After viewing two different performances of Act 4 Scene 1 of Macbeth, I have come to the conclusion that one is better than the other. The performances take on different forms of the original text. Roman Polanski’s version is in the form of a movie, while the Folger version is in the form of a play. These contrasting mediums portray Shakespeare’s tragedy in separate ways. They have separate ideas of what they keep and discard from the text, as well as how they should present it to the audience. These differences in style separate the two performances from each other. Because it has remarkable costumes and special effects, a more coherent portrayal of the original text, and superior acting, Folger’s Macbeth works better for me. While both …show more content…
The two main differences were between how they presented the witches making the potion and how they presented the three apparitions. The Folger version depicted the witches doing a tribal chant while putting all the ingredients into the cauldron. The chant along with its music made the scene very interesting and catchy. Polanski’s version had over ten witches, rather than the three that were in the original text. They had them put the ingredients into the cauldron while reciting what they were, rather than chanting them. The Folger version had the three apparitions come out of the cauldron and say their lines. They seemed very realistic and allowed the audience to see and hear what Macbeth experienced. In Polanski’s version, the witches had Macbeth drink the potion, which caused him to hallucinate and have visions of the apparitions. This interpretation was very interesting, however, it was poorly executed. It was difficult to understand what Macbeth was experiencing during the apparitions because it randomly jumped around. Because it was clear to understand and properly executed, Folger’s version of Macbeth succeeded in presenting and acting the play out to the
William Shakespeare’s masterpiece, Macbeth, is a tragedy brilliantly brought to the 21st Century by Rupert Goold. Although Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a play set in 16th Century Scotland, Rupert Goold modernizes the play by changing the setting to a Soviet-styled country and implementing modern elements into the characters and theme. Although Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Rupert Goold’s film adaptation share many ideologies and a general storyline, a difference exists in the setting, the characters, and the overall ambience of the story.
”Macbeth retold” uses themes similar to the original play but uses a modified plot to appeal to the more modern audience. Retold utilises settings to create a controversial atmosphere. In contrast Shakespeare’s Macbeth uses an array of themes, a historical plot and language features that revolve around Elizabethan times. Even though the similarities are quite apparent, there are also some less obvious differences, the differences improve the sensitive response and the understanding that a modern audience may consume.
Act Four, Scene Two of Macbeth by William Shakespeare is a very important scene. During this scene, the audience realizes that Macbeth loses all sense of humanity. Here, the murders (that Macbeth himself orders) kill innocent an innocent family. The murders that Macbeth ordered brutally slaughter a young boy on stage. Moreover, this scene is foreshadows Macbeth’s future outcomings.
Macbeth, like any play, is open to interpretation by the performers. Each separate performance is unique. The different stylistic choices made in performances of the play change the way that viewers see the characters and events. This means that while the events of the Goold and Polanski films are the same, they tell us slightly different stories. It is interesting to look at the two films in terms of their faithfulness to, and their divergences from the original text, and the effects that these choices have on their viewers.
This 2010 version of the movie Macbeth was an effective interpretation of the book, although, it was ineffective at capturing my attention and entertaining me, which was the whole purpose of a movie: to entertain you. It only captured my attention at the end, when Macduff brought back Macbeth’s decapitated
All in all, the play is all dialogue and text,meaning directors can go all on out with; costumes,sets and the like.With this freedom in direction, there are many adaptations of Macbeth by Shakespear.These adaptations and different versions of the Macbeth brings different
Prior to deciding whether or not conflict is central to the dramatic development of MACBETH, one must consider all the dramatic factors that contribute to the Shakespearean play. The gradual decline of the protagonist , the role portrayed by characters and the order in which the events occur, greatly influence the direction in which the development of the play takes place. After reading the text MACBETH, by Shakespeare and viewing the film version, directed by Roman Polanski, it is logical to see that ambition and the deceptive appearances of what really is, is central to the dramatic development of
Macbeth is a story about a knight named Macbeth who goes to the extreme to become king. In the process of becoming king he kills his best friend banquo. The scene analysed is the scene where the ghost of Banquo comes back to haunt Macbeth. The main focus is how a good story can be interpreted in a different time and place by comparing the intense dramatic tension from the same scenes but different productions from different directors. One from the director Polanski and the other from the director Kurzel.
The Dramatic Impact on a Jacobean Audience of Act 1 Scene 5 of Shakespeare’s Macbeth
There are many differences between interpretations of William Shakespeare's MacBeth. This essay wall contrast Shakespeare's original version and a movie version by Roman Polanski produced in 1970. Three major differences will be discussed.
In the beginning of the play Macbeth and Macduff are very similar in many aspects including rank, leadership, belief, and loyalty. But as the play unfolds, Shakespeare reveals these two characters are as different as night from day. In this essay I will compare and contrast the characters of the murderous Macbeth, and the forthright Macduff. I will consider their status within the Scottish society and the depth of their intelligence. I will also evaluate their actions and their relationships with other characters, including their families and I will discuss their degrees of ambition.
Dramatic techniques play significant roles in William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, allowing for the idealistic perception of the historical audience to develop into a further empathy with the characters in Macbeth. Shakespeare achieves this by playing on beliefs held in that era, such as the Great Chain of Being, and interweaves them to bring further emphasis to his themes of ambition, masculinity and the conflicting moralities/idealisms in fair and foul actions/in what can be defined as fair or foul.
Watching a theater performance allows one to escape reality for a short period of time and delve into a world full of humor, clever banter, and tragedy. William Shakespeare’s plays are no exception to this. His plays cover a spectrum of interests which attracts a wide variety of people. Shakespeare’s Macbeth was performed with its audience as its primary concern; it pays almost no attention to historical accuracy or scenic realism due to an impatient audience, and because it was written during the early Jacobean Period, it reflects
Not only is Macbeth by far the shortest of William Shakespeare’s great tragedies, but it is also anomalous in some structural respects. Like Othello (1604) and only a very few other Shakespearean plays, Macbeth is without the complications of a subplot. (Bradley, 1905) Consequently, the action moves forward in a swift and inexorable rush. More significantly, the climax the murder of Duncan takes place very early in the play. As a result, attention is focused on the various consequences of the crime rather than on the ambiguities or moral dilemmas that had
Structurally scene 1 opens with the witches gathered together reciting plans about meeting Macbeth, establishing an occult malevolence which permeates the play. The choice of starting with the witches instantly creates a mood of terror and unearthly evil, setting an unnatural and deceptive atmosphere. The third witch says, ‘There to meet Macbeth’, this intertwining of Macbeth reflects the relationship which will be made between him and the witches, and the evil which is going