preview

Compare And Contrast Macbeth Act 4 Scene 1

Decent Essays
Open Document

After viewing two different performances of Act 4 Scene 1 of Macbeth, I have come to the conclusion that one is better than the other. The performances take on different forms of the original text. Roman Polanski’s version is in the form of a movie, while the Folger version is in the form of a play. These contrasting mediums portray Shakespeare’s tragedy in separate ways. They have separate ideas of what they keep and discard from the text, as well as how they should present it to the audience. These differences in style separate the two performances from each other. Because it has remarkable costumes and special effects, a more coherent portrayal of the original text, and superior acting, Folger’s Macbeth works better for me. While both …show more content…

The two main differences were between how they presented the witches making the potion and how they presented the three apparitions. The Folger version depicted the witches doing a tribal chant while putting all the ingredients into the cauldron. The chant along with its music made the scene very interesting and catchy. Polanski’s version had over ten witches, rather than the three that were in the original text. They had them put the ingredients into the cauldron while reciting what they were, rather than chanting them. The Folger version had the three apparitions come out of the cauldron and say their lines. They seemed very realistic and allowed the audience to see and hear what Macbeth experienced. In Polanski’s version, the witches had Macbeth drink the potion, which caused him to hallucinate and have visions of the apparitions. This interpretation was very interesting, however, it was poorly executed. It was difficult to understand what Macbeth was experiencing during the apparitions because it randomly jumped around. Because it was clear to understand and properly executed, Folger’s version of Macbeth succeeded in presenting and acting the play out to the

Get Access