Compare And Contrast The Pantheon In Athens And The Parthenon

Building the Parthenon was a greater feat than they ever would have known. Work on the Parthenon began in 477 BC. A much smaller shrine already stood on this site, one to which we can attribute various pieces of surviving decorative material--lions and snakes, a cornice incised with flying birds, and a blue-bearded trinity that may conceivably represent Cecrops, Erechtheus, and Poseidon. If such an edifice in fact existed, it was torn down to make way for a huge limestone platform, roughly 252 by 103 feet in size, that was built as a base for the new temple. The slope of the Acropolis was such that while on the north side the foundations rested directly on bedrocks, the southeast corner needed to be built up with no

The Greeks finished building an exquisite temple to their beloved goddess, Athena in the year 432 BCE. (Sayre 60). The name of this enriched, unique temple was the Parthenon. The Parthenon took the Greeks approximately fifteen years to complete and as Pericles stated, it was built to give gratitude to their goddess Athena for the salvation of their city, Athens and all of Greece in the Persian Wars (Sayre 60). It was also a symbol of their power and superiority among other cultures. It was something the Greeks took great pride in and recognized it to a great extent. The Parthenon was built on the highest point of the city of Athens to look over the precious Greek city. On the exterior walls of the Parthenon there was beautiful artwork that

Many similar characteristics are used throughout the Classical and Early Empire when the construction of temples was being built. Though old techniques were used, the advancement of new methods were being introduced to build faster, stronger, and in different shapes and sizes. We will discuss the Parthenon and the Pantheon; though similar in name, they do have some differences that represent the Greek and Roman styles.

Many people consider the Parthenon to be an extraordinary building. Why is this building so celebrated and influential? The purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the building’s history, examine the intricate architectural choices, and explore the extent to which selected Classically-inspired architectural works have taken influence from the Parthenon.

From the outside of the Pantheon the dome seems shallow and insignificant, said to be purposely done not to ruin the "suprise" of the interior (Gilbert 379). It is only when viewing the inside that one can truly appreciate the amazing architectural design and workmanship of this building. Another remarkable attribute of this temple to the gods is that it is still in use today with much of the original materials intact. The columns, the marble paneled walls, the floor, and the two enormous bronze doors are all originals, making the Pantheon the best preserved surviving Roman structure. The Panthenon can be viewed at the following site which shows many pictures of the interior and exterior of this truly remarkle building: http://www.kent.wednet.edu/curriculum/soc_studies/rome/Pantheon.html

The Rome’s Pantheon and Greek’s Parthenon are both significant and innovative structures that have influenced the architecture around the world. This essay will describe the style and function of each building as well as the similarities and differences between ancient Greece and Rome in four characters including history, design, usage, and similarity.

The ancient Greek civilization contributed many great new ideas and aspects to everyday life that shaped and inspired the modern day society. The Greeks are well known for their construction of temples, acropolis’ and other grand architectural structures. Among these structures stood one of the most famous, the Parthenon. The Parthenon was a symbol of Greek society and culture as it stood as one of Greece’s most important architectural buildings.

Architecturally, societally and religiously, the Parthenon of Athens and the Pantheon of Rome share many similarities and some important differences. Fortunately, these wonders of the ancient world have survived to give us some idea of their construction and use.

The Parthenon and the Pantheon are both amazing and detailed buildings. Although the Parthenon was built in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome, both of these buildings share some similarities, but are also different as well. In this paper I will share how the similarities and differences between Ancient Greece and Rome are seen in these two buildings.

The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the Parthenon in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome. There were two questions asked which were for us to “consider how the style and function (use) of each building serves as a typical example of its culture.” And also “How are the similarities and differences between ancient Greece and Rome seen in these two buildings?”. The buildings were built a few hundred years apart and while they do have differences they also have similarities. One of the main similarities is that they are both ancient temples, one being built in Greece and the other in Rome.

The House of the Virgin, [1] versus a temple for Every Divinity, [2] built using two completely different construction techniques, both are equal in magnificence. Let’s start by exploring how both temples where constructed. We will begin with the Parthenon, if only because it was built five hundred fifty seven years prior to the Pantheon.

The word Pantheon is derived from the Greek word "pan”, which means "all” and "theos” which means "god”. The Roman culture seems to borrow on the Greek classical culture. The style and the function of these classical ancient temples show that Greeks and Romans were worshipers of many gods; and were a religious society. They provide invaluable information about the past, portrays great technical skills, lifestyle and social structures.The Parthenon shows Greece superiority in technology advancement, which gave birth to an age of philosophers.The two structures having been constructed from marble (Parthenon) and granite and concrete (Pantheon), shows that those were the raw materials available in those days. These ancient cultures portray people who also were political in their days and they loved to pass strong messages through art (classical buildings).

The Parthenon and The Pantheon are two legendary monuments constructed respectively on 447 BC and 126 AD. Besides being both ancient temples, they also present some other similarities along of their differences. In the line below, we will discuss them in details. The most predominant visible similarity between the Parthenon and the Pantheon are the gigantic columns that characterized the structures.

Comparison between Parthenon and Pantheon 　　　　Despite the similarity in the name, Parthenon and Pantheon are different constructions built in two different places. Parthenon is a Greek temple to goddess Athena built in 126 AD(Reed College, The Parthenon (2015)), where as Pantheon is an Italian temple to all the gods of ancient Rome built between 447 and 438 BC (Wikipedia, Pantheon, Rome (2015)). There are many differences and similarities between them, too many to explain in one essay, so I will mainly ague on their structural and sculptural aspects. First of all, when you look at Parthenon, the shape of the building is a simple rectangular shape with most of the parts filled with entasis columns. On the other hand, although some entasis

Many often lump Greek and Roman culture into one movement. The Greeks were an influence on the Roman Empire in everything from their art, architecture, and mathematics to their political structure. Though they are separated by over 500 years, the building of the Parthenon and Pantheon were each hugely significant architectural strides for each culture. Each has their similarities, as well as differences. On a whole, they set the way for the architects of the future with their vision.