Comparative Analysis of Austin & Searle's Speech Act Theories<Tab/>

Duress is a logical extension of principles of contract, particularly relating to consent and the intention to create a legal relationship. This is because a person cannot technically be said to be giving his actual consent to a transaction if he is forced to enter it; as such, the person cannot be said to have consented to the transaction. Furthermore, a person cannot be said to intend to create legal relations if he enters into a contract forcefully. As such, the courts have held felt that duress has a similar effect to fraud; as “whether it springs from a fear or from a belief, the party has been subjected to an improper motive for action.”

Speech is way of communicating to people it means speaking, verbal communication or to express thoughts, feelings and ideas. Children may learn through copying other children or adults which helps them to produce sounds which will then help to say words that other people can understand. In my setting I have non-verbal children so there speech is usually babbling or making a gesture through pointing.

In this analysis, one will be able to see the correct and incorrect actions that speakers may commit. More specifically, the speech, “Marcus Luttrell, speaker New York, 1 of 2 / Operation Red Wings - Lone Survivor” and “Marcus Luttrell, speaker New York, 2 of 2 / Operation Red Wings - Lone Survivor” will be analyzed to understand the difficulties and the triumphs that speakers commonly have. This paper will examine Marcus Luttrell’s speech mechanics, structure, development, and influence over the audience.

This is the basic rule that spouses should not be compellable to testify against their husbands, that the preservation of the matrimonial harmony of husband and wife is very important as two souls in one flesh. Marriage is a fundamental institution of the society and it’s the utmost respect, the institution of marriage has a greater importance to public interest rather than the outcome of judicial result . The New Zealand Commission noted that distress will be caused if a wife is compel to give evidence against her husband and this was supported by Lord Salmon were he comments that “it seems to me altogether inconsistent with the common law’s attitude towards marriage that it should compel a wife to give evidence against her husband and thereby destroy the marriage.” Allowing a wife to give evidence may incriminate her husband and furthermore it might put her in a state of risk in there matrimonial home, and it will also create a greater function of perjury in criminal proceedings. A wife is only compellable if the ‘offence is specified.’ PAEC s. 80 lays down further rules under the criminal charges related to specified offences as fellows.

Judges should consider the consequence of the danger and the probability that the threat may actually take place in regards to the speech itself. Other judges disagree with this view and complained that the test made the decision about when speech may be limited a matter of degree and that each case could result in a contradictory decision (Cornell, 2006).

Symbolic speech can be expressed in many different kinds of forms. The speech can be spoken, written, or be an action. All of these kinds of conduct could be said to express ideas in some ways, however, only some conduct is protected as symbolic speech. When the court analyzes these types of cases, they will ask the speaker about whether they intended on conveying a particular message and whether it was likely that the audience understood the message and the

Actions are derived from our instincts, thoughts and emotions in which we perform. They are seen by those that surround us and reveal part of our identity. Words are powerful, but can be confusing and be interpreted differently.

to the murder, he would do whatever it took to be released from the marriage. This may not be

* Review the formation and use of the perfect active, perfect passive, and present active participles 1.1;1.2

Cole Jackson period 7 The time of sunshine or summer soldiers is now coming to an end as the colonies enter a time of action needed un order to continue this fight for independence against the British. During the time period, British government had been taxing the colonies for breathing practically. Colonists just withstood an eight-month winter toil in which they were unable to strike or fight back. Thomas Paine, seeing the ripe opportunity for action, called on colonists to form and build a militia to prove a point to the British and how serious colonists are about freedom. However, many people feared the idea of a militia as they felt this was a too bold and harsh decision to go against the British army. Throughout Crisis No. 1, Paine connects

May it please the court? The founding fathers built this country upon not only the foundation of Freedom of Religion but, also upon the laws that government can not make laws establishing a religion as head of the country. Under this First Amendment protection all human kind can practice any religion of their choice without the invasion of government and/or community action just as all humans can also choose to not practice any religion at all. This is one so case; Mr. and Mrs. Roes attended their sons high school graduation on June 5, 2014 during which a speech was given by Ms. Abernathy the speech was said as follows “And so I invite you to pray with me. Father, son, and Holy Spirit… you are a wise God, oh lord, as evidenced even in the plan of redemption that is

Lyndon Johnson was convinced that liberal nationalism and the power of the federal government could transform society. His faith grew out of his youthful experiences with poverty in Texas, his political apprenticeship during the New Deal, and his desire to surpass Roosevelt's legacy. When he took office in November 1963, after John F. Kennedy's death, Johnson inherited the early initiatives to address poverty that the Kennedy administration had under consideration. With characteristic enthusiasm and expansiveness, Johnson declared a war on poverty in 1964 and pushed legislation through Congress to establish the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO).In this speech, the purpose Lyndon B. Johnson outlines his vision and goals for "The Great

Teachers creatively “dress up” as a component of grammar and “act out” its function. The website https://www.weareteachers.com/grammar-fun/ provides the following examples of costumes with actions that demonstrate grammatical

Florence Kelley campaigns for stricter child labor law in the U.S., in her speech at the National American Woman Suffrage Association (N.A.W.S.A) in 1905, by using emotional appeals, anaphoras, and metonymy to apprehend the N.A.W.S.A attention to the unethical working conditions of children in the U.S. focusing on the state of Georgia creating a heavy hearted tone.

And finally circumstance, this states that and actus reus can only be established for certain crimes under certain circumstances, for example rape can only take place if one party does not give consent.