Compare And Contrast The Crime Control Model

Community corrections is continually changing and has been for the past one hundred years. From the early to mid-twentieth century onward it has used three major models, the medical model, community model, and the crime control model. The major turning point for the American community corrections system that led to corrections as we know it today was in 1974 when What Works? - Questions and Answers About Prison Reform by Martinson was published. The system changed practically overnight across the nation. The notion of rehabilitating offenders was dismissed and a more punitive “lock them up and throw away the key” mentality took over. Presently the corrections system is still working in the crime control model, but professionals are trying to restructure how we deal with criminal offenders during and after incarceration. The difficulty in the restructuring is finding the balance between punishing criminal offenders proportionate to their crime, but also rehabilitating them to be productive members of society once they are released so that they do not recidivate.

The major difference between the crime control model and the due process model of law enforcement is that crime control works to repress criminal activity, and due process works to protect a person's rights. Crime control is more focused on the community well-being, versus due process which focus's more on the person who committed the crime. Crime control also believes that it is better to detain an innocent suspect rather than let them be free until proven guilty. Obtaining evidence becomes the number one priority for crime control. Due process only allows evidence to be collected a certain way. Criminals may be allowed to go free if a there was an error in collecting evidence. For an example, in the O.J Simpson case there were issues involving

The crime-control implications for this perspective are basically based upon creating effective punishment to eliminate crime. These measures must be humane and adhere to human rights to successfully keep criminals from committing the

The “get tough approach” to crime control has been prevalent since the 1960s. This approach takes the stance to a more firm and no tolerance policy against crime, hence the term “tough” in the actual title. “"Tough" crime control normally denotes more emphasis on police resources, faster apprehension of criminals, quick trials, and more severe sentences for guilty offenders” (Skoler 1971:29). The “get tough approach” emphasizes the need to arrest and punish criminals over rehabilitation and addressing the social factors that underlie criminal behavior (Barkan and Bryjak 2011). Deterrence of other criminals through severe punishments is the primary focus. The “get tough approach” of criminal justice institutions has been under scrutiny due to the outcomes that we will discuss further on. The purpose of this paper is to simply present the pros and cons that have resulted from the “get tough approach” on crime. The paper will try and remain completely unbiased to the “get tough approach” and solely focus on results that have come from said approach. We will begin by discussing the background and history of the “get tough approach” and what led to its development. We will then discuss things such as incarceration rates (US Department of Justice), crime rates (Dilulio 1995) juveniles in prison (Hinton 2015), policies that have been implemented (Shephard 2002), correctional costs, and destabilized urban neighborhoods (Barkan & Bryjak 2011; Black 2007; Mauer 2006) that result

The only similarity between Due Process and Crime Control Model is that they both relate to the framework of the United States Constitution. They both embrace Constitutional work and values relating to our adversarial system. Both models make it known that law enforcement including prosecutors and police are not allowed to act against a person unless there is some probable cause and evidence that illustrates that they violated the law.

The long term advantages of the the crime control model would be apprehending the guilty and giving out mandatory sentencing. The crime control model also supports the death penalty that would also fall under a long term advantage. In our justice system most criminals are not given a sentence, so in the town of Bedlam there would need to be more availability in jails or prisons, which would be an example of a long term disadvantage. Though there are short term disadvantages, such as the authority of police that are hired. The law enforcement would not have to be permanent and they can also train them to handle all situations in the same manner. While the short term disadvantage for the due process model would be the violation that occurs during the process of being pulled over or strip searched. The long term disadvantage would be the

In addition to similarities, there are also many differences between the two models. According to Packer, “The Crime Control Model emphasizes that the repression of criminal conduct is by far the most important function to be performed by the criminal process because public safety is essential to personal freedom” (Zalman, 2008, p. 5). Because this statement supports that, any apprehension of an individual by authorities is guilty because of the assumption that police and prosecutors are accurate in his or her decision of arresting and detaining the correct individual people may view this as a negative component to the model. The Crime Control Model resembles a conveyor belt because it moves the alleged criminal through the system on the assumption that the alleged is guilty until proven innocent. On the other hand, the Due Process Model looks like an obstacle course. Even though this model respects the repression of crime, it does not believe that the findings of police are always accurate and the criminal justice system is subject to errors. The Due Process Model allows the alleged offender a chance to discredit any information found against him or her. If an offender is guilty of a criminal offense, he or she has the right to engage in many appeals. “The demand for finality is thus very low in the Due process Model, Packer states” (Zalman, 2008,

There are two distinct types of models that are found in the English criminal justice system. These are the crime control model and the due process model. They vary in their characteristics and are considered to take divergent objectives. Basing on their evident differences, one of them is actually considered being more effective than the other if the new wave and rate of crime being witnessed in the society is anything to go by. This paper therefore seeks to identify some of the differences between these models and point out that which is considered as effective in dealing with rate of crime in our current society.

The criminal justice field faces the challenges of getting criminals off the streets, and prosecuting them, while using limited funds and manpower. Citizens expect results, and want to feel safe when they are in their own neighborhood. On the other hand, citizens in our democratic country expect people to be treated fairly, and feel the need to make sure that no innocent people are wrongly sent to jail. It is a balancing act of keeping the community safe on one hand, and on the other, making sure that no one’s rights are violated. It is like being told to do a job, but then having all these rules and obstacles you have to navigate around in order to do your job. The following paper is a study of the differences between due

There has long been a debate over which, if any, are the most effective methods of crime control. Governments from bottom to top in our nation have poured over the issue with mixed results for as long as there has been a nation. Until very recently deterrence was completely based on fear of punishment. However, recent years have provided us with a more complete understanding of crime and its roots among the more desirable parts of our society, specifically the mind of a criminal. Through the study of psychology, specifically free will, determinism and social identity, we may find that situational crime prevention is a better means to deter crime in our nation.

Part 1: Nature, Extent, Impact of Crime Policy on Crime & the Administration of Justice in the U.S.

Then there is the “due process model.” The due process model demands reliability with a decreased importance on efficiency. Unlike the crime control model, the due process model believes that the investigative and prosecutorial fact finding is prone to error and should be investigated further by individuals other than those involved with prosecuting the case. This model can be described as the step by step examination of individual due process.

The due process model, however, asserts that a criminal justice system should be deliver fairness and follow the set processes and procedures when delivering justice. The crime control model believes that a criminal judicial system should focus on

The Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model are very important parts of our criminal justice system. Without both of these models in our system it throws things off balance and causes a lot of problems. Over the past many years our Criminal Justice System has changed and with these changes we have found better ways of keeping our system balanced. In order for our system to continue to stay in balance then the Crime Control Model and Due Process Model need to be used together.

In summary, the differences between the two models are obvious. The crime control model depends on the skill of investigative and prosecutorial officers; the due process model respects the reliability of fact-finding processes. The assembly line of the crime control model is mostly involved with competence while the due process model is interested in equality and justice for the accused. The due process model perseveres on the deterrence and riddance of errors possible; the crime control model acknowledges the possibility of errors in which inaccuracies could impede the purpose of inhibiting crime (Roach, 1999).