Compare And Contrast Wrinkle In Time

Comparing the book to the movie you can clearly tell what certain things are different. For example, Sydelle Pulaski worked for Mr. Westing in the movie but only talked over the intercom. This not only caused a lot of drama but more depth to the plot. Also, Crow didn’t go to jail but they did talk about most of the consequences of her going to jail. This made a little bit more serious and emotional instead of just letting it go.

I think the movie is better than the book because it’s more visual, has more action, and has props.

Following on to why the book is more superior than the movie. The persuasion of the fact that the novel was better, is that the story line was a little bit slower, and easier to follow along in the Flipped book. This is easy to realize when watching the movie. They had rushed along a few things, then backtracked. For a representation, some words were repeated two or three times

The book and movie “A Wrinkle In Time” by Madeleine L'Engle has many differences and similarities. Both movie and book use a thing called the tesseract. The Wrinkle in time is movie that needs a lot of detail because of how much creativity is in the book and the movie doesn't give a lot f detail.

The 3 major differences that were seen are the shattering of the conch, the pilot’s presence, and Ralph’s attitude towards Piggy. Due to these major differences the novel left a greater impact on its readers than the movie on its viewers. Seeing the movie and as well reading the book, personally the book was a better. The book has a very different approach of that showed these 3 major differences to their full extent. Out of the two though, I would choose the book as more pleasant and

I didn’t pick the book over the movie because I think books are boring. When you are watching the movie you don’t have to use your brain that much. When I’m watching a movie about any type of genre that has a book that goes with it, I usually ask questions to myself (in my head) about

The book is better because it gives more excitement and emotion. The book just explains each of the events in great detail. I don’t know about other people, but for me the more information there is, the more I understand it. And in the movie of “The Outsiders”, it does not really say much about what’s going on. For instance, when Johnny dies, in the movie, Ponyboy goes home but it does not tell how long he had been out. In the book, Pony is walking home from the hospital and a man asked him if he wanted a ride (Hinton 151). Though others might think that the movie is better because it visualizes the events that are happening. But, even though it envisions what the book tells about does not mean that it is one hundred percent better.

The movie was more interesting than the book because it helped me visualize the story. Most of the more exciting scenes from the movie are not in the book, this is why I like the movie more than the book.

I enjoyed the book more than the movie because it gave more time and detail into the story. The movie felt like it moved really fast, forgetting many of the important parts that were shown in the book. The book flowed nicely, giving the reader a chance to feel like they are in the story, but the movie didn’t give me a chance to understand these characters. I feel like if I watched the movie first, I would not understand the characters and their emotions as much as when I read the book first. Finally, I would have included the daughters of Mary and Mary Day more in the movie. Without it, it would be harder for the watcher to understand what the purpose of them is. All in all, I enjoyed the book much more than the movie due to its amount of detail and spacing of

The movie had the power to paint a picture your mind. But it didn't have that information that the book had. The movie didn't have the explaining that the

And Then There Were None and A Wrinkle In Time has some similarities and differences within the movies and the books. And Then There Were None has the same concept, people are invited to the Owens’ house, there are 10 guests on the island. A Wrinkle In Time has the same concept as well, Meg and Charles Wallace are out trying to find their father.

In A Wrinkle In Time, one of the biggest differences from the book is the plot sequencing in the movie. The movie first starts with Meg at school daydreaming about her father and her talking with each other on their “stargazing rock,” where in the book it starts with Meg talking about the thunderstorm. Another difference is, in the middle of the movie, Meg meets

In my opinion, the movie was a lot better than the book. There was a couple scenes in both the book and the movie I enjoyed. The movie was much easier to understand. The movie and the book had many differences. During the movie, Mia was a whole different person than she was in the book.

As Mrs. Who said, “For that he was a spirit too delicate To act their earthy and abhorr’d commands, Refusing their grand hests” The story I will be talking about is called A Wrinkle in time and it is about a girl named Meg her brother Charles and a friend named Calvin. They decide to go find megs dad who had been missing for years with the help of Mrs. Who, Whatsit and Which who were warriors who helped the universe. I believe the book is more powerful because first it has better descriptive words and that helps you visualize it unlike a movie also the book is longer and has more in it than the movie.

mom the narrator, and her sister Maggie who has been working with her mother. As Mrs.