preview

Compare And Contrast The Cuban Missile Crisis And The Pursuit Of Disarmament

Decent Essays

In every presidency, there are many important speeches. For example, George Washington's Inaugural Address, Nixon's Checkers Speech, Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, and many more. This is not withheld from John F. Kennedy's presidency either. He, too, delivered many speeches that riled the nation. Two of his many admirable speeches are The Cuban Missile Crisis and The Pursuit of Disarmament. In these speeches, there are very different aspects, but boil down to the same conflict: Nuclear threats from Communist regions. One amazing how Kennedy captures the crisis in a different light in each speech, while still stemming from the same core belief. In The Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy meets the conflict with a defensive stature, bringing up points …show more content…

That speech was The Pursuit of Disarmament. For one, The Cuban Missile Crisis used more of Logos while this speech had more of an emotional and trusting feel. For example, when in The Pursuit of Disarmament, Kennedy states, "All we have built, all we have worked for, would be destroyed in the first 48 hours," it evokes an emotional response. Another reason is, that of the diversity in rhetorical elements, there is more of a mix that captivates the reader. It gets us, the readers, to relate to the speech easier. For example, using the quote from before, one the readers can understand just how horrible this war would become and just how urgent this matter is, considering the destruction. In addition, this speech is also better because it helps us feel like we can individually do something to help the nation. It helps give the public a sense of importance in this affair as opposed to the other speech that left the public with "the Congress will do..." And "the government will...". The final reason for this is because it got its claim across much better. One way it got across better was the way the elements were used as a said, but also how Kennedy deeply explained each step he wanted America to take. It helped get a better understanding of what he wanted us to do. In conclusion, I believe that, though Kennedy's speeches: The Pursuit of Disarmament and The Cuban …show more content…

Game theory is the study of strategic decision making in human interaction. Game theory is basically just how players think about their opponents' strategies when making their own strategies. So, for example, when Kennedy states, "For many years, both the Soviet Union and the United States, recognizing this fact, have deployed strategic nuclear weapons with great care...", so in this quote, Kennedy is expressing how the Soviets and Americans have anticipated each other's movements, so they continue to mirror each other by deploying missiles for protection. This is one example of this, another is when Kennedy writes, "The 1930s taught us a clear lesson: aggressive conduct, if allowed to go unchecked and unchallenged, ultimately leads to war,". This quote also shows how they are anticipating their opponents moves by their moves in the past. A final example of how The Cuban Missile Crisis relates to Game Theory is, as Kennedy states, "That is why this latest Soviet threat—or any other threat which is made independently or in response to our actions this week—must and will be met with determination,". This shows how because of the atmosphere that week, the U.S. anticipates the Soviets to act upon any threat, making the U.S. want to take immediate action on any threat. In conclusion, Game Theory is like The Cuban Missile Crisis because in the theory you anticipate the opponent's strategy and the U.S

Get Access