preview

Compare And Contrast The Wife Of Bath's Tale And The Canterbury Tales

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Canterbury Tales are a collection of stories written by Geoffrey Chaucer that were originally told by a group of thirty people traveling to Canterbury, England. The group of people are telling these stories in order to make their trip to Canterbury entertaining, and to win a dinner paid in full by the rest of the group. Two of the best stories told out of the group are the “Nun’s Priest’s Tale” and the “Wife of Bath’s Tale.” The “Nun’s Priest’s Tale” is a story told about a chicken who has a dream of a fox attacking him, and his dream eventually comes true. The “Wife of Bath’s Tale,” however, is about a knight who is forced to go on a quest to figure out what women truly want, and discovers what they truly want in the end after being told …show more content…

This story begins with the handsome Chanticleer, a rooster who has seven wives to cater to him. He has his eyes on one particular hen, and her name is Pertelote. One night, as all the hens are sleeping, Chanticleer has a horrible dream of a fox attacking him. Pertelote then proceeds to scold him for being such a coward, and tells him he is just constipated. Chanticleer then refutes Pertelote’s statements and tells her how there have been instances of dreams coming true in real life. Later on, Chanticleer ends up being correct about dreams coming true, because the fox from his dream comes and abducts him from his own pen. Somehow, Chanticleer convinces the fox to let him go, and then the story ends. The plot of this story is actually pretty good. It has pretty interesting dialogue and it also has suspenseful bits and pieces in it, such as Chanticleer getting taken by the fox. However, the “Nun’s Priest’s Tale” is just too silly. The plot does not really seem that serious, as the entire story portrays human actions and feelings through chickens, and it might make one feel uncomfortable. It is also a little unrealistic, because dreams do not usually ever come true, and talking chickens are not a real thing. The “Nun’s Priest’s Tale” is fine as a whole, but since its plot is a little foolish, it really should not win the …show more content…

This story teaches several different morals. The first moral it teaches is that one should not trust a flatterer. This is learned right after Chanticleer believes the fox when the fox says that Chanticleer is a great singer. Chanticleer is then tricked into singing for the fox, and then the fox attacks Chanticleer. Another moral from this story that is learned is that one should keep their eyes peeled at all times. This is because when Chanticleer is attacked, he has his eyes closed. If his eyes were open, the attack would not have happened. The last moral that is taught in this story is that one should keep their mouth shut. One can learn this moral from when the fox opened his mouth to brag about capturing Chanticleer, and when the fox does so, Chanticleer escapes from his reach. These morals are not that important in life, nor do they apply in every situation. One should not have to believe that they should not accept flattery, because that is very rude. Not every flatterer is lying about what they are saying, or wants to cause trouble like the fox. In addition, if someone does not want to be aware of their surroundings all the time, then they are completely fine. Not everyone is going to get attacked in every situation that they are not paying attention. People should also not have to keep their mouth shut in certain situations, because maybe what the

Get Access