Company Overview Of Mattel, Inc.

Covergirl is an American cosmetics company. The company was founded by the Noxzema Chemical Company, and later bought by Procter & Gamble. The company is currently the best-selling cosmetic brand in America especially in the teenage marketplace (Debbie, 2006-2014). Being in the first position of the cosmetics market, the company has many competitors, and the biggest competition comes from the Maybelline cosmetics company, this is because both companies offer products with similar prices to similar consumer groups. The company Covergirl cosmetics is more of a brand licence rather a cosmetics company, because it does not provide any face to face customer service at any makeup counters, but they do provide a large variety of

But what they all have in common is that the target market is usually tweens, teens, and young adults. But realistically, older adults are seen shopping for themselves in such stores such as my company which makes the target market range vary even more. For example they would walk into the A.E. store at Queens Center Mall and observe not only tweens and teens buying the latest shirts and jeans, but also watch adults usually the parents of customers also buy the brand to show that they too can be young and "hip". They mean most teenagers like to purchase accessories such as belts and hand ties with the AE. eagle on it, but most adults would rather purchase the shirts and jeans because it is what they are mostly interested in. Even though few young adults do find the accessories interesting the target market for the accessories from tweens to adults. A.E concept is to simply sell the latest design in clothing usually season coordinated and earn revenue from kids all the way to

Sales in Asia could help combat Mattel’s plateauing market in the United States. The company seemed like it was in a strong position.

The problem surrounding Mattel Inc. is their mismanagement of international subcontractors and vendors and the production of certain toys (the manufacturing process), as well as their inability to adapt their marketing strategy or product to the constantly changing “demographic and socioeconomic trends.” This is supported by Mattel’s legal battle with Carter Bryant and MGA, their forced recall of certain toys that were manufactured overseas, and the increasing rate at which traditional toys are becoming less appealing to today’s young audience. Essentially, Mattel’s mismanagement and oversight lead to violations in terms of ethical and social responsibilities and safety standards.

Some adults may remember American Girl Dolls. They are the very expensive dolls that every little girl and nowadays, little boy craves. They have to have an American Girl Doll. It almost seems like these dolls are vital to their existence. I remember getting my first

Mattel is a global toy company that has been around since 1949. They are the company that introduced Barbie and Hot Wheels to the world as well as many others toys. Mattel has license agreements with Walt Disney and Nickelodeon. In

In 2004, Mattel Inc. first filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court claiming that its former employee, Carter Bryant, violated copyright infringement and breach of contract. Mattel is widely known for their popular Barbie dolls and MGA Entertainment have their Bratz dolls, which were the popular modernized Barbie in the 2000’s. In 2008, a federal jury ruled in favor of Mattel because they believed Mr. Bryant developed the concept of the Bratz doll while working at Mattel, then leaving and pitching his idea to MGA (“Barbie”). Mattel was awarded $100 million, however, the verdict was appealed resulting in a retrial.

Through studying the entire retail toy industry, we have been able to understand the complexity of the industry in which Toys "R" Us operates. Upon completion of the analysis, we realized that the industry is growing stably,

A. Ruth Handler, co-founder of Mattel, observed her daughter Barbara playing with paper dolls. This sparked Ruth's vision to create a 3-D doll for girls to play out their imagination.

To achieve this about 65 percent of its toy manufacturing was moved to Asia where its products could be produced cheaper. In doing so Mattel now has to work within the culture of its manufacturing facilities to ensure healthy and safe operations to its employees. This means that wage, possible child labor, and other ethical issues could arise, thus as stated before the Global Manufacturing Principles were created and implemented.

Mattel’s three largest customers are responsible for more than one third of the company’s revenue. With such a large portion of the company’s sales dependent on the these three customers any changes such as purchase reduction, favoring competitors or private label expansion, will have a significant impact on Mattel’s revenue. Also, with this limited customer base Mattel is hindered in with its ability to change prices.

Both Nasdaq director independence standards and Corporate Governance Guidelines of Mattel have strict requirements or rules to evaluate and determine whether these directors on the board are independent members in Mattel. In terms of the Nasdaq director independence rules, independent or outside directors are not allowed to participate in any material and pecuniary management activities and transactions as managers or employees. In addition, executive officers and employees who work in a listed company are not able to qualify independent directors, and members who have intimate relationships with other directors or executive officers also cannot be outside directors. However, the Corporate Governance Guidelines determine that members who take part in the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Executive Committee, the Finance Committee, and the Governance and Social Responsibility Committee are independent with material transactions and executive managements. As a result, there are ten directors on the board in Mattel, and only Christopher A. Sinclair, the CEO of Mattel, is not independent with the exercise of independent judgement and has no evidence to satisfy requirements of Nasdaq’s and Mattel’s director independence standards. In the other words, there are nine outside directors (90%) and one inside director (10%).

Others felt that they should consider Indonesia as a way to take advantage of low labor costs and very attractive exchange rates. Mattel currently operated a plant in Indonesia that produced Barbie® dolls. Montalto had to decide whether Mattel should go forward with the new China plant, build a plant in Malaysia or Indonesia, expand one of the existing facilities, or outsource the surplus die-cast volume through VOA. Company Background Based in California, Mattel, Inc designed, manufactured, and marketed a broad variety of toy products. The company’s core product lines included Barbie fashion dolls, Hot Wheels die- cast toy vehicles, Cabbage Patch Kids, Fisher-Price preschool toys, and Disney toys. Most of these toys were made overseas, primarily in southeast Asia. Mattel had wholly owned manufacturing facilities in China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Mexico, and Italy. Mattel was founded in 1944 by Elliot and Ruth Handler. Neither Elliot nor Ruth had much business experience or capital, but they both had dreams. The post World War II demographics of a huge baby boom plus a virtually toyless marketplace provided a unique opportunity to gain a place in a growing toy market. Mattel’s first products, simple picture frames and doll house furniture, met with mixed success. The first really big hit was a music box. By partnering with another toy inventor, they developed a music box that could be

In 2111, Prof. Sethi and colleagues disclosed that Mattel Inc. had played a part in, what many would consider, unacceptable business practices (p. 483). Although Mattel took actions to investigate the level to which practices were truly occurring, they had also promised to remediate all noted unacceptable practices. One of the unacceptable business practices that was uncovered was the mandating of certain employee groups required to live in company dormitories and were not permitted to utilize any other options for housing. Was this practice a form of discrimination? In order to decide if the business practice and any alternatives are fair and ethical for all, resulting in the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people, the scenario will be run through the EthicsOps.com’s Utility Test.

MATTEL TOYS RECALL CASE STUDY Product  recall:   On  August  14,  2007,  the  U.S.  Consumer  Product  Safety   Commission  (CPSC)  in  cooperation  with  Mattel  announced  five   different  recalls  of  Mattel's  toys.  On  September  4,  Mattel   announced  three  more  recalls.  Some  were  due  to  the  use  of  lead   paint,  while  others  were  due  to  small  magnets  coming  loose.             On  August  2,  2007,  Mattel's  Fisher-­‐Price  subsidiary  recalled   almost  one  million  Chinese-­‐made  toys,  including  the