What I think about Hatchet and “A Cry In The Wild”is that Hatchet is more detailed than “A Cry In The Wild.”well here are my reasons. First of all Hatchet has a lot imagery, for example,in Hatchet when Brian throws the hatchet and makes sparks which lead to making a fire. And some foreshadowing,and that is why I think the book is better. Now the reason I think the movie “A Cry In The Wild”is not so good,unlike the book,the reason is because,it does not show a lot of details and not that many foreshadowing. Also in the movie
The protagonist of Hatchet by Gary Paulsen is Brian Robeson, a thirteen-year-old boy from New York. The setting of this book is the northern Canadian wilderness. At the beginning of the book, Brian is going on a plane from New York to Canada to visit his father after he and Brian’s mother got divorced. The divorce and “The Secret” that Brian’s mother is having an affair plagues Brian for the majority of the book. As the pilot of the plane is flying them over the Canadian wilderness, the pilot has a heart attack and the plane crashes into a large lake. Brian survives, but the plane has sunk in the lake. Brian is injured and has no food. He eventually finds a bunch of strange berries and eats them, but they end up making him sick. He then finds a large amount of raspberries and spots a bear while he is there. He makes a shelter, but in the middle of the night, a porcupine wanders into his shelter and Brian throws his hatchet at it. It shoots quills into his leg and runs off.
(page 52) Also in page 53 it
Have you ever read a book then went to go see the movie. Then felt one was much better than the other.The book where the red fern grows is somewhat similar to the movie. Then also very different from each other. If you ever compared the book where the red fern grows to the movie. You can tell that they have left out a lot of details in the movie. Then they make it a lot less emotional.
Many people may agree that the movie was better, but personally, i think the book was better. The book let your imagination go wild, but the movie just held your imagination back by showing you the scene on a screen. Unlike the movie, the book gave a more vivid description of “The Tell Tale Heart” by telling you every single detail. That is why I think the book was more enjoyable to read instead, of watching the movie.
When making a distinction between movie and novel, it is not acceptable, in my opinion to talk about the differences between the two versions in terms of "better" or "worse." You may like how the artist creates a scene in the movie or how another artist plays with the same scene in the novel, but these are subjective preferences; neither speak to the quality of the work. You cannot critically compare different media, because you do not have a common set of terms with which to comparatively discuss the works.
Have you ever heard about the novels Hatchet and Wonder.They are great novels.Read to find more about them.So lot of people think Hatchet and Wonder movies are better than the books.I figured out the book has more information and in the movie it is either fake or does not tell all the facts from the book.Hatchet and Wonder have a lot of similarities,however they are very different too.
The Big Chief from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey, and Milton from Office Space are similar in that they were both relatively quiet in the beginning of their respective stories, but eventually rebelled against the combine. Both characters started off as very quiet people, and became fed up with the unfair rules of the combine. These characters drastically changed their personalities from the beginning of the story and did things nobody would expect them to do as an act of rebellion against the combine.
- This book is a really good book not a very good movie because they have so many differences if they would have not started in the middle of the book then it would have been really good and entertaining but it just doesn't give me the vision in my head of the whole book . A movie to me is where a book comes to life and, but it still was a good movie but could have been
Have you ever had a nightmare where you were stuck on an Island by yourself? Well this really happen to Brian in the story Hatchet by Gary Paulsen. He was stuck on the island for 54 days. This caused moments were he had to put his thinking to the test. He had aha moments of realization on figuring out problems he may have had in the story. When he had these moments it would impact the way the story on ways to survive. These moments helped him out on how to make a fire with his resources he has, and also helps him have a more proficient way on catching fish.
The 3 major differences that were seen are the shattering of the conch, the pilot’s presence, and Ralph’s attitude towards Piggy. Due to these major differences the novel left a greater impact on its readers than the movie on its viewers. Seeing the movie and as well reading the book, personally the book was a better. The book has a very different approach of that showed these 3 major differences to their full extent. Out of the two though, I would choose the book as more pleasant and
Many people always say look at the positive side when dealing with problems. Comparing these two novels brings out the same points but many differences could be pointed out. Contrasting and comparing these two give different perspectives and makes you think more in depth about them. The Most Dangerous Game and High Noon drive home the same point but these scenarios brings more value out of the story.
This book, called is about a survival story of young boy, Brian. Before I read this, just looking title on its cover, I've thought it may be about a murder case because hatchet is a kind of an ax. So I was a bit frightened and start this book with anxiety. However, the book was about a young boy whose name is Brian Robeson and he had left alone in Canadian wilderness owing to an accident.
For example, the movie left out how the Logan children dug up holes to stop the bus from splashing them. Finally, I believe that the novel Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry is better than the movie. The reason the novel is better than the movie is because the novel goes into more details
Both share the same plot, and there are very little differences between the two. These are a few of the differences that I was able to notice between the book and the movie. There are several others throughout the story, but they are all just as minute and in the end they have no effect on the outcome of the story. Overall, I was very impressed with the movie and it was very true to the book. I have seen my share of movies that were adaptations from books that did not do the book justice, but this one is almost exactly like the book, so it was very
At times of strife with oneself and during periods in one’s life, people tend to find answers or peace by disassociating from their immediate surroundings and replacing it with the natural world. Although Wild by Cheryl Strayed and Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer share the same word in their titles, the two are completely different stories with separate narrative purposes. Wild is about the author’s journey of self-discovery and self-acceptance through hiking the Pacific Crest Trail, and Into the Wild is the author’s discovery of Chris Mccandless’s natural journey, which ultimately led him to his death. Even though the ending of Wild leads to Strayed’s renewal of life, and the ending of Into the Wild leads to the insight on the ending of