Persian Wars Vs Pax Romana

In early fifth century BC Greece, the Greeks consistently suffered from the threat of being conquered by the Persian Empire. Between the years 500-479 BC, the Greeks and the Persians fought two wars. Although the Persian power vastly surpassed the Greeks, the Greeks unexpectedly triumphed. In this Goliath versus David scenario, the Greeks as the underdog, defeated the Persians due to their heroic action, divine support, and Greek unity. The threat of the Persian Empire's expansion into Greece and the imminent possibility that they would lose their freedom and become subservient to the Persians, so horrified the Greeks that they united together and risked their lives in order to preserve the one thing they all shared in common, their

Herodotus’s The Histories uses the culture of different peoples as a category of historical explanation in order to explain the entire story behind the conflict between the Greeks and the Persians, though his conception and account of culture has been a topic of debate for many decades. Herodotus’ method when exploring the culture of other peoples is to compare them to the known culture, his own culture, of Greece. Through the comparison of ‘the other’ to Greece, Herodotus not only explains the culture and traditions of other countries or people, but he also affirms Greek identity by constantly comparing or relating to Greek customs in order to show the likeness or stark differences of cultures. Many scholars have, however, criticized Herodotus for doing this; naming him an ethnocentric for introducing all other peoples and cultures as inferior to his own. This essay will seek to expose whether Herodotus is an ethnocentric or a cultural relativist by exploring the ways in which Herodotus refers to ‘the other’ and the customs and culture of these people. Through the exploration of the Egyptians and the Scythians in Herodotus’s The Histories, this essay will determine that Herodotus’s conception of culture develops from a cultural relativist perspective rather than an ethnocentric point of view, where he uses his own well-known culture as a basis for explaining other cultures and customs, while respecting their difference as being of equal value in their own land, as Greek

The Role of Themistocles in the Greek Defeat of the Persians in 480 - 479 BC.

The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each

The political failure of the Greek led the country to a great war. According to Herodotus, who dedicate his life writing real ancient stories in the fifth century BC shows that the catalyst was a political conflict in Miletus started Persian war. Athens, Sparta and other polies

Themistocles was responsible for the Greek victory in the Persian wars to a considerable extent. The key to Athens' strength in the 5th Century BC was in this general and statesman and therefore, as Greek victory relied so heavily on Athens, Themistocles vitally contributed to the outcome of the Persian king’s invasion of 480-479 BC. His early life reflects the character and skills developed that were responsible for these contributions. Five pivotal roles he undertook were of varying degrees responsible for Greece’s success against Xerxes. Themistocles possessed an incredible foresight

The persian wars all started because of the greeks and athenians burning of the city sardis.They burned down sardis because of persia conquered Ionian. That lead to the first persian battle the battle of marathon.

The Greeks and Persia had a lot of conflict, argot ‘The Persian War’ but could it have been inevitable? Greece and Persia, though, both in the same time period they had quite a few differences. They both had the same goals to expand and conquer any civilizations that they felt threatened by. These two large and expanding empires, could they have ever joined together? No, they were so different one had slaves, one did not, one had religious freedom, one did not and so on. The Persian war, all started when Persia attacked a Greek civilization entitled ‘Sparta’! Sparta held off the Persians for as long as they could the war contined and Greece won. This battle is so big in our history it couldn’t have been avoided both civilizations wanted power

Have you ever wondered if one event could change history? How big would the change be? The fall of Persia, was a turning point in history after the Greco-Persian Wars. After the death of Darius, his son Xerxes ruled until 465 B.C. Xerxes was a cruel but weak king who was also defeated by the Greeks in the Persian Wars. During Xerxes' reign, the Persian Empire declined.

The Greeks won against the Persians because of heroic actions performed by Athens and Sparta and occasional help from Apollo. The History.com Staff stated, “Athens and Sparta, both powerful Greek city-states, had fought as allies in the Greco-Persian Wars between 499 and 449 B.C. In the wake of the Persian retreat, however, Athens grew more powerful and tensions rose, escalating into nearly three decades of war. Sparta emerged victorious, while the constant fighting left Athens bankrupt, exhausted and demoralized. Neither city-state regained the military strength they once had” (“Peloponnesian War”).

The Persian Wars refers to the warfare between Greece and Persia within the 5th century BCE which worried invasions by using the latter in 490 and 480 BCE. Several of the maximum famous and substantial battles in records were fought for the duration of the Wars, those had been at Marathon, Thermopylae, Salamis, and Plataea, all of which would become legendary. The Greeks have been, ultimately, successful and their civilization preserved. If they have been defeated then the western international might not have inherited from them such lasting cultural contributions as democracy, classical structure and sculpture, theatre, and the Olympic Games.

Persia was fast becoming an expanding empire. Under the rule of King Darius, Persia conquered Lydia, which is where the Ionian Greek city-states were. After some time, the Ionians revolted and fearing the retaliation, they asked the mainland Greeks for aid. Only the Athenians and the Etretrians responded, but even with it, Ionia once again fell to the Persians and were left under their rule (Butler). Although Darius didn’t retaliate immediately, he knew the Athenians would need to someday pay for their treacherous act of defiance. Darius sent an envoy to the Greeks to diplomatically offer them a way to submit, but the Greeks “sent a no-nonsense reply” and formed an alliance in defense of the Greeks against the Persians (Cartwright). The

The next morning (possibly September 28, but the exact date is unknown), the Persians were exhausted from searching for the Greeks all night, but they sailed in to the straits anyway to attack the Greek fleet. The Corinthian ships under Adeimantus immediately retreated, drawing the Persians further into the straits after them; although the Athenians later felt this was due to cowardice, the Corinthians had most likely been instructed to feign a retreat by Themistocles. Nevertheless none of the other Greek ships dared to attack, until one Greek trireme quickly rammed the lead Persian ship. At this, the rest of the Greeks joined the attack.

The division and unification of Greek city-states could have come from many different things, however war seems to be the common attribute. War is able to divide and unify societies, cultures, and religions throughout the world.

To me the most influential battle during the Greco-Persian Wars would be the battle of marathon. The battle of Marathon was very infamous it took place 490 B.C.During the first invasion. Not only was this battle the first attempt but it was the first defeat. I believe this battle also was very important because there was freedom. Also western civilization was laid out. The Greeks aim in the battle of was to break the Persian advancements on Greek soils. The Greeks had advantage of this battle. The Greeks defeated the Persians through great arms and tactics. They had strategized the tactics so well that they were confident and knew they had it under their belt. As well as fighting as allies made me want to go more into research which I thought