible to achieve. In communism, material and economic wealth is spread among the people equally. The goal in communism is to meet the basic needs of all individuals and people may strive less for self-actualization. Also, the view of a full and satisfying life would be different. In capitalism, there is a balance of giving and taking. There is