Compare The Five Ways The Roman Government Met The Common Good

The Roman government was far superior in the ways it was formed and run not only in their success nut in the Athenians failure.

Romans were a civilization that originated after the Greek culture. They, like Greeks, saw an extreme significance in the idea of a love for one’s country and loyalty. The Romans, however, were more concerned with public affairs such as education, sanitation, and health. They held a strong connection with their ancestors and wished to imitate what the ancient Romans did. Although Romans rejected the idea of a Rex, or king, they favored the common hero. They wanted a leader who a “regular Joe”, someone who was average and could still led an average life after doing extraordinary things. The Romans also had a very defined government that was broken into consuls, senate, and assembly. There were two consuls who served in place of the king as the leaders of the Roman Empire. Next in succession was the senate, comprised only of patricians who debated and passed legislation. Finally, there was the assembly made for the plebeians to approve laws.

Rome had a better system due to the vast population, wider acceptance of citizens, and an organized Senate. It is important to include those specific attributes in an empire for organization and prevention of overpopulation. According to the background essay, citizens of a state or empire not only meant meeting certain responsibilities, but also enjoying certain rights. Citizenship is also defined as a status given by a government. In the modern world citizenship involves a balance between individual rights and responsibilities. In Rome however, the idea of a good citizen was particularly different. In contrast to modern day citizens, Roman citizens were looked upon how they acted with their family, neighbors, and property. Rome had a population

One reason that the system of citizenship in Rome was better was who was able to be a citizen they considered almost every human to be a citizen except slaves. One example of this is in document A when it tells us that all men, women, and children were able to be citizens. His evidence helps explain that Rome had a stronger system because when they let more people

Another document that supports the idea that Rome’s system of how Rome controlled its citizens participated in government was better than Athens is Document D. In Peter Walsh’s book, he states that the level of a citizen’s political involvement was based on their moral fitness and administrative competence. Due to this, Rome made sure that the people who were chosen to serve in the Senate had good behavior and were the people most capable to help the government work. These two documents support the idea that Rome’s system of citizenship was better than Athens’ because of how the people participated in the

The Roman Republic conquered and overcame a lot of other cities but to do that they had to Provide Public Services, Promote Rule of Law, Prepare a common defense, Support the economic system and Protect rights, So were they meeting the common good.

Arthur Erickson said that, “Ancient Rome was as confident of the immutability of its world and the continual expansion and improvement of the human lot as we are today”. In Rome got two kinds of government, and there were Roman Empire and Roman Republic. Both of them had different structures to development on many aspects in Rome such as laws, equality and rights of life’s Roman where Rome wanted a democratic system. Although, it has helped later to now, in that time was a conflict where it created a war.

First, Romans created a strong government where not just one branch had unlimited power. The Romans had strong leaders almost like the president and senators. For example, if one branch wanted to pass a law, all branches would vote to see if the law could last or not be a law at all. Even though the people of America vote, the Romans still influenced a lot of people.

The Romans were alot like us today one way is government system was similar to ours.Romans laws were harsh for many reasons. They had entertainment just like the ones we have they had lots activities.

Subsequently, the system was corrupted because weak or vulnerable individuals were associating with men in power; in exchange of support, and loyalty, for the sake of protection, which broke the Democracy. Socrates said, “Democracy elevates men to positions of authority not because of their wisdom or their fitness to govern, but because of their ability to sway the masses with empty rhetoric. In Democracy, it is not truth that matters; it is public relations.” That is exactly what it was happening in the Roman Republic.

The principle of the Roman government was to function for the people, hence classifying them as a republic (Res Publica or the Thing or Matter of the People). Before the commencement of the Republic, Rome was ruled by a line of Etruscan kings called Tarquins. The

I gave the Roman government provide public services a A-. The Romans had a well working government when it came to providing public services. They built roads, post offices, and they had fire departments. The Romans created jobs by building new things they had pavers pave the roads and builders to build the post offices and fire departments. Another thing the Romans were good at was creating new things that made a big impact on their village. The Romans created a bath house where the Roman people would wash themselves by using a sponge on a stick in the bath house they also had toilets to use. The Romans invented a heating system by boiling water so it is hot and then putting it at the bottom of the house and use the steam to keep them warm

Rome starting off as a monarchy put values on the roman society meaning that in rome you would have a king. Social class meant a lot in ancient roman society you had: Soldiers and Officers, senators, patricians and slaves and freeman. The better your class the better benefits you had in the roman society. When rome became a republic in 509 (BC) they moved into more of an Assembly.There was a senate made up of old wise men to become a senate you had to be on the first console. This showed that one of the most important values to roman society was there leadership roles and how and who had power. Rome did not want to allow too much power to be in one person hands.

The Roman people, a whole, were able to create a system of government that would last for five hundred years. The Roman Republican government was strong but was not strong enough and would eventually crumble like the empire itself and be replaced with the “Imperial Government”. However there were many things that made the Roman Republican government great, so great that the future would model their governments of Rome’s. The United States would model their government off of the Roman Republic, to form the democracy that we know today.

Can you imagine living in a society that was 2525 years old? And what would happen to you if you are not free and a citizen of that society? The Roman society had many good things such as people could elect the government officials, the check and balance in the government, and the Roman citizens were protected by the Roman laws. However, I think the Roman society was bad because of the following three reasons: non-citizen such as women and slaves could not vote, people had to pay very high taxes, and they had slaves.