Community Policing At The Cops

Stared a s experiment in 1982 trying to resold some departments problems, this was look as good resource national level, with all the violent crimes increasing seem to appear a good idea. by 2010 53% of the national police departments have as mission of statement, what a big confusion in the media in how this may work and what they can do, they have question is a foot patrol is a community policing a new name community-policing? is a crime prevention? David Bayley in 1988 explained in different point to made clear stamens what is implementation of community policing and the confusion.

Community Policing took a different perspective on crime than August Vollmer. It shows that even though police officers are trained and respond to crimes on time, it doesn’t effect the crime rates. In the past foot-patrol was in place but it quickly failed due to poor management and not enough funds for the program (Bohm & Haley, 2014, Pg. 147). Community Policing was an idea to form a bond between the police and the citizens. If the police paid more attention to the minor problems in

Policing has changed since 9/11. They wanted different ways to detect terrorist actions and criminal acts. So community policing was implemented. The government has provided money and has been supportive in agencies efforts to participate in community policing. “For example, the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), a branch of the Department of Justice, provide funding to local police agencies to hire 100,000 new community policing officers in the 1990s” (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000 as cited in Chappell, 2009, 6).

Law Enforcement within the United States is limited as many people may feel that it is a dangerous job. With law enforcement being so limited there is one way the community can and has assisted throughout the years. Community policing is the system of allocating police officers to particular areas so that they become familiar with the local inhabitants. In other words community policing allows law enforcement to be at high profile areas while the community who chooses to be involved is the eyes and ears for law enforcement. In other words were there is crime the community will

Well first and foremost we have the Political Era, this era which was from 1840s to the 1930s. Strengths of this era are common to what we strive for in community policing today, for example in this era the police sought out a very close relationship with the community. Because of the tith act, which required every male to enroll for police duty in a group of families within a community, the police had a lot of man power which was a tremendous benefit for the “wards” (Miller, L., Hess, K., & Orthmann, C. 2005). With the tithing system this established the principals of collective responsibility for maintaining local law and order within their community or “ward” (Miller & all). One of the most important strengths but also a weakness was that the police officers lived within the community in which they

The Community Orientented Policing Services wrote about how the events after Ferguson affected the Community Policing aspect for officers on the job. Community Policing is a topic of discussion because people do not like the rules that officers have to follow in their jobs. The services believe that everyone is a leader not just police officers, but they have noticed that the Community thinks they are just followers who give information to the police. From the Wisconsin’s chiefs point of view he states “fully 80 percent of African-American respondents said “yes,” in contrast to 37 percent of White respondents. Three-quarters of African-American respondents said that they had “little or no confidence in the investigations” into the shooting;

Community policing is a philosophy. It uses organizational strategies that support the use of partnerships and problem solving techniques to address issues of public safety.Community-oriented policing is collaboration between the community, organizations within the community, and the police that identify and solve community problems. Police officers work with the community to help solve problems related to crime, fear of crime, social and physical disorder, and neighborhood conditions. They do this to enhance the safety and quality of neighborhoods. Officers spend time in these neighborhoods getting to know the residents and business owners by talking to them about the problems that the community is facing or individuals who are causing problems. They are responsible for reducing crime in their beats.

In the article “Community Policing” by the author Jeffrey Patterson he talks about the history of community policing. In the begging of the article he talks about how back in the 1800’s community policing was neither mandatory nor essential to the community. Patterson states, “ before 1829, the police--whether military or civilian--only responded after a crime had been reported”, essentially stating that the police acted after the event had happened. Later on in the article he goes on to talk about how that in this day in age community policing is limited by stating, “as with police-community relations and team policing, cities often attempt to implement community policing through small, specialized units in well-defined neighborhoods”,

In addition, officers must understand and be trained in the concept of community policing for the program to be a success. In a study of agencies that had implemented community policing programs, the National Institute of Justice found that most officers were poorly trained and did not understand the concept of community policing (Sadd & Grinc, 1996). In addition to the police officers within an agency, the local elected officials must also support the program. The agency and its administrator also need to educate the elected officials about community policing and what to expect from it. This will prevent unrealistic expectations from the program which will hinder the implementation and success of the program.

I would define community policing as a philosophy that provides tools for both law enforcement and the residents to work together for the greater good. I know that on paper the theory makes perfect sense. Officers go into the urban areas, mainly neighborhoods that struggle with socio-economic issues. However, the deployment of these officers needs to be specific and intentional. By this I mean that as Community Officer, I know that the position is not for everyone. When I was promoted to my current position my supervisors could not define my duties. All they told me was to go out and bridge the gap between community and the sheriff’s office. My first few weeks, I told myself, “One more day like today and I will ask to be transferred back to patrol.” The community was not very welcoming to my new face or my

Community policing can become an easier avenue for police corruption and brutality. Police Officers who are well known in the community can sometimes enact crimes (extortion)

What is community policing it is an attempt to get the community involved as an active partner helping the police to address crime problems. Community policing requires a trusting and willing relationship between officers and the community to accept and listen to the thoughts of each other. In my area within a certain radius, some cops live in my neighborhood. Different times a year there is a ho-down where there is dancing, food, and everyone gathers including the police. At the restaurant and convenient store by my house officers hang out there to do paperwork, also at the emergency room police agents hang out some of the time. In my area, there have been some missing kids, so the people of the community call up the local police that lives

Agencies hoping to implement community oriented policing programs are faced with several problems or caveats (Oliver. 2004) that must need to be addressed if the program is to succeed. The problems faced during implementation are definition, the role of the police, organizational structure, overcome and evaluation (Oliver.2004).

Traditional policing models had very little input from the community they were supposed to serve; the shift of the officer tended to be quite repetitive in nature. Traditional policing was reporting to work, loading up in the patrol car, driving around for hours awaiting a call for service needed and then filing a report or arresting an alleged criminal. Typically just waiting for a call that a crime had possibly occurred is wholly reactive to crime control. That is a gritty summation of traditional policing which was the norm for police departments for many decades. Community policing is considered more proactive than traditional policing; and at its’ core, community policing should be an interactive collaboration of all

The federal government has made remarkable contributions to the state of community policing strategies throughout the nation. There are several programs created to promote community-orientate policing. The Office of Community Oriented Police Services (COPS) is one of those programs. The COPS program works to increase the number of officers on the street, encourage partnerships between police and the community, promote