Compare And Contrast Of: Four Stage Team Performance Model & The Drexxler/Sibbet Team Preformance Model

Creating Effective Teams: a Guide for Members and Leaders is a book by Wheelan (2013) designed to do as the title states; guiding members and leaders to create effective teams. Wheelan (2013) begins the book by highlighting the reasons that groups are important. Wheelan (2013) states that throughout history, “Groups have played a major role in both the survival of human beings and the development of human culture” (p. 1). The majority of the book is based on 4 stages that create a group of individuals into an effective team. The first stage is called dependency and inclusion. According to Wheelan (2013), the first stage of the group is

The features of effective team performance is set up through positive leadership, this is something which is developed and nurtured. An effective team will work together, be focused and all the time supporting each other along the way to achieve and reach goals. For a team to be effective, each team member needs to be clear on their roles and responsibilities relating to their job. Team performance will be more effective if there is respect for the leader/manager and an understanding towards their job role and responsibility. The leader/manager should also be aware of the skills or weakness within the team and be able to provide support were necessary and also utilise their strengths. Training and support will enable staff to improve

Tuckman (1965) proposed that when developing teams, groups proceed through four general stages of development, namely: Forming, storming, norming and performing.

Characteristics of effective teamwork include clear purpose, informality, participation, listening, civilized disagreement, consensus decisions, open communication, clear roles and work assignments, shared leadership, external relations, style diversity, and self-assessment. (p. 307), and high performance teams have attributes which includes participative leadership, shared responsibility, aligned on purpose, high communication, future focused, focused on task, creative talents, and rapid response. (p. 323)

The five stages of team development were first introduced by Bruce Wayne Tuckman in 1965. His research into the way teams function and coordinate provided reoccurring trends towards very specific points in the life of a team, which became the premises of each of the first four “Tuckman’s Stages.” The fifth stage was co-created by Mary Ann Jensen over a decade later. The five stages discussed in this essay are as follows: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning.

Bruce Tuckman suggests that there are four stages of team development; Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing. At the forming stage, the team needs to mature and allow relationships to establish. Everyone’s position is currently unclear so the leader must be ready to answer questions and give a lot of guidance. The storming stage is where goals need to be set. At this stage each team member is trying to establish themselves within the group however this can cause friction and power struggles. Emotional issues need to be ignored in order to achieve goals. At the norming stage, the team members are clear on what their role within the group contains. They’ve gained respect for their leader and other members in the group and make decisions together.

The team is assembled and the task is allocated. Team members behave independently, with anxieties about inclusion and exclusion. Their time is spent planning, collecting information and bonding, with an apparent willingness to conform. This can happen whenever new circumstances occur within a group, or when new challenges or projects are set within established

The assessment of a high performing team has come to pass and acknowledged. The leadership responsibility develops progressively into work that is conducted remotely, traditional company boundaries are becoming more permeable and collaborations are essential. Developing a team remains as challenge. Enthusiastic, striving, and proficient individuals are always an advantage, but they often signify different purposes, products, and can compete for influence, resources, and advancement. Katzenbach and Smith identify three types of teams. These teams consist of task forces or project groups. Slide 10-3 illustrates their components and functions. Katzenbach and Smith use a triangle to categorize the basics of teams: performance results, personal growth, and collective work. The outer perimeter focuses on skills, accountability and commitment (Barrett, D., 2014). Substantial performance encounters motivate teams unrelatedly of where they are in an organization. However, teams cannot arise s without a routine challenges that is significant to those engaged. Teams that work towards the goals and objectives of a project will encounter different undertakings as part of the action process. To improve communication and involvement, teams use methods that are intended to inspire teamwork, such as outcome-oriented meetings and regular clusters. Teams correspondingly analyze data to make guarantee improvement exertions

In today's society some corporations have achieved success by replacing the hierarchical boss-subordinate relationship with that of an empowered work team. Many corporations know the value of a high-performance team. A high-performance team has a great deal to offer to the organization. In a team environment, people are not managed, controlled or supervised. They are led by their mutual vision of the organization's purpose and goals. Teams surpass individuals working alone, especially when performance requires several abilities, verdict, and active involvement...

Team effectiveness is the capacity a team needs to perform the goals directed by the organization. A team is a gathering of people who are interdependent in their tasks, share responsibility regarding results, and view themselves as a unit embedded in an institutional or organizational system which operates within the established boundaries of that system. Teams have set up a synonymous relationship within the limitations procedures and research relating to their effectiveness while as yet maintaining their independence as two different units, as teams and their members are independent of each other's role, aptitude, knowledge or purpose versus teams and their members, who are interdependent

As the name implies, the Forming – Storming – Norming – Performing model show the four ordered stages a team must go through before they become like a well-oiled machine.

The most commonly used model to discuss team development is Tuckman’s (1965) (in Huczynski & Buchanan, 2001) forming, storming, norming and performing model. However, the team concerned more closely followed the Cog’s ladder model (see appendix 1. for full description) (Walton, 1984).

The team’s evolution will challenge Christine’s adaptability with respect to her leadership traits and with the varying situational contingencies. As the designated Team Coordinator for the group, Christine’s role is to ensure that all team members have an understanding of the team’s goal, delegate and assign responsibilities, organize the group’s structure, convey the group’s purpose, delegate responsibilities, and establish a timeline for the groups’ goals (Hartzell, 2015). The five member team has five weeks to work cohesively on a group project in which the students are to analyze a case study, submit a written analysis, and present to the class, the groups’ analysis of the case study. Immediately the group’s development of the team’s life cycle stages is apparent. At the inception of their first group meeting, the team members’ personalities are revealed. This preliminary stage, known as the forming stage of team development, has two purposes, to become acquainted with each other and to understand the team goal (Hartzell, 2015). Unfortunately, Christine

Teamwork competencies are detailed characteristics possessed by an effective team. Contributing writer of the AORN Journal D.L. Feldman suggests that “team competencies are achieved when goals are reached and team members are motivated to repeat this behavior again and share what they’ve learned with each other”, (Guglielmi, Feldman, Marco, et al, 2011, pg. 529). Google’s HR group possess all the the key team competency traits however how they developed and arrived at these traits are unclear.

One of the main factor to be considered in forming HPTs are how well or how clearly the performance goals are defined either by the team members or by the leader. Delivering high-performance depends mainly on setting these goals effectively. The best teams successfully decide plan on how to work together effectively every day. In addition, they also determine how individuals can produce collective results by making use of their skills. This kind of a common approach towards working naturally arises or is planned by the team on its own. The approach determined and set forth by a team is unique for each teams.