The Two side of the civil war The civil war raged acroos the nation from 1861 to 1865 was the violent conclusion to decades that begin of the nineteenth century, the North and South followed a dfferent paths developing into the distinct and very different regions. The north economy had small farms then large plantations, they had commerce industry aand the urban area resources they had larger cites(New York had the largest inhbitants)then the south had the north was a free states, the emergenc of the middleclass from the south to the north and from all over europe it was for the north i age of reforms they had industry especially New England had the most precentge of the middleclass pepole and the had small manufacturing industries, capitalists
Union and the Confederacy. The Union and the Confederacy would have gone to war anyway without it because people already determined which side that they would choose . For the Confederacy's military strategy come to found out that they only protected its boundaries so that they could fulfill independence and political strategies. The Confederate constitution had dominated gradual emancipation. As for the Union leaders military strategy they were using a pugnacious military campaign to reinstall the Union and the political strategies were using secession as an attack on representative government. I would say that the Union was more successful because with their strategy they deciding to come up with a campaign to restore the Union and that their
1. The North after the Civil War were festering with new ideas. There was rebuilding in need, the economy for the North was very beneficial and new markets and factories were producing more products than ever. With the booming of factories, bankers and investors made profits and used the money for funding for better inventions and better quality ways to produce goods. The industry grew and powered more natural resources, many cities were established and more lived in urban areas.
Although it is clear that the Union was the victor of the Civil War, it is important to compare and contrast the differences between the Confederacy and the Union that caused this to be so. Each had different styles and quality of leadership, resources, and military strategies. These different items all contributed to different parts of the war and ultimately resulted in the Union’s win.
Railroads are not nearly as popular in the United States as they are in European countries. Prior to the American Civil War, railroads were a fairly new, and untried, invention. Compared to carriages and the other modes of transportation at the time, the railroad was far superior. Due to this superiority, they were used to transport soldiers, food, and supplies. A systemic railroad began to spread all across the nation, and both sides of the war used them to their advantage.
After the long battles that made up the infamous, Civil War, the North ended up taking the victory after the South surrendered. The North won the civil war with the help of having an advanced industrial economy rather than an environmental economy. The industrial economy brought in people because of the job opportunities and because of this the population of the North sky rocketed. Also, the agricultural or environmental economy in the south limited the army and were less advanced with technology. Their loss with technology helped the North since they did have the knowledge, they overpowered the South with that kind of economy.
The Union also known as the North, fought against the Confederate States of America also known as the South. The North and South had their own strategies. The South had to fight a defensive war as much as possible. They had to draw out the war as long as possible and get the North tired of fighting. The South asked for help from foreign countries like England or France.
Contrast- The Union army was very large to where the Confederate was small. The Union had better artillery, to where the Confederate had to steal their artillery. The Union army was mainly immigrants, the Confederate army wasn’t immigrants. The union had 22 million and the confederate had 9 million.
Before the Civil War, the United States of America weren’t so united. They were suffering from extreme sectionalism, which was growing as the years were progressing. The southern states became angry at the northern states, and vice versa. Both sides had opposing views on many subjects, driving a larger space between the two. During the years leading up to the Civil War, tensions between the two sides rose almost exponentially.
Before the Civil War, the North and the South were very different. Their values were completely different. The North was more industrialized, urbanized, and was more reliant on wage labor. On the other hand, the South continued to be a rural, agricultural society, and depended on slavery to harvest the cash crops that they made a living off of. Such big differences brought about the Civil War. Was there something that could have been done to avoid the Civil War in the first place?
The American Civil War is probably one of the worst wars in American history. A brother versus brother battle about rather or not there should be slavery. The leader of the Northern Union was Ulysses S. Grant while the leader of the South was Robert E. Lee. These two men had vastly different worldviews although they did share something in common, the need to win the war.
Despite the unexpected hardships the Union faced, the Civil War ended with an overwhelming Union victory. However, due to the context of total war, the South was left in shambles. Following the Civil War was an Era known as Reconstruction-the process of Southern states to be reentered into the United States. What started as a peaceful reconciliation almost ignited a whole new Civil War. Although both the North and the South sparked tremendous amounts of damage, which destroyed Reconstruction the most? The South destroyed Reconstruction due to their strong opposition to the idea of Reconstruction and free civil rights for slaves.
There is no question that the disagreements in the Civil War between Northern and Southern states were over the economy as well as state rights. Yet, the confederate flag was a valiant symbol of slavery and the mistreatment of African American people. “The Confederacy was based on the defense of slavery, and it benefited from the usually coerced, but sometimes willing, labor of black people” (Chapter 11 pg.253). For example in the South, slavery was a major reason for why the Southern states needed to win. By losing, it meant slavery would be abolished in both Southern and Northern states. “Lincoln’s announcement gave the Confederate states one hundred days to return to the Union” (Chapter 11 pg.240). Prime example of this was when the Southern
The challenges that the Union and the Confederacy faced during the Civil War were very different. Critical weaknesses that seemed unfit for war, plagued the opposing American forces, and would serve to be a continuous obstacle that would need to be conquered by patriotism of the people, for their opposing views. To allow for both sides to be competitive, the efforts put forth had to mold to the varied needs of the armies by both the civilian population and their militaries. To the people in the south the similarity to the colonists in the Revolutionary War, was assimilated to their separatist cause in the Civil War and would be their drive to compete with the dominating Northern states. This mindset started the Confederacy in the Civil
The Roman Republic was a system of procedures formed by tradition; there was no written constitution or legally binding legislation. Precedent and consensus set procedure creating the parameters for acceptable behaviour. However, it was near the end of the 2nd century BC, where the system began to deteriorate and fall, ultimately causing the civil war in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attempt to stabilise the administrative system of government and essentially control Rome. Caesar himself ignited the civil war as a result of the unstable Roman Republic, major events such as rebellion and revolts, senate and the political sphere and the breakdown of the triumvirate, which fuelled the motive for civil war. The corrupted Roman system alongside with personal issues and disagreements became the catalyst for the civil war of 49 BC and consequently set the parameters for the new dictatorial Roman world.
The Northern states had a largely industrial economy. The coastal states were filled with port cities to ship out manufactured goods to other places around the world. Capitalism was in full swing, with all sorts of factories popping up everywhere. The industrial