Compare And Contrast The Therapeutic Alliance

Over the time in this course I have been drawn to the Person – Centered Theory, I feel like that is what my personality is like, and I would love to continue to grow strong and practice theory that comes natural to me. This is the theory I scored highest on my Selective Theory Sorter- Revised Questionnaire. Person-Centered therapy will have great significance to my development as a professional counselor for the reason that I already think of myself as a very authentic, sympathetic and accepting person. I am an excellent listener, and I have learned to process my thoughts before I speak. I think that a consoling therapist/client relationship is indispensable to the counseling process. Another reason I like this psychotherapy/theory is because

Historically, the alliance construct refers to the effective relationship between the therapist-patient and varying aspects of the alliance have been studied, for example, the relationship and outcomes (Horvarth & Bedi, 2002, Lustig et al, 2002), the role of the alliance (Horvarth & Luborsky, 1993) and the therapist’s behaviours that predict the alliance (Duff and Bedi, 2010) and failures in the alliance (Duff & Bedi, 2010). Lambert & Barley (2001) argue that a supportive alliance accounts on average for 30% of the variance in outcomes, whereas theory and techniques only accounts for 15% of the variance in outcomes. In comparison to the coaching relationship, the reverse is true as the same study (Grant, 2014) indicate theory and techniques account for 18.49% of the variance in outcomes whereas a supportive

Person Centered Therapy was developed by Carl Rogers in the 1940’s and 1950’s. It remains a relevant technique practiced today. This article researched the relevance of Person Centered Therapy since Carl Rogers’s death in the late 1987. The article determined the relevance of this by using three measures. First, how often Person Centered Therapy was included in organizations, journals, and institutes dedicated to this approach. Secondly, it researched how often Person Centered Therapy was included in new research since Rogers’s death. Finally, any current research that has validated Roger’s core conditions (Kirschenbaum & Jourdan,

Often social workers are faced with having to choose from a wide variety of practice approaches, models, and methods when working with clients. Understanding which approach is appropriate to use with your client is imperative. “Paying equal attention to people and their environments is a critical aspect when choosing the appropriate approach, as each client and situation is unique” (Gitterman & Heller, 2011). For this critical analysis of the therapeutic approach known as Person-Centered Therapy, I will be outlining the ‘core conditions’, which guide the counselors approach. The reason I chose to highlight this

As important as the bond between a client and therapist is advantageous for therapy, it does not constitute the fullness of the relationship. Clients also bond with

It is crucial for the family system to have a mutual relationship during a counseling session. This is where the concept of alliance is executed. The sense of trust and a family bond will allow all parties to work together as well as the client’s being able to trust that the therapist will have their best interest at hand is an example of therapeutic alliance at work. This is what the concept of alliance has done in helping relationship amongst the client, family members and the therapist. Psychology students determined that self-efficacy proved to show a positive relationship to client outcomes when the client received consistent feedback from

Person center therapy has many names such as client-centered therapy, person-centered counseling and Rogerian psychotherapy. The theory I chose to write about is called person-centered theory. In this paper I will talk about the strength and weakness of this type of therapy. How is it used in today’s society and how it was used in the past. I will also talk about the developer of Person-center therapy.

Therapeutic relationship is defined as the collaboration and attachment between the client and therapist that focuses on meeting the health care needs of the client (Bordin, 1979). In this relationship, the therapist without prejudice shows Empathy, insight, understanding and acceptance of the client. Duan and Hill (1996) defined Empathy as “feeling into” the experience of the client. Over the years, the research evidence keeps piling up, and indicating a high degree of Empathy in a Therapeutic relationship is possibly one of the most potent factors in bringing about positive outcome in the therapy

There are a many of factors, client or therapist focused that affect the counselor’s diagnosis or the client motivation to participate in the counseling process. The overarching correlation between influence of treatment and the client consideration to take part in the recovery process is the therapeutic alliance is key element of creating favorable results in psychotherapy (Lynch, 2012). This alliance begins during the client’s initial intake. Consequently, the information gathered is critical in determining the proper course of action for the client’s healing and transformation process with mental health issues. According to, Lynch (2012) a counselor’s experience does not invariably enhance the odds of forging favorable outcomes in

In this essay I will look at the claim that Person-Centred Therapy offers the therapist all that he/she will need to treat clients. Firstly, I will outline what Person-Centred therapy is and look at what its originator, Carl Rogers’, theories behind this approach are. I will then discuss some of the criticisms that have been made about Person-Centred Therapy, and weigh them up to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this therapeutic approach. In the conclusion I will reflect on my learning, and on my own experiences and opinions.

The pressure to conform can be immense. As a result, because we have a deep need to feel valued, we tend to deny to our awareness those of our inner experiences that we believe will not be acceptable. Originally described as non-directive, this form of therapy moved away from the idea that the counsellor was the expert and towards a theory that trusted the actualising tendency of clients to find their own personal potential. The term ‘actualising tendency’ is one which Rogers uses to describe the human urge to grow, to develop, and to reach maximum potential. It is directional and present in all living things, but can sometimes be suppressed. The person-centred therapist aims to provide an environment in which the client does not feel under threat or judgement. This enables the client to experience and accept more of who they are as a person, and reconnect with their own values. The client is then able to let down their defences and gain a better perception of themselves. This environment is achieved when being in a therapeutic relationship with someone who demonstrates the three essential characteristics: empathy, congruence and respect. The nature of the relationship is crucial for the success of therapy. Although therapy in a person-centred manner does not have as much structure as some other methods, it is a highly effective way of encouraging personal growth. Person-centred therapy sees the individual as a whole, and one aspect central to development is the

Therapeutic alliance has a few principles. The loyalty dimension appears to be the main principle of this therapeutic form. Loyalty between the couple and the therapist is very important within this model. There is also an importance of the therapist to establish what is called “meta-alliance” with the couple and their loyalty. The point of the therapist to form “meta-alliance” to try to help the couple prevent/avoid splitting the relationship can make martial distress more important that individual symptoms during treatment. Other principles of therapeutic alliance include family-of origin, gender concerns, and clinical implications (Garfield, 2004).

Throughout recent years, the emphasis placed on the importance of the therapeutic relationship in counselling, coaching and mentoring has dramatically increased. The therapeutic relationship between practitioner and client during the treatment is one of trust, due to a reciprocal understanding, where practitioners and clients must actively work together to make it succeed (Ackerman and Hilsenroth, 2003). The relationship between the practitioner and client is important because it is crucial to analysing the client and their objectives, without it, the client may not feel comfortable enough to discuss themselves in the detail required for the practitioner to understand their behaviour. If there is a poor relationship from the beginning, then many clients will prematurely terminate their sessions (Horvath and Luborsky, 1993). Therefore, it is no surprise that the quality of the therapeutic relationship is a consistent predictor of intervention success (McCabe and Priebe, 2004), correlating even more highly than specialised therapies (Lambert and Barley, 2001). Overall, without a strong therapeutic relationship, the client may fail to engage in treatment, as they will unwilling to work with someone they have no rapport with.

The initial client contact with the therapist is one of building trust, confidentiality and the

A therapeutic relationship is a professional, inter-personal alliance in which the nurse and client join together for a defined period to achieve health-related treatment goals (Chauhan & Long, 2000), which may only last for a short period of time but