preview

Compare And Contrast The Treaties Of Kanagawa And The Treaty Of Shimoda

Decent Essays

There were two fundamental treaties signed between Japan and the West. These two treaties were labelled as the Treaty of Kanagawa and the Treaty of Shimoda. Both treaties were unmistakeably benefitting the West. The inequity between Japan and the West, whether it be in Russia’s or America’s favour, can distinctively be identified when they are read. The Treaty of Kanagawa was a contract signed between Japan and the U.S during 1854. The treaty of Shimoda was a deal between Japan and Russia. The primary reason the West degraded Japan so brutally is because Japan were so primitive in terms of their weaponry and industrialisation. And one way they derided the Japanese were by their highly partisan deals, at gunpoint.
The first treaty, the Treaty …show more content…

Their lack of weaponry meant that Japan couldn’t risk retaliation because they had witnessed the sheer force of Commodore Perry’s warships that landed in Edo (now Tokyo) on July 8, 1853. The warship of the west could have eradicated a whole coastal town in a matter of minutes. Tokugawa Japan just didn’t have the technology to go to war with the West despite the strict policy on no western influence on the country. Japan were still in the age of samurai and hand to hand battles while other countries had developed guns and warships. Japan had not seen anything similar to the likes of the warship that had pointed its cannons at Tokyo harbour on the day the Perry step foot into Japan. No country would have insulted another foreign country the way America and Russia did if that country had strong firepower and an extensive arsenal. Japan would have never agreed to sign the treaty if they were superior in terms of their armouries. But they were helpless against the warships which was the only reason they signed the contracts. The disrespect that foreign countries had shown Japan could have been avoided if Japan had a stronger military and

Get Access