Compare And Contrast Thomas Aquinas And Socrates

Saint Thomas Aquinas was a Philosopher used the logic of both Aristotle and Saint Augustine to establish his teachings. He taught that believing in God was not simply for the ignorant. He used both Greek Philosophy and Christian Doctrine in his teachings. He taught an abundant of things including that the goal of Theology is is use reason to grasp the truth about God and to experience salvation through that truth. In addition to that, he shaped the catholic understanding of mortal sin and venial sin.

He taught students the Old Testament in Cologne. He earned a master’s degree in theology, served as regent master in theology while at Paris, was a priest in the Dominican Order, and served as the papal theologian in Rome. His family didn’t want him to preach about God but he did anyway because he knew it was his calling. He is one of the great teachers of the medieval Catholic Church, honored with the titles Doctor of the Church and Angelic Doctor. Saint Thomas Aquinas’s greatest contribution to the Catholic Church is his writings. Some books proved God’s existence, and others described the life of Jesus Christ

There were many circumstances in the life of Socrates and Marin Luther King which reveals their approach towards changing the world. They took several measures to improve the lives of people but the worst thing is that there end was not good. They both died in the hands of injustice. Socrates said that people should believe on their own caliber and follow the truth rather than following the majority. MLK on the other hand elaborates the topic of just and unjust law and how it is related to the unjust law. Their approaches were not similar but their intentions were same. Now the main question is ‘Is there any way we can response to those various instances of social injustice? What are unjust law and application of unjust law and how should we

“To stand up for what you believe in is more important than to be scared of imprisonment or death.” – Socrates The Apology

In this paper, I will show why Socrates’ arguments on choosing to stay in prison is better than Crito’s argument. As an inexperienced reader in philosophy, I believe it would be difficult for a reader to choose a side. This is because both sides of their arguments can be easily refuted. Thus, the question to be answered is: Whose argument is more effective? Socrates’ arguments yield to specific scenarios that shows how his action could harm the state of Athens and his future life whereas Crito’s arguments are narrower and geared more to himself. Hence, after meticulous analysis, Socrates made the right decision by staying in prison and not letting Crito convincing him to commit an unjust action.

Aquinas makes numerous claims regarding happiness. Specifically, Aquinas uses the term “happiness” in a sense of objective fulfillment, rather than subjective well-being. He asserts that human happiness does not consist in acquiring things such as money, honor, fame, power, goods of the body, or pleasure. He also claims that complete, i.e. perfect, happiness can only be achieved by contemplating God in the afterlife. I will discuss arguments for, arguments against, and my opinion for both claims.

Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica represents one of the most famous attempts to prove God's existence. Aquinas wrote at a time in which people began to develop skepticism concerning the existence of God. In this regard, it is instructive to position Aquinas

Thomas Aquinas lived in the thirteenth century. He lived during the time of Aristotle, who was starting to lose his quality of being liked a lot in Western Europe. The works gave people a whole new way of seeing things / sensible view of what is and is not important of the world. Thomas somehow managed to stay Christian and still believed in the ideas of Aristotle. Aquinas spent much of his life living on the edge of church support.

1. According to Thrasymachus, justice is what suits the strongest. Since he is stronger he dictates what is right or wrong according to his convenience. Thrasymachus argues that each government makes the laws.

St. Thomas Aquinas was born in A.D 1225 close to Naples. Thomas Aquinas was the seventh son of lower nobility. Thomas’s parents hoped he would become a person with power and influence, so they sent him to Monte Cassino. Monte Cassino was one of the big, great and wealthy Benedictine monasteries. After the monastery, Thomas went to a University just founded in Naples and it was there that he became a fan of Aristotle’s philosophy. Thomas then went against his family’s wishes, and refused careers in military or politics, and became a friar for the Dominican order. Thomas Aquinas Christianized Aristotle’s philosophy and offered solutions or explanations on God, Humanity, and the Universe.

Aquinas, Saint Thomas was born at approximately 1225 at Aquino castle in Roccasecca, Italy. As a philosopher-theologian he was arguably the most influential thinker of the medieval period. He produced a powerful synthesis that combined Aristotelian and Neoplatonic elements within a Christian context. He maintained the Christian theological traditions, inspired by Aristotle's approach sought his own argument for God's existence.

Throughout the course of history, many were influenced by knowledgeable thinkers and teachers. Those who opened the eyes of the people and presented them with new ideas regarding life and its meaning. They had made such a massive impact, that their practices still live on to this day. Whether they be a soft-spoken philosopher or child of God, some can’t help but compare and contrast not only the ideas that each had created, but also their personal traits and morals. Two that are seen as similar individuals with striking differences are Jesus and Socrates.

In Book 1 of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus engage in a passionate, and often acrimonious, conversation regarding the relationship between a ruler and those he or she rules. The following will explain each of their understandings on the topic, and compare and contrast the ways in which the two men view governance and the ruler-ruled relationship.

Socrates and Confucius were both considered well-known philosophical thinkers that made a major impact to the lives of the people who followed their work. Socrates had a mission which was to, “expose the ignorance of those who thought of themselves as wise and try to convince his fellow citizens that everyman is responsible for his own moral attitudes,” and proved to be a major influence in the city of Athens (G.M.A Grube IV). Confucius was also more of a teacher figure and sought out as a philosopher to, “be actively involved in intellectual and social trends, and to improve the quality of life that was dependent upon them,” which he pursued by the teaching of his “six arts” (Ames & Rosemont 4). In order for one to comprehend some of the of the similarities and differences between Socrates and Confucius one could compare their moral convictions, religious beliefs, views on wisdom, and their views on virtue.

"Thomas Aquinas: Scholastic Theologian and the Creator of the Medieval Christian Synthesis" reinstated the mind of reasoning and the understanding of what education is. Aquinas indeed was a very intellectual person of his time and understood what it meant to be educated; as well as what it means to be a teacher. His beliefs and research shows that he is not only a great theologian but a man that understood the essence of education and reformed it to make it sensible to others. Thomism or the philosophy of Aquinas described how people were looked into two different ways and not just one; one being the supernatural and the other one being the natural. Another distinctive thing that he did was he own definitions of what education,