Ethics Of Patriotism Essay

The essay is based from a time periods in the U.S where the culture was changing rapidly, governments fighting in the name of honor despite citizen’s outcry towards moral conduct. The essay represents this idea and advertises that peace is the ultimate

The statements by Sharon and Port Huron published in 1960 and 1962 respectively emphasize on the idea of defending the United States citizens. The two statements rely on the Declaration of Independence as the primary source of their arguments. The young authors present an opinion regarding the approach needed by the future government in addressing the future of the nation. However, despite the noted similarities, the two statements differ in regards to their conclusions as to how the U.S should continue protecting individual liberty. Although the two statements uphold the declaration, Sharon Statement supports the intentions of the founders about the U.S government with Port Huron Statement deviating from the original document by proposing further expansion of the federal government to ensure effective protection of individual freedom (Attack 282). The paper examines the two statements where the similarities and differences are captured.

patriotism in the highest regard is less willing to upset the order of his government. In an excerpt

There is a fine line between what American society looked like during World War II and contemporary America. The dilemma is that society has gone from patriotism and a fight for liberty to “everyone walking around with a chip on his or her shoulder” (Carr 2). This two distinct differences on America culture and society is manifested in, Howie Carr’s “Take $2000 and Call Me in the Morning” and Ronald Reagan’s speech, “The Boys of Point du Hoc”.

American beliefs and opinions give a great understanding of what an American values. The want and need for freedom is described in many different ways based on origin or social beliefs. The main backbone of America today is freedom. Through the building of an American empire everyone can’t come to an understanding of what it is to be equally free. By comparing and contrasting the perspectives of Patrick Henry’s speech to the “Virginia Convention,” to take up arms and fight for our freedom. Frederick Douglass’ “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July,” who feels it’s time to end slavery. It is clear that the struggles of the American story are still prevalent and America has not yet found a way for freedom for all.

When attempting to interpret the morality of an action in American society, it is nearly impossible to avoid reflecting on the Founding Fathers’ ideals and perspectives. Even

Throughout the course of history, Americans have changed the ways in which they derived the powers of the government from the consent of the governed, have changed their understanding of social and political practices concerning “rights”, changed “forms” of government, which have all led to a change in Americans’ “safety and happiness”.

The objective of this proposal is to explore the relationship between the National Football League’s (NFL) use of coercive patriotism and the militarization of the United States. For the purpose of this proposal, coercive patriotism will be defined as an attempt to exhibit social influence on an audience. For example: selling the notion of a strong military, presented to the public as being indispensable for a safe and secure America by way of military jet fly-overs. The NFL has grown increasingly patriotic during wartime or subsequent to national tragedies, such as 9/11. However, the league has remained exempt from major criticism concerning its use of coercive patriotism. Thus, the NFL playing a significant role

This was the party slogan for the political culture in George Orwell’s novel, 1984; a stark, depressing world where “Big Brother” is watching you at all times. The political culture of the Untied States, thankfully, is a much more democratic and freeing environment. “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...” is what we live by, not “Freedom is slavery.” The political culture of the United States is made up of two main concepts: liberty and equality. These will be discussed in this paper.

Thomas Paine, a revolutionary, intellectual, and supporter of American independence from England published a book titled, “Rights of Man” which deals with the government shielding the natural rights of its people. Initially, the book captures the diverse aspect of this nation, but it fails to reveal the struggles that arise to preserve and adapt to such a society. Paine expresses his optimism towards the supposed perfection of American society, as one “made up...of people from different nations,” with certain expectations. Additionally, the time gap between “Rights of Man” and modern America cannot be neglected. Paine wrote during an era in which “constructing a government on the principles of society and the rights of man” was the essential objective of the country. However, modern-day America experiences opposite ideals and Paine’s theory no longer remains true because of the educational gap between the rich and poor, terrorism, and racial profiling.

Maybe we could honor modern America’s internal hostile activities acting but at the same time maintaining a watchful eye toward state. Power becomes the goal of media control, publicity, and cruelty as the state shields its control of the political. In return, this inspires the state to pinpoint a native opponent- “every state provides, therefore, some kind of formula for the declaration of an internal enemy” (46). To answer why such phenomenon takes place, Schmitt responds that “if a part of the population declares that it no longer recognizes enemies, then, depending on the circumstance, it joins their side and aids them”

The three main conclusions of the article are Claude Fisher announces that “Americans stands in anti-government impulse, one is the embrace in the 19th century of laissez-faire ideas, and American strand is the communalism that emphasizes making, in Winthrop’s terms.” First, I will discuss about how Americans stands in anti-government impulse. For example, Americans has many freedom like without permission no government cannot come to search citizen home and citizen has a freedom choice to vote the party that they don’t agree with. This is a wonderful freedom that American’s citizen has. On the other hand, some people take advantage on this freedom, they planned to take many citizen life and no one will find out until innocent people got killed.

Many ideas are important within the American culture, but to the American sense of patriotism, freedom is most fundamental. The idea of freedom is central to the American politics – which is at times referred to as liberty. Since the birth of the nation, freedom has been the vocabulary of the American language and its importance cannot be underestimated. The Declaration of Independence, for instance, ranks liberty as an inalienable right. On the other hand, the Constitution reckons that it purposes to protect civilians’ liberty. The importance of freedom has even stretched further than the political arena and has prompted the birth of civil rights movements and other activist protests. The Cold War and the Civil War were all for the cause of freedom. The importance that Americans attach to freedom can also be demonstrated from the erection of statues, banishment of slavery, use of liberty poles and a right to vote for adults. For many years, women and the African Americans have for a long time fought against denial and infringement of their freedom . However, given the importance that Americans affiliate to freedom in the conceptualization of their country, it has been the subject of modifications over the course of years especially before the Revolutionary War.

A peaceful and patriotic citizenry is achieved where rights and freedoms of all citizens are upheld, and where the citizens are responsible enough to obey the existing legitimate laws and powers of the land. Obedience to legitimate laws and powers are best achieved not through force, but largely through patriotism on the part of the citizens. Jean-Jacques is an advocate for a just, peaceful society. On the other hand, Machiavellian society appreciates and justifies use of force for personal gains.

Through the use of quantitative analysis, this paper analyses to what extent individuals’ identification with the constitution of the nation-state, referred to as constitutional patriotism, can provide a basis for a common European ‘demos’. The theoretical framework draws upon the German philosopher Jürgen Habermas and his concept of moral reason, communicative rationality, and deliberative democracy.