Compare and Contrast the ways in which the poet describes the breakdown if the relationship. Comment on the effectiveness of their verse-craft
I chose to compare the poems: An Anniversary, by Vernon Scannel
Dismissal, by John Tripp
A Winters Tale, by D.H. Lawrence
In the poem “An Anniversary'; the poet describes the relationship and it’s breakdown as two leaves on a river, this is and example of ‘Personification’. In contrast to this poem in the poem “Dismissal'; Tripp describes the breakdown very much as it was, describing two people in a dreary pub, this is an example of ‘Pathetic fallacy’ as the setting is very boring and dark like the breakdown of the
…show more content…
The poet uses a lot of contrasts in this poem:
“The sky’s smeared monotone.';
“Once, on a branch in the sun, they danced';
This contrasts the happiness in the relationship before the breakdown to the boring monotone they have between each other now.
The poet uses vivid imagery all the way through the poem to describe the two leaves; he also uses “Personification'; the way that he describes the two leaves as people.
The tone of the poem changes as at the beginning when the poet is describing the relationship now it is quite morose, as the two leaves are no longer together. At the end he is describing the relationship before the breakdown and the tone is quite happy. This is an example of ‘Pathetic Fallacy’ as the tone reflects and complements what the poet is talking about.
Some examples of “Alliteration'; in the poem are:
“stream slides';
“stares …..slithering';
“sky’s smeared';
“shimmering skin';
They are all S sounds, this complements the flowing, smooth, gliding rhythm of the poem.
In the poem “Dismissal'; the poet describes the relationship breakdown very much like a story. In the whole poem he uses “Enjambment'; and the poem has a very continuous rhythm he also doesn’t use rhyme or assanance which also adds to its story-like quality.
The poet describes;
“To this day I remember that alcove:
As her husband emerges from the surf in the last stanza, the tone of the poem switches from one of darkness and fear, to one that is philosophical: “Once you lose someone
Each part was broken up after a noticeable shift and atmospheric changes in the poem. The first part of the poem is during “Sad is the man...with one”(Ln 1-2), and repeats again at “In a room...on his father”(Ln 6-9). These lines create a shift into a narrative stage. It puts a pause on the poem to introduce or explain the scene in the poem. The narrative is important because it shows the point of view of the poem. The second shift is created with “Already the man...should never disappoint”(Ln 10-18). This shift is when the father is thinking about his fears and desires, to be more blunt, the father’s fantasies. It creates an unrealistic tone to the poem an shows the father’s dismay when he cannot remember a story for his son. The last shift begins with “His five-year-old...scratches his ear”(Ln 3-5), and ends with “But the boy...up to silence”(Ln 19-23). This shift bring the poem into reality. In fact the poem states that the “emotional rather than logical equation”(Ln 20) is where most people get confused and frustrated at the world. The poem also states the conflict of fantasy and reality. This conflict is what creates the the multiple shifts and the complicated relationship between the father and the
The author uses imagery in the poem to enable the reader to see what the speaker sees. For example, in lines 4-11 the speaker describes to us the
The main aspect of the poem is the obvious tone shift from lighthearted comedy to contemplating sadness, starting slowly between the second and third stanza and slowly building up more and more as the poem continues. This foil accentuates the emotion of the poem, making the ending all the sadder. This sadness becoming evident in the last stanza of the poem, where the couplet pattern breaks in an
The poem has no rhyme scheme or particular rhythm; this makes the descriptions stick out more to the reader, while having a varied sound when it is written
Kate Chopin’s “Story of an Hour,” and Charlotte Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper,” present similar plots about two wives who have grown to feel imprisoned in their own marriages. “The Yellow Wallpaper,” focuses on a woman who feels so entrapped in her own marriage that she begins to feel this type of isolation and imprisonment all around her. She begins to feel as though the room, in which she is being forced to stay in is a prison in itself. “Story of an Hour,” has a similar plot of a woman in an unhappy marriage. This woman however, momentarily escapes her unhappiness when she comes to find out that her husband was thought to have been killed
In The Namesake based on the book and movie by Jhumpa Lahiri, there are several events and scenes that are interpreted differently throughout the film and book. The book is based on Gogol Ganguli, the son of immigrant parents Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli who struggles with his double identity and rebellion towards his family. The movie is quite different with its focus on the parents and their relationship more than Gogol, the main character. The characters in the book that are portrayed by the actors in the film are very important because it subtracts and diverts the focus of Gogol’s struggles who is the heart of the novel.
The reader can visualize the past loves with the rain constantly tapping on her window waiting for her response (Millay 3-5). The metaphor illuminates her sadness because they, the ghosts, are trying to communicate but she cannot remember them so she gives them no response. Furthermore, Millay compares herself to a “lonely tree” (Millay 9), from which all the birds have flown away, thus illustrating how all her loves have left her. These metaphors illustrate how the lovers have left and she is now alone with just the feeling but not the person. Addiotnally, throughout the poem Millay uses depressing diction in order to express her heartache.
Compare and Contrast the ways in which two Poets create Sympathy for their Characters – ‘On a Portrait of a Deaf Man’ and ‘The River God’.
Have you ever read a poem that cached your eye? Ever wondered how that poem is similar to others or different? Perhaps you read a poem about animals, the economy or someone’s feelings. The poems I, Too and The Negro Speaks of Rivers by Langston Hughes, have many important similarities and differences. One could have been when he was young and the other when he was older. He describes what he’s seen and done in The Negro Speaks of Rivers. In the poem I, Too, he describes what he wants to do. In both of these poems they cross a point where it is noticeable what they have in common. Both have very strong views, along with the positive attitudes that he has towards inequality and discrimination. He attempts to get
poem is put there to be a representation of the separation and the separator between the two
While it is a contrast in attitude, the fact that these two poems follow through a series of events only to tell what they do as a result at the end is a similarity between the poems. This contrast is one of the few however, and much more clearly, it is shown that both women feel their worlds falling apart after being abandoned by these love interests. “God topples from the sky” (“Mad Girl’s Love Song 10) for one and “The colored tents all topple in the bay” (Denouement 16) for the other. They cannot continue on with their lives as they did before because of this absence. These speakers have depended on their lovers like plants depend on rain so that they may live.
Compare and Contrast the ways in which the poet describes the breakdown if the relationship. Comment on the effectiveness of their verse-craft
Pathetic fallacy is used to represent the inner feelings of the girls so that their whole neighborhood can fell their suffering “The sky grew darker, and the light abandoned the daytime”. This could also be interpreted as a cry for help from these girls by using the weather as a sign to those in the outside world. It does also represent that the girls are losing faith, probably in their religion and the holy and faint light inside them is dying out as it is being consumed by the darkness growing inside them and is being feed with grief and silent pain that the girls are going through. Eugenide’s uses semantic field to again use nature to portray the Lisbon girls’ emotions “the trees in the yard dropped, a cloud always hovered over the Lisbon’s house, steamed clouds” and I think he does this because he shows the reader that the girls are rarely physically seen so they are instead described through an alternative source which is nature.
The final poem could be considered an epilogue to the cycle. It gives a short summary of the couple’s time together and states the irrevocable truth that it has come to an end. The decay of autumn that the speaker feared in the previous poem has progressed, and the once beautiful plants turn now against him and chase him out of the disintegrating garden. The fifteenth song is the longest of the cycle and starts with a piano introduction that similarly to the poem reminisces on past events and expresses the speaker’s all-encompassing hopelessness and despair. The text’s emotional qualities inspire my intense, speaking tone at the beginning, the dynamic contrasts and a warm and tender touch for the speaker’s bittersweet recollection of past joys.