Community Policing Vs Community Based Policing

Today, many police officers are out performing patrols on foot and on bike, interacting with the public through meet and greets, and participating in community service projects to help make the city a great place to live (Roufta, n.d.). Furthermore, this method of policing also allows the community to get involved with their local law enforcement. Through initiatives such as block watches, police officers can now answer calls from the neighborhood. Overall, today’s policing has created a method of policing known as Community Oriented Policing. Community Oriented Policing is a style of policing that involves police officers partnering with their communities to help solve problems and to attack the core problems that lead to crime in the first place (“Law Enforcement and Community Relations,” (n.d.), para. 24).

In cities and towns across the country, tragic deaths of citizens in confrontations with police have have spiked a wave of distrust for law enforcement. The bad perception for law enforcement is unfair to the officer’s who are dedicated, and mean well in their duties, yet unfortunately, it has created tension between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. Due to the recent deaths and confrontations, reform proposals and new policies have been a national conversation to implement new initiatives to strengthen the bonds between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve. Although, confrontations between law enforcement and citizens in the community have spiked, the concept of community policing is not new. Throughout the years the philosophy of community policing has been to

Community style policing is often described as a “philosophy” in which law enforcement and their officers work to build personal relationships with members of the community, according to The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. The goal

The Community Policing era has been one of the contemporary police activities in the last 30 years. It is more of a decentralized approach to reducing crime by involving the same officer in the same community on a long term basis, so residents will develop trust and then provide information and assistance to the officer. Community Policing does not replace motorized patrol or other police tactics but instead compliments them with community partnership and problem solving (Bailey, 2011).

Law enforcement officials are in a position of authority and power that allows them a great amount of discretion. With this power there is a need for the individual to uphold the high ethical standards and accountability to the local community that the individual has sworn to serve and protect. When an officer does not follow the ethical standards that are placed upon him or her, the reputation of the department and profession is placed in jeopardy. Having on officer to breach the ethical standards presented with the position can have a negative impact on the communities’ opinion of all officers. It is important that individuals in upper management consistently maintain an environment that consist of integrity and maintain the trust of the

The fundamental idea following community policing is that the community should be willingly involved with law enforcement leaders to help resolve problems. While that may seem exceptionally simple, law enforcement leaders should acknowledge that the community should be involved in the activity from the start. The main

Community policing complements the traditional policing as an initiative to enhance community partnerships to reduce crime and the fear of crime. The philosophy of community policing is reliant on encouraging healthy relationships between officers and their community to get to the root of crime instead of treating the symptoms as founded in traditional policing methods. Traditional policing methods are based more on rapid response, patrol, and investigation procedures, but these processes are lacking in dealing with the underlying issues affecting communities (Ortmeier & Meese, 2010, p. 227).

Relationship between Law Enforcement agencies and communities should be based on reciprocity. What that means is that communities should be able to rely on police to serve and to protect them, while the police should be able to rely on communities’ support and cooperation. The positive equilibrium can be achieved only when a clear and fair dialogue exists between the two parties. Unfortunately, this relationship is not always this harmonious one and this is, in fact, the problem that we are currently experiencing.

From police officers to citizens many have asked when is enough, enough and what can be done to bridge the gap between both? Due to the events that have taken place over the years the only way to help stop the violence and bridge the gap is through “Efforts that improve relations between the public and the police in which have been found to be the most successful when the two have joined together in common causes. When the policemen who patrol, a neighborhood meet with its residents to discuss crime problems in the area and jointly develop solutions to them, as this allows a fundamental exchange of understanding” (Hans and Douglas, 2005). With recognizing the issues taken place, police departments nationwide have implemented community policing within their department that is based on the philosophy like the one stated in Management and Supervision in Law Enforcement which states, “Organizations strategies, which supports the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues, such as crime, social disorder and fear of crime.” (Hess, Orthmann, Ladue pg. 16). Community policing strengthens the idea that the police and people of the community should be partners, not opponents. Other ways police and communities can

Police departments use Community Policing approach because it enables police officers to engage in problem solving. In community policing, the police and the community work together to identify issues, address the underlying causes, to choose the right solutions to the issues, then evaluate its effectiveness (Ortmeier, 2006). Unlike traditional policing which is reactive and incident-driven, community policing focus on problem solving in addressing disorder. Throughout the years, community policing has evolved and created a new dimension called Intelligence Led Policing.

The United States can learn different techniques from other countries to better execute community-oriented policing, and also the do's and don't when it comes to community-oriented policing. Like from Sweden where crime prevention came first as a theory. Then the significant differences between the English and French styles of community policing but the fundamental principles that underpin police de proxmite are essentially the same as those of community policing. And like the Japanese koban (neighborhood police substations) are cited as the model of community policing and is credited with inspiring the development of storefront substations for which American police has adapted use in certain selection of the community. And unlike China, which

In the world we live in today it is difficult. We wonder to ourselves how things are happening and why we are having the outcry from society for reform. We should put no blame on one specific party, but policing can be difficult and interacting with an officer is just as stressful. Unfortunately, our youth have been dealing with the issues, and many have lost their lives do to actions that should have never been taken. Community policing is one of our best attributes to bring our society and world together as a well-oiled unit working in as synchronized as possible.

The police are usually charged with the great responsibility of ensuring that citizens are living quality lives that are free of crime and fear. In order to perform this duty effectively, the police need accurate and deeper knowledge of the citizens and issues they encounter in their daily lives. This knowledge will not be easy to come by if the police work independently from the citizens. Over the last several decades, police agencies have been working to gain the respect and the cooperation of the communities they serve. Community Oriented Policing was introduced to bring a closer working relationship between the citizens and the police.

What is community policing? Particularly, community policing is a strategy employed by numerous departments in order to establish and cultivate a relationship between the law enforcement agency and the community being patrolled. Moreover, community policing is composed of three analytical components; community partnerships, organizational transformation, and problem solving (Gardiner, 154, 2016). Notably, community partnerships are essential in community policing since they increase public trust and generate an enhanced relationship in law enforcement agencies better serving the community (Gardiner, 87, 2016). These community partnerships offer public input as well as encourage the public to cooperate with their local law enforcement agencies in order to minimize crime within their community (Gardiner, 88, 2016). Different from the traditional strategies of policing, community oriented policing has been adopted by two-thirds of agencies in order to enhance public safety and control crime. (Gardiner, 148, 2016).

Approaches of both community policing and traditional policing models differ in a variety of ways. The characteristics of the policing models are quite different from each other, and community based policing was considered laughable when suggested for the new approach in the early 1970s. Due to community policing’s new operating beliefs, new and unfamiliar expected officer behaviors, and that officers were being held legally responsible for their actions and inactions; the idea and implementation wasn’t widely accepted until 1980’s. Traditional policing was primarily dominated by rampant corruption and lawlessness that affected all levels of the police administration; therefore citizens had little trust if any, in the police officers of the time.