Compare And Contrast Rainsford And Zaroff

General Zaroff from “The Most Dangerous Game” and Montresor from “The Cask of Amontillado” are similar in several ways. They are both evil in many ways. A piece of evidence for General Zaroff Is when he put lights out in the Caribbean sea to make a false channel which caused Rainsford boat to crash on Ship-Trap island in the Mediterranean sea. One for Montresor is when he built a wall around Fortunato. Another piece of evidence that proves General Zaroff is evil is when he threatens Rainsford with his dogs if he does not play the game “I gave him his option of course. He need not to play that game if he doesn't wish to. If he does not wish to hunt, I turn him over to Ivan” (Connell 67).This means that Rainsford does not have to play a game

In conclusion, at first glance, it might seem that general Zarroff and Sanger Rainsford share little next to no difference, but after a quick analyze the contraire can be easily proven. For instance, they have different preys, different point of view of the game in addition they also hunt in a dissimilar way. Now , I wonder if I am someone’s Rainford or

Imagine this, two men who are both brave, intelligent , and competitive against each other in a deadly war called “The Most Dangerous Game”. “The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story about how General Zaroff is tired of hunting animals so he decides to hunt Humans instead. Rainsford is one of the Generals victims who has to compete in the game. Rainsford and General Zaroff's similarities are a key part in why it was hard for Rainsford to win.

The stories of “The Most Dangerous Game” and “Hunters in the Snow” have a similar story yet very different. Rainsford is shipwrecked, captured, and forced to compete in a hunt for his life. The three friends: Frank, Tub, and Kenny go on a hunting expedition that freely chose to go on, but the story would take an unexpected turn for the worse. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” the main character, Rainsford, shipwrecks on a remote island.

There are two different types of hunting. When it come to animals hunting other animals for food, they sometimes do it for fun to prove dominance. Humans hunt animals for game or to eat as well.General Zarroff remained confident, in the hunt for rainsford but failed. General Zarroff's character remains the same throughout the story while Rainsford is frightened throughout parts of the story. In the story Zarroff is hunting Rainsford because they made after Zarroff made him have to play his game and if he won he could leave the island that he ends up on, and must fight for his life during a 3 day period. General Zarroff lives on this island and traps people in it so they cannot escape and takes care of them until he can hunt them.Richard Connell uses mood/tone in his story “The Most Dangerous Game” to convey the theme of competition rarely enhances a person’s character.

But not all murder stories are not the same; this is shown clearly in the “The Most Dangerous Game”, written by Richard Connell. The author tells a story about a well-known hunter who gets shipwrecked, but who is enjoying the island. But that all turns upside down, when he experiences the true meaning of having fear when his life is at stake. Rainsford is ultimately justified in his killing of General Zaroff because he has saved the lives of many.

This Side of the Gun: An Analysis of Zaroff and Rainsford Stephen Covey said, "Strength lies in differences, not similarities." This states that two people who are so similar, like Zaroff and Rainsford from "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, can become enemies by the few differences between them. This difference is seen as the cause of the conflict between Zaroff and Rainsford. This one idealistic difference spawned by their different backgrounds caused two same minded people to seek to kill each other, in a hunt with humans as the game. Only by his wits was Rainsford able to outsmart and defeat the revered hunter General Zaroff.

There exists a unique relationship between the hunter and the hunted. Both subjects have their own distinct talents, however, even though it may not seem to be, are surprisingly uniform. Their connections can be difficult to discover, but after digging further into the character thoughts, feelings, and actions, they become more outward. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff have many similarities and differences throughout the length of the story.

First, civilized means really smart, talented, and really educated. Two men named Rainsford and Zaroff are considered themselves civilized. Rainsford likes to hunt wild animals and Zaroff likes hunting people. Rainsford and Zaroff have different hunting skills. Evidence from the story that shows Zaroff considers himself civilized, Rainsford considers Zaroff civilized, and Rainsford considers himself civilized.

A known prerequisite that has been observed in order for collaboration to occur is the recognition of the importance of other professionals for patient care as argued by (Curran, Kabene and Orchards, 2005; Cohen, Henneman and Lee, 1995). Upon further realisation an Occupational Therapy Assistant states that there is no single field that can successfully meet all of a patient’s needs and which then requires that there be collaborative efforts. Another recognition that the Occupational Therapy Assistant expressed was the importance of expertise that the patients bring to the health care process. It became an underlying theme at the participating sites that recognising the vital importance of acknowledging and respecting the expertise of all professionals

“The world is made up of two classes - the hunters and the huntees.” In the short story ‘The Most Dangerous Game’ which was written by Richard Connell there are two main characters, Rainsford and General Zaroff. Rainsford thought that General Zaroff wanted to hunt with him when in all reality General Zaroff wanted to hunt him(Rainsford) himself. Richard Connell uses irony, theme and characterization to develop the plot and characters. The use of these literary devices suggests that Connell wanted to make the story more interesting and suspenseful so the reader can enjoy reading it.

Everyone in the world has a different hunting attitude. Some, like Zaroff treat hunting as a competition where you have to work fast. Sometimes working fast can cause the hunter to become sloppy and dangerous. But to Zaroff it doesn’t matter as long as in the end you’re on top. Now how often does one take everything as a competition where you have to be the best? That is not the way Rainsford treats hunting. He is also aggressive and strives to become better, but Rainsford is more nonchalant while hunting. Rainsford is a much more diligent hunter than Zaroff.

That day came sooner than expected. My student picked a oad from south texas to the Los Angeles area. He made an excellent choice except for one reason. That reason was that load couldnt deliver early, adn it gave us a week to go just 1400 miles. We had disacussed those thigs before, but he made a mistake and we dealt with it. How, well we stayed in south texas for three days, partying at night across the border in Mexico, and sleeping it off at the terminal each day. Then we left for California. This was his trip, and I was just a buddy riding with him. He called all the shots, you know, where and when to get fuel, meals, breaks, and all the rest. WHe said he was ready, but he failed. WHy did he fail, because he was doingquite well until we

Rainsford realizes that he is in the presence of a murderer and when General Zaroff is describing how he has found a new hunt for killing, Rainsford figures out that “what (General Zaroff) speak of is murder”. The idea that someone is murdering is no joke, but General Zaroff thinks “it’s a game”. Consequently, General Zaroff’s dark side comes through because his love for hunting has caused him to commit homicide. Nevertheless, General Zaroff takes his passion for hunting to another level after he decides to only think of himself and be selfish, he hunts people because of how much he loves his hobby. Just like “The Most Dangerous Game”, “Porphyria’s Lover” shows how a man’s love only causes death and darkness.

Lastly, for my third plot example General Zaroff was trying to kill Rainsford because humans were his new big game. Zaroff tries to kill Rainsford, but really he is the one who ends up dying at the end, not Rainsford. Richard Connell uses dialogue to highlight how Rainsford and Zaroff are talking about how only one of them are going to die and the another will live happily on the bed. “Rainsford, how did you get here?” “ I swam, it was quicker than walking through the jungle.” “I congratulate you, you win the game.” “I am still a hunted animal.” “ Get ready General Zaroff.” “I see, splendid! One of us will be a meal for the dogs the another will sleep in this excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford.” (Connell pg 22) This helps to see that General was being rude by trying to kill Rainsford for his game. Also he didn’t care what