Compare/ Contrast Han China Mauryan/ Gupta India Essay

From 600 BCE to 600 CE, China experienced changes in its political system in terms of the dissimilar ruling styles of different leaders, the rule under Legalism, and the influence of philosophical thinking like Daoism. These changes, influenced by aspects of the world and its own region, shaped China into its Classical state. In contrast, the concept of the Mandate of Heaven, the civil service system, and the significance of unity through a strong central government remained constant throughout China’s Classical period. These continuities followed through, staying essentially the same as an important part of China’s identity.

Classical Athens put the power in the hands of the people and let them decide who should govern their society. Han China believed that heaven chose who was best to rule via Mandate of Heaven (“Document 6”). Although there are little similarities, there are a wide variety of differences between the two. The three main differences lay in the government, social structures, and religious beliefs.

22.  What political and cultural differences stand out in the histories of fifteen century China and Western Europe?  What similarities are apparent?  Why?

Both the Romans and the Han Dynasty Chinese had a lot in common even though they lived thousands of miles apart, but had many differences as well. Both civilizations lasted hundreds of years and accumulated each a population of more than fifty to sixty million inhabitants. While the two developed around the same time frame they spoke different languages, had different governments, and different ways of living. Their main way of food was agriculture. Both great civilizations had perfected the ways of trade and had built numerus roads to do so. Trade was their major source of money and exotic products such as cotton and spices. Additionally, both of them concentrated on territory expansion. While both these civilizations had many similarities in their economic structure they had a few differences as well.

Imperial Rome and Han China were two of the biggest empires during the Classical period. They shared many of the same qualities, yet they had little to no contact with one another. Imperial Rome and Han China were similar because they used ideologies to control their citizens rather than religion, and they were different because Han China had an extensive educated bureaucracy as opposed to Rome’s authoritarian government based on military power.

Analyze similarities and differences in methods of political control in two of the following empires from 600 BCE to 600 CE (Han China, Mauryan/Gupta India, Imperial Rome).

When comparing Han China and Roman Empire, many political, geographical, and religious similarities can be found, though many differences are also prevalent. Though Roman and Han political structures both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through many amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfalls. Their religions differed immensely, with Rome emphasizing polytheism and Han China focusing on Confucianism. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay. One might ask, Which civilization yielded the best economy during this era?

These two great empires Imperial Rome and Han China both had highly advanced political structures. These two empires both had highly political structures because Not only that but both of these two empires held on and retained many aspects from their previous empires or systems, like the Han Empire used aspects from the Qin dynasty while Imperial Rome used aspects from the Roman Republic. Another big similarity in these two EMpires was that they achieved great architectural achievements. The two empires in many ways were also different. One of the things that they differed in was their religion but their religion wasn’t always so different. In early Imperial Rome, their main religion was called socialism. While on the other hand, the

Although Rome and Han China’s Emperor had similar roles, they were much different when it came to power and obtaining power.

Noah Saleh Mrs. Chadderdon WHAP 4th Hour 12 October 2014 WHAP Comparative Essay In the history of ancient civilizations on Earth, there has been a variety of tested methods of political control, some deeming to have excellent outcomes, and for others, the opposite. Imperial Rome and Han China, both ruling during the Classical period, utilised specific organisation of power, and to great success. Although the Roman empire and Han dynasty both shared similarities in holding an empirical position, the use of defensive walls, and military strength, they also possessed various differences.

The Han and Roman domains were distinctive in their strategies for political control in the classical period as they utilized the ruler and republic frameworks separately in light of the distinctions in societal association. In any case, these domains were comparable in that they were both ruled via dictatorial tenet sooner or later to fortify the administration's political control. At last, these realms were comparative in that the pioneers utilized religious and ideological impact to control the general population since individuals trues philosophies and religions to manage their activities.

Han China (206 BCE- 220CE) has a rounded out political and intellectual structure and the Mauryan/Gupta India (320BCE-550CE) had their period of political stability. These empires had their differences especially politically. They were different in the ways of their bureaucracy and ideology and similar in their political centralization. In bureaucracy, they were different because China had a more improved bureaucracy than India’s. In their ideology India was more towards Buddhism, while China had an emphasis on Confucianism.

The Han Dynasty was ruled from both emperors as a centralized bureaucracy that focused on administration and imperial expansion. This aided the Han Dynasty to expand and thereby prosper to be one of the greatest ruling empires of all time. India also share some of these values as during the Mauryan Dynasty, Chandragupta Maurya ruled a centralised and unified government. He ran a bureaucratic administrative system which enabled them to implement policies throughout the state, much like the Han.

India’s dynasties were so different from China’s and Persia’s dynasties. India was a lot more culturally diverse, and their ruling revolved around their culture and religious tradition. The Mauryan and Gupta dynasties both got their structure and foundations from the Persian empire and their leaders. Darius established Achaemenid rule and administration in India, and then Alexander the Great came and stayed for a short time, and then left. Though Alexander the Great did not leave an impression on them, he started a power vacuum, which Chandragupta filled, and started the Mauryan empire. He continued to use the Persian technique of administration and he laid the foundation of centralized rule, the first on to do that in India. Chandragupta did this by first taking control of the small provinces of Magadha and working his way to the center of India. In fourth century BCE, the empire stretched all the way from Indus to Ganges River in North India.

Han Dynasty and Roman Empire have many cultural aspects including religious, geographical, and political similarities that can be compared, though many differences are also widespread during this era. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay. One might ask, Which civilization yielded the best economy during this era?