Comparative Essay On Tattoos By Jon Kelly And Hennessey

Tattoos have been around for quite some time now, and they have always been a symbol of belonging, cultural expression or for religion. These days, individuals choose to tattoo themselves because it is part of their lifestyle or personal image. While continuing to grow in popularity and becoming a lifestyle, people are facing issues with having visible tattoos in the workforce. Although it is a form of free expression, employers have a right to enforce certain rules about tattoos in their company because they have a public image to uphold. How you present yourself to the public is solely important, which is why tattoos should not be allowed to be seen in the workplace, since it may appear offensive or unconservative.

To begin with Leeanne Padowski talks about how tattooos can affect us in our works." A 2011 study by CareerBuilder shows that 31 percent of survey employers ranked having visible tattoo as the top personal attribute that would stop them from promoting an employee" having visible tattoos can stop employers to promote to a

The art of tattoos has been prevalent in several ancient cultures and represented various meanings. Until around the mid-20th century, tattoos were seen in a very negative light; mainly associated with circus freak shows, bikers or outlaws. In more current times, tattoos are becoming more accepted overall. With this change there is a debate of body art in the workplace. If a person chooses to have visible tattoos, it should no longer be seen in such a negative view among assorted careers today. Tattoos are continuously becoming more popular with each generation and often have some personal meaning. Some companies that have recently started to accept appropriate body art in the workplace are seeing positive benefits related to their new policy changes. This debate has also led people to file discrimination lawsuits against their employer. There are occasions, however, that the subject matter or the placement of a tattoo on the body may not be professional for certain types of jobs. The discussion of visible tattoos needs to be evaluated by each company, and often each individual situation, to determine if body art can be accepted at that business.

People feel that there is no way that you can have job if you have tattoos. Some people will take people with tattoos less seriously if they have tattoos seeing them as childish or naïve. To back up these accusations, here is a quote: “No matter how much meaning they have for the owner, they are just not attractive nor professional looking. It does affect my decision-making process when hiring.” Emily Olson, who was a bus girl at a restaurant in Wisconsin, was great at her job. Her employer promised to give her a promotion when she turned eighteen, which would take her from a busser to a waitress where she could earn more money. On her eighteenth

Thesis Statement: The number of people with tattoos is continually growing, but employers are still reluctant to hire those with visible tattoos.

People argue that tattoos should never be shown in a professional setting. Most places of employment even have a dress code that requires you to cover them while working. Employers, in some settings, say that tattoos would or could be offensive or obscene. It was hard to find any article that was against tattoos in the workplace. After a while of searching the internet and databases, I found an article titled “Tattoos in the Workplace: The Research Forbes Was Too Lazy To Do” by Annie Singer. Written on February 26, 2016 and updated February 26, 2017, Singer’s research found that “consumers showed a preference for non-tattooed front-line staff.” She also found that “visible tattoos had a predominantly negative effect on employment selection, driven by the hiring manager’s

This leaves possible employers in a situation requiring them to decide whether or not to allow tattoos. More and more employers are seeing past the typical views on tattoos and allowing their employees to

Whether you acknowledge it or not, there is a negative stigma towards tattoos in a workplace. Tattoos and any other type of body art should be allowed a workplace simply because your appearance does not determine your eligibility and or intelligence, a person is in charge of their body and should not have to limit their choice of self expression, and even though is completely legal to not hire someone because of visible tattoos, that is still a form of discrimination and should be treated as such.

The topic for this media campaign is workplace stigma and discrimination against people with tattoos and/or body modifications.

The debate over tattoos in the workplace is growing in the United States as well as the United Kingdom. With the popularity of tattoos on the rise, many companies around the world are starting to put more constraints on body art; while others are becoming more open to the idea of exposed ink. The articles; “Tattoos, No Longer A Kiss Of Death In The Workplace” by, Rachel Hennessey a Forbes contributor, and; “Should anti-tattoo discrimination be illegal?” by Jon Kelly of BBC both thoroughly discuss tattoos and their impact on professionalism. The articles have many differences on how companies view tattooed employees however, there is a distinct similarity in tone throughout both articles when it comes to the acceptance of tattoos in the workplace.

Admittedly, Many employers worry tattoos and piercings will affect their businesses, but it will not have the effect they think it will. For example, customers are not going to walk out of a eating establishment because their server has piercings or tattoos. As long as body modifications does not pose a health and safety risk on the job, they should not factor into an employer’s decision to hire. Having ink embed in skin in a design of someone’s choosing does not alter their ability to be productive, charismatic, or respectful in the work

Foltz, (2014) examined 100 undergraduate students called “the millennial” from diverse majors to understand their opinion regarding tattoos and career. However, this research is also used as a guide to help students comprehend the negative effect of their visible tattoos in their employments, also help faculties better get students ready for employment after graduation and finally help employers have an open minded about tattoos. She points out that 86% of those students believe that having tattoos can result in difficulties with employment. Foltz reports that students are conscious of the negative impact of tattoos on their career, but they still plan to have them. Although they consider getting tattoos anyway, the place of the tattoo is put

Over the last 15 years the popularity of tattoos has doubled, there are multiple shops in every town, but tattoos are still not widely accepted at many places of work. Why do many workplaces still require tattoos to be covered? Do they want them covered because they are worried people will be offended? Is the growing demand and increase in tattoo business a sign that businesses’ need to rethink

What do you think when you see someone full of tattoos? I would like to show you that the stereotypes are wrong. Some of society assumes people with tattoos are dangerous, unprofessional, and uneducated. A lot of famous, educated, and professional people support the art of tattooing and freely show their own. In this essay, I’m hoping to open up your mind to the idea of tattoos in workplaces.

The argumentative essay entitled “Tattoos in the Work Place” provides an interesting perspective on what the author believes would support an amendment or inclusion of language to the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 (“Act”) related to discrimination of individuals with visible tattoos. The author provides information regarding some of the common misconceptions of the character of individuals with tattoos. Also provided in the essay are the author’s version of historical information relative to tattoos together with references to litigation involving discrimination. The argument presented takes the position of specifically addressing employment discrimination towards individuals with visible tattoos.