preview

Compare And Contrast Jurassic Park Book Vs Movie

Decent Essays

There are many times in entertainment history that the movie is better than the book. Books are well detailed, spread out, and are successful if the author is good. But movies are inspired and adapted to bring a much more compelling story. In movies, actors and directors constantly are inspired to expand upon the story, yet also bring emotions that the books don't always capture. Therefore, if done correctly, the movie should be creatively adapted from the original book

Firstly, movies can be adapted creatively to fix some of the original's weaknesses. Jurassic Park is an example of this. In the film, the characters are more developed – making us (the audience) feel more sympathetic for them. In books, words are presented to read, but in movies, real human beings bring the story to life in their interpreted way. In a sense, the final, final script of Jurassic Park was the movie. For another example for how Jurassic Park was better in its movie form – the grandfather who created the park isn't killed in the movie. In the book, the author makes John Hammond (the grandfather) seem forgetful and thoughtless; while in the movie, the grandfather who created the park for his grandchildren, can live to redeem himself for another day. So, in movies that had creatively been adapted, it changes and enhances the story's themes and helps bring the story up positively – where the book fell short. …show more content…

In the Secret Life of Walter Mitty, the movie is creatively adapted from the book. While in the book, Walter has random daydreams and a nagging wife, the movie decides to flip that. In the movie, Walter's daydreams become reality, he grows confident, and throughout the movie – he searches for his wife. The movie successfully took the original idea and gave it

Get Access