preview

Compare And Contrast The Social And Economic Effects Of Silver Dbq

Decent Essays
Open Document

From the mid-sixteenth to early eighteenth century, the global flow of silver had both social and economic effects. Silver, as commodity and currency would create an all-encompassing network of global trade in the sixteenth century. The primary flow of silver during the 1570 - 1750 were Spanish America and Tonegawa, Japan since they both had major silver mines. Ming Chinese governments began to pay official salaries and collect taxes in silver. In 1571, the Manila Galleons carried silver from the Americas to Asia and Spain, and returned with silk, ivory, spices, and other goods that allowed Europeans to obtain resources and trade heavily with Asian goods. By the end of the eighteenth century, silver had begun to lose its worth. Silver declined …show more content…

China and Spain had social effects by having negative effect on lower social classes. In the Ming dynasty, Ye Chunji explains that China must pay in silver for taxes and to limit wedding expenses, therefore people are able to pay taxes if more money is left over (Document 1). Since Ye Chunji is a county official that he earned through the Chinese civil service exam, he has to limit wedding expenses since he is following the Confucian value of frugality and disapproval of greed. He also urges people to be frugal so that they can use their silver to pay their taxes since he represents the Ming government whose first priority is to make sure people can pay their taxes. This explains the social effects of Chinese silver since nobles have more money to spend freely, while the poor must save money to buy necessities. Earlier, taxes were paid in …show more content…

A British merchant, Ralph Fitch describes trade conducted by the Portuguese a great advantage in China since it reveals the mercantilist rivalries among European countries competing for East Asian trade dominance (Document 4). The purpose of this document is to show that a British merchant is concerned that Britain is missing out on opportunities to profit from global trade. Britain could make a great deal of money to be made in this trade if they could participate. This explains that the British want to have the world trade dominance. Eventually the Europeans became reluctant to continue shipping so much silver to East Asia. This is largely because they preferred to hoard the silver so that they could use it to pay mercenaries in their ongoing wars. An English scholar, Charles D’Avenant shows the English position on trade in 1697 that the global flow of silver’s influence on the mercantilist tendencies of European nations and the amount of silver leaving (Document 8). The purpose of this document is to show that D’Avenant concedes that there are problems with the Asian textile trade that the imported items have little use for people in Britain. Also that D’Avenant points out that Asia do not buy anything from the Europeans. This shows that silver might be leaving the country to be “buried” in China since the large demand for luxury goods. From 1500 to 1800, Mexico and Peru produced about

Get Access