Hunter Homan 3 Mughals and the Ottomans The Ottomans (1299-1923) and the Mughal (1526-1857) empires were alike in various different ways due to the fact that the two were in close proximity to each other and most states are alike,but they are also different due to the geography of their state. The states were comparatively the same due to the close proximity of the two empire which would led to their ruling strategies, tolerance, monumental architecture and beliefs to be culturally diffused. The empires managed to rule a large area through the same strategy. This strategy consisted of conquering a new land, and then throwing the current head off of the seat of power and installing another head of state, which was usually supportive of the emperor or sultan and Muslim. This strategy proved to be useful because the people of the state would be loyal to the head, which in turn would be loyal to the ruler. Another way that the two empires were the same was the fact that they were religiously tolerant, to an extant. For example the Ottomans were tolerant to Jews and Christians, though there was a non-muslim tax, and the Mughal were extremely tolerant even creating a syncretic faith called Din-I-Ilahi, which was a combination of the Islamic and Hindu faiths, until Aurangzeb became emperor and creating a strictly Muslim India, which he tried to achieve by attempting to destroy Hinduism and persecuting Hindus, Sufi, Sikh, Jews and …show more content…
The final way the two states were alike was the creation of monumental architecture based on the Islamic faith. After turning the Hagia Sophia into a mosque, which was created to be a Catholic chapel by the Byzantines, the Ottomans
The Ottoman and Safavid empires were two of the three Muslim empires that were present from 1450 to 1750. They are also often referred to as the gunpowder empires due to their innovations with heavy artillery. They used cannons and muskets in war. The Ottoman empire controlled most of the upper southwestern part of Europe and Asia. While the Safavid controlled the middle and part of southern Asia.
The decline of the Mongol Empire laid ground for the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. These three empires all had military strength, Sovereign Pride, Religious commitment, and Aesthetic sophistication in common to varying degrees. The Safavid and Ottoman empires are usually compared because of the wars that broke out between them and their similar attributes. However, this will be a comparison of the Safavid and Mughal Empires.
The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughals were all gunpowder empires. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the differences between all of these empires mentioned. Each fall into five different categories.
The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughals were all explosive realms. The reason for this paper is to thoroughly analyze the contrasts between these domains.
The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal societies all relied on bureaucracies that drew inspiration from the steppe traditions of Turkish and Mogol people and from the heritage of Islam, they adopted similar policies, they looked for ways to keep peace in their societies which were made up of different religious and ethnic backgrounds, and they were associated with literary and artistic talents. Military and religious factors gave rise to all three of these empires.
The Mughal and Qing Empires’ methods of consolidating political authority are similar in that both took over a previously existing nation, kept a little bit of the previous culture in the empire, and increased power by gaining more territory. They differed in that the Mughals partly relied on Europe while the Qing viewed the Europeans as barbarians, and the Mughals emphasized religious tolerance while the Qing eventually forced Roman Catholics to worship in private. These empires existed around 1450-1750 AD, which is around the time that Europe was rising in power and Asian nations were slightly lagging behind, which may or may not have concerned these empires. This was also around the time that gunpowder was heavily influencing empires and
Throughout time empires have risen and fallen and taken various approaches in doing so. Some of these society were warlike, while others focused on intellectual discovery. Among these various societies were great empires like the Ottoman, the Mughal, the Spanish, and the Ming. All four of these great empire ruled at overlapping times but all eventually fell for different reasons. All had strengths and weakness and can be used as a learning opportunity for an empire that came after them. From the Ming and the Ottoman you can learn strength such as religious tolerance and government structure. On the other hand, the Mughal and the Spanish teach us the dangers of over taxing and over centralizing government. In order for an empire to successfully function they must have an accepting culture, a balanced economy, and manageable size.
The Mughal, Qing and Ottoman dynasties all had taken rule over multi-ethnic agrarian Eurasian empires in the duration of the 17th and 18th century. All empires respectively faced enormous political, economic and social transformations which challenged and set hindrance to their rule in the 19th century. The Ottoman and Qing and Mughal empires had been 3 of probably the greatest empires to have ruled in history. Nevertheless, they'd many similarities in addition to differences. The empires went through difficult periods of time, but at some point, they additionally went through times of prosperity and growth. Though the Ottoman and Mughal Empire both didn't force conversions into Islam, the Ottoman's development relied on the bad military force of theirs, even though the
Because of the Ottoman and Mughal Empire being tolerant of other beliefs, people of all religions living in the empire lived in peace. The Ottomans granted freedom of worship to
During the postclassical era many great empires arose. Two of the most powerful and influential groups of the time were the Byzantine Empire and the Abbasid Caliphate. Both the Abbasids and the Byzantines were places where important cultural hubs existed and where trade flourished throughout the whole empire. Even though culture was present in each area, the cultures were not the same and there were separate religious beliefs and practices; for example the Byzantine Empire was mainly Orthodox Christian while the Abbasid Caliphate was Sunni Muslim. Use of religion throughout the empire, methods of rule, and eventual ways of declining all caused the Byzantines and Abbasids to have a distinctive and lasting
The Ming and Ottoman Empires arose after the Mongols in the mid-14th century. These two empires undertook massive renovation. Although there were some broad, common goals in their re-building, the Ming focused inward, while the Ottoman focused outward in building their empires, which reflected in their trading techniques. The Ming dynasty focused on internal trade and restricted external trade; the Ottomans however, mainly focused on external trade rather than internal. Trading across the ocean led to the Ottoman Empire becoming tolerant of ethnic religious minorities due to their large landmass, whereas the Ming dynasty’s geography caused them to become isolated, therefore leading them to become selective of their treatment towards ethnic
Both the Caliphates and the Aztec Empire show a similarity in how each used their cultures to achieve cohesion among their respective empires. In the Caliphates, Islamic culture helped unite the population while Aztec ritualistic culture unified the ethnically diverse peoples of the Aztec Empire. Islamic culture unified much of the region under Umayyad and Abbasid rule. As Islamic merchants and missionaries spread Islam to the people, forms of Islamic culture spread with them. Islamic art, sciences, maths, medicine, architecture, Islamic
The difference of religion had a huge impact on both of the empires. Christianity in the Byzantine Empire was the most popular religion in the world with Islam right after. Judaism is a monotheistic religion and while most Christians believe they are monotheistic as well, many Muslims think upon Christians as polytheistic because they believed both God and Jesus are gods. In comparison, both empires were ruled by a pope. The Byzantine Empire was impacted through Christianity because the pope was the head of the empire, such as Constantine who became pope in 708. The Islamic Caliphate was also impacted through Islam because they too were ruled by a pope. This meant if you had a religious ruler, many people of the empire would follow suit and either convert or become more involved in the religious practices that the emperor/pope would do. Both religions were quite simple. Islam has no official clergy, and follows only one single sacred text, the Koran. However, Muslims do believe in the validity of the Old Testament. Muslim's
One big of the differences was their view on religion. The Mongols did not have one religion that they all followed. Instead they had multiple religions and even created one themselves, known as Shamanism. The Ottoman Empire on the other hand made Islam as their main religion. The Ottoman Empire did allow people to worship other
New powers such as the Sikhs, Jats and Marathas came onto the scene. Gradually they broke off from the Mughal domination and established their own independent states.