preview

Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan And The Articles Of Confederation

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Virginia Plan suggested for a bicameral legislative branch. The Constitutional Convention originally was held in Philadelphia to alter the Articles of Confederation, the federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. James Madison, headed the Virginia Delegates, he shapes the debate by instantly drawing up and presenting a proposal. Edmund Randolph, then Governor of Virginia officially put the suggestion before the Convention on May 29, 1787. (loc.gov)
The Virginia Plan's 15 solutions stretched the debate to include what form the structure and power of the national government would take. It was the first document to produce a separation of powers between the three branches of government executive, legislative, and judicial branch. The Virginia Plan also …show more content…

Congress had the exclusive power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. Disputes between states and territorial problems were to be sent to Congress. The document also insisted on that Canada was allowed to enter the Union if they desired. Once the American colonies became free from the British Empire, the citizens didn’t have anyone to govern them and which ensures the country would stay on a sleek and stable course. The Articles of Confederation resolved by putting the Congress in power and giving it the authority to make decisions for the new nation. (History.com/articleofconfederation)
It promoted trade and travel. The freedom of movement wasn’t always thinkable when America was under the control of Great Britain. This all has changed, though, when the Articles of Confederation implemented. People were allowed to travel throughout the 13 states and/ or trade with other people, which gives them the chance to seek a better life for themselves. Except for the people that have committed crimes.

Get Access