Community Oriented Policing Vs Community Policing

Today, many police officers are out performing patrols on foot and on bike, interacting with the public through meet and greets, and participating in community service projects to help make the city a great place to live (Roufta, n.d.). Furthermore, this method of policing also allows the community to get involved with their local law enforcement. Through initiatives such as block watches, police officers can now answer calls from the neighborhood. Overall, today’s policing has created a method of policing known as Community Oriented Policing. Community Oriented Policing is a style of policing that involves police officers partnering with their communities to help solve problems and to attack the core problems that lead to crime in the first place (“Law Enforcement and Community Relations,” (n.d.), para. 24).

The effectiveness of community policing depends if community partnerships, problem solving and organizational transformations were actually put into action. The information that is presented in (Taylor 2010) depicts a very idealistic and functional system that should be followed by police officers and the people. Community policing has both its strengths and weaknesses but it can work if police officers are trained well in areas such as cultural and ethnics cues, it can reduce police brutality and lower crime rates. If there were a law that can be passed, then it would be much easier for everyone. The people should give a little trust, respect and collaborate with the police and so should the police to the people. Community policing would

Hopeful in this paper will give the strengths and weakness, when, why and who started SARA Model, Problem-Oriented Policing and Community- Oriented Policing. These are methods that will be use throughout the law enforcement filed. And know the key components and how to use them will beneficial to you as you progress in your file of chose with the law enforcement filed.

Although many may find community policing and problem-oriented policing to fall in the same category, there is (surprisingly) a difference between the two. For one, community policing has many definitions. For some, it means instituting foot and bicycle patrols and doing acts pertaining to the ideal bond between police officers and their community. While for others it means maintaining order and cleaning up neighborhoods in desperate need of repair (Dunham & Alpert, 2005). However, an idyllic definition of community policing is altering the traditional definition of crime control to community problem-solving and promising to transform the way police do their job. Within the past two decades, there has been much research on community

Well first and foremost we have the Political Era, this era which was from 1840s to the 1930s. Strengths of this era are common to what we strive for in community policing today, for example in this era the police sought out a very close relationship with the community. Because of the tith act, which required every male to enroll for police duty in a group of families within a community, the police had a lot of man power which was a tremendous benefit for the “wards” (Miller, L., Hess, K., & Orthmann, C. 2005). With the tithing system this established the principals of collective responsibility for maintaining local law and order within their community or “ward” (Miller & all). One of the most important strengths but also a weakness was that the police officers lived within the community in which they

Community policing is one method that police forces use to enhance public safety. According to the textbook Race and Crime, “It [community policing] was touted as having benefits over the traditional policing strategy because it is a proactive approach that

This type of policing is reactive where police officers patrol communities looking for crimes that have or are occurring. This style of policing allows for all suspects to be treated the same regardless of criminogenic factors. This type of policing leads to higher arrests and can be used as a deterrent due to high numbers of people talking about the police catching their crimes. This type of policing is effective when focusing on tackling a specific crime that is causing great numbers of harm to societies as seen with initiatives on gun violence, drinking and driving or drug trafficking. This type of policing limits corruption, which can be seen in policing approaches where close community interactions can lead to bias an unfair treatment. However, traditional policing is not without drawbacks. This type of policing leaves no room for discretion leading to us viruses them mentality from not only the general population but the officers as well. The police officers will no longer see themselves as apart of the community but above the community they are apart of. Reactive policing does not address issues of the community problems; it only creates a temporary superficial solution to greater problems. Community policing works with the public to police as well as prevent crimes, which is not seen in traditional policing. Although community policing seems idea, there should be a policing approach that handles most crimes without bias as well as works with the

This paper will cover two policing styles known as the “broken windows” theory and community policing. The paper will end with a small analysis of which style would be more practical long-term. This paper will start with an explanation as to what the “broken windows” theory is. Furthermore, this paper will cover some of advantages and disadvantages of that theory when put into practical application. Additionally, this essay will explain what “community policing” as defined by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). This is followed by a brief discussion some advantages and challenges that are unique to that approach. Lastly, this paper covers which one would be more viable policing in the long-term.

To comprehend how policing in America has evolved to how policing in America began, one must understand its antecedents. The element of modern policing in America is connected precisely to its English heritage. “Beliefs about police and citizens, crime prevention, the posse, constable, and sheriffs advanced from English law enforcement” (History of American Policing, nd.) The evolution of policing in America “inherited most of its governmental institutions from Great Britain. British policing can be traced back to Norman Conquest of England in 1066”

It is discussed as “resentment between those neighborhoods that receive the special attention of community policing and those that do not” (Patterson, 1995). Community policing isn’t efficient in many cities because it requires foot patrol, which was cycled out of policing in the past because of cost effectiveness. For example, a large city such as Portland, Oregon, would have to add 200 officers to its already large force of 750 to ensure they are doing community policing correctly, and “the shrinking tax base in cities and public demands for leaner government allow little room for the expansion need to make community policing effective.” (Patterson, 1995). Even as there are cultural and economic changes, law enforcement agencies continue to implement some parts of community

Community oriented policing or community policing, is a policing strategy that focuses on working closely with and building ties with members of the community. Community policing involves the use of partnerships between municipal agencies, businesses, individual citizens, non-profit groups and the media in order to develop methods to police the community. It requires police to take a proactive approach to address public safety concerns. Community policing covers a variety of philosophical and practical approaches and is still evolving rapidly. Community policing strategies vary depending on the needs and responses of the communities involved; however, certain basic principles and considerations are common to all community policing efforts. Today 's community policing has its origins in the 1960s. The 1960s saw its fair share of urban riots and gang activity. Police often responded to these criminal actions with brute force, and the

I believe that our community policing is more effective in the U.S. than those internationally for the reason that many other countries don’t have the resources in order to have officers get out in the community if it doesn’t involve an actual crime being committed. Many countries lack in funding to even have officers patrol their communities, and for that they have to send in other officers from neighboring areas (Hanwell, 2001). International policing has the same concept of ours, but conduct patrolling their way. Most of the time it is the old fashion way by looking for criminal activity, or waiting for a crime to be called in. They don’t necessarily have officers just out walking around or interacting with police officers. Plus, many citizens

To begin, it is necessary to explicate the concept of a policing model, in order to better contextualize this discussion of community-oriented and problem-solving models in particular. Policing models are used by researchers and police departments alike in order to describe the complex set of motivations, intentions, and strategies used to determine policing policy. Police models "are central entities of thoughts and ideas on policing," and for the most part

Broken Windows theory is important to community policing. Wilson and Kelling(1989) showed that crime and disorder are related, which shows if police are able to keep the community, environment in order it can prevent crime. Popularity of community policing was high in the late 20th century with 85% having some community policing involvement with police departments (Skogan 2004, which was even more popular with big cites. Community involvement is a key to community policing and at the end of the 20th century 70% of departments had meetings with citizens (BJS 2001).

Traditional policing models had very little input from the community they were supposed to serve; the shift of the officer tended to be quite repetitive in nature. Traditional policing was reporting to work, loading up in the patrol car, driving around for hours awaiting a call for service needed and then filing a report or arresting an alleged criminal. Typically just waiting for a call that a crime had possibly occurred is wholly reactive to crime control. That is a gritty summation of traditional policing which was the norm for police departments for many decades. Community policing is considered more proactive than traditional policing; and at its’ core, community policing should be an interactive collaboration of all