preview

Compare And Contrast Montezuma And Peter The Great

Decent Essays
Open Document

Absolute Rulers: Montezuma vs. Peter the Great Montezuma and Peter the Great are two starkly contrasting rulers. One ruled in the Aztec empire from 1502-1520 in warm tropics and the other all the way across the globe in Russia from 1682-1725 amidst freezing cold winters. Despite the huge difference in location and time period these two rulers were both absolute in their ruling. Three of the most important qualities of an absolute ruler are to be a religious leader, their ability to make long lasting social effects on their people, and their ability to control all the power by themselves. Through the lens of controlling their land completely Montezuma made larger change. Whereas Peter the Great made more change in the religious affairs of …show more content…

Montezuma was more focused on consolidating his power and giving himself complete control over his people than Peter the Great. One of Montezuma’s biggest changes in this area was to get rid of all the advisors appointed by his uncle and to replace them with the children of nobles still in power. This served several purposes. Firstly Montezuma was able to shape the young adults in charge and get them to follow his views. More importantly, to a certain extent they acted as hostages. Because Montezuma had these people in his court he could get the other nobles to do what he wanted them to do for fear of their family members. They couldn’t refuse this offer due to Montezuma’s position as emperor. Thus, Montezuma seriously tightened his grip on the lands he ruled. Montezuma was also in control of his power by being the religious leader and the military, however this was not something he changed but something emperors before him had also benefited from. Peter the Great also benefited from following his predecessors as a military leader. He put himself in a position of religious power but appointed someone under himself to lead that aspect of his government, decreasing his hold of power. One …show more content…

Montezuma was undoubtedly a religious leader, but he kept the traditions and practices exactly the same. Amongst Montezuma’s people he was thought to have a stronger connection with the gods than anyone else on Earth. The main Aztec religious ceremonies that were held often involved human sacrifice which often led to unrest amongst Montezuma’s people. Peter the Great was also a religious leader but changed the church of his people in ways Montezuma did not. He got rid of what was previously known as the Patriarchate and replaced it with his own church, the Holy Synod. These were both systems that acted as the Russian Orthodox Church’s governing body. With the Holy Synod Peter the Great had more control. He got rid of many of the former church officials and had them work government jobs instead. This benefited Peter the Great because it better served his reign. It kept him in power and his government running smoothly. With these changes his goal was for religion to still play a part in his people’s lives, but he did not want it to have the same importance it was given prior to his ruling. With these adjustments to the church Peter the Great clearly religiously changed his country more than Montezuma

Get Access