Compare And Contrast The Mechanistic Style Of Acme

Classical organizational theory supports two views. Scientific management which focuses on managing work and employees and administrative management which addresses issues which

From the perspective of this author, both types of organizations have a critical need for the right manager that focus on the right areas. Therefore, both would have to pay close attention to their stakeholders and their motivators regardless of organization type. Case in point,

It is evident that both positive and negative aspects of both approaches exist in the current climate, and from a basic understanding it can be drawn that varying aspects of each approach can nullify the negatives of the other in some manner. Consequently I believe the works of the Burns and Stalker (as cited in Grey, 2012) should be considered, in which it is suggested organizations can be seen as mechanistic and organic (roughly translated to bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic) depending on contingencies. This contingency approach would see organizations exhibiting differing behaviors based on the environmental factors that they work within and the assets that they have so that they may better suit the needs of workers, employers, consumers

The classical or traditional approach to management was generally concerned with the structure and the activities of formal organization. The utmost importance in the achievement of an effective organization were seen to be the issues such as the establishment of a hierarchy of authority, the division of work, and the span of control.

(1) Organizational firms should be divided into quasi-firms—small groups within an organization is usually more effective, (2) Accountability of quasi-firms—decisions are made on even level, based on profitability, (3) Quasi-firms should maintain their identity, including books, names, and records, (4) Motivation at the lower levels of organizations requires intellectually and spiritually challenging jobs, (5) The principle of the middle axiom—top management transcends balance of freedom of organizational control.

The organic and decentralized structure of Omega was considered an advantage for the company because it created flexibility, innovative thinking, and unity within the organization.

The leadership style from bureaucracy is more authoritarian than post- bureaucracy. One example is Ford. He segmented the entire production in smaller steps to facilitate the production. On the other hand he demanded the most of all labors. What the leaders say is one order, the order of a leader was a wish and sometimes related as a god (article). There was no discussion about the resolution and how it is going to be development. In contrast, the leaders from post bureaucracy express more concerns about the effects of decision. The decision is make where is supposed to be done.(

Although there are signs that the company has a matrix structure in place, they do not follow a programme management approach and numerous failures within the structure exist. Their approach to management is still that of a traditional organisational approach, which tends management to lack both strategic purpose and customer focus.

To be effective, Omega electronics should have some kind of hierarchy where employees feel themselves in the chain of command and there should be clear authority and responsibility of each employee. They should make sure that they communication channel within the organization is effective and transparent for the efficient and

The classical management has two basic drives namely scientific and general administrative management. Scientific management focuses on how to increase productivity whiles the administrative management theory looks at organizations in general and concentrate on how to make them effective and efficient.

The mechanistic view of an organization began with the industrial revolution. The view is a reflection of society's radical change from a rural agricultural base to one more impersonally based on centralized urban industry employing great numbers of people. The first changes began in the late 1600's and early 1700's with rudimentary machines replacing manual labor or accomplishing things not previously possible because of size, weight, or sheer numbers. The greatest industrial growth was during the 1800's period, which was exponential at its end and the outset of our century.

Group 7 Archana Menon 2008 09 A Chandan Pansari 2008 12 A Ranjani Mani 2008 43 A Sumita Das 2008 55 A

The history of management includes multiple theories and understanding them can help individuals identify the ideas their organization is built upon. Classical organizational theory encompasses several major approaches to management that continue to be influential even today. The early to mid-twentieth century included the introduction of many concepts of management theory such as scientific management, bureaucratic and administrative theory. Most of these early approaches revolved around control of employees and processes in order to achieve more

First, I will discuss the exemplary management theories that transpired around the twentieth century. These involve scientific management, which center of attraction was on associating per-sonnel and jobs to increase effectiveness; and administrative management, which center of atten-tion is on recognizing the principles that will impel to the beginning of the nearly adept structure of management and organization. Next, you have behavioral management theories which was estab-lished both prior and subsequently the Second World War, which spotlight was on supervisors should guide and supervise their personnel to optimize their effectiveness. Then you have man-agement science theory, which was current during the Second World War and which has evolved to be very

The senior management team at Aztec Component Supplies knew that they were facing a decision crucial